In philosophy, is stillness immobility?

Is stillness the same as immobility? Does not move make it still? If the prerequisite for stillness is immobility, then stillness is a phenomenon that arises relative to immobility, and immobility is a prerequisite for it.

So what is immobility, what is the connection between immobility and stillness, if it does not move, it will be still, if it is not still, if it is not still, if it is still it will not move, if it is not still, if it is not still, if it is not moving, what is the state? Since the static is moving, the moving is static, the moving is static, the static is moving and static, the combination of movement and static, static is moving, and moving is static.

Refinement is not immobility, it is just a state of motion, absolute when moving, stillness is temporary, relative, stillness is said to be the cessation of motion, it can also be said to be an inherent property of untitled and unchanging, for example, you when you were a child and you are now, if you say from the point of view of ignorance, the matter that makes you up has changed, it is not you, but from the perspective of a member of society, you are still you, this is stillness.

As the ethics manager says, is inaction doing nothing? You see, the volcano is stationary, but inside it is violently moving.

It's up to you. Philosophy is the source of science, and you can look back at it from various disciplines.

Look at it from the perspective of metaphysics or dialectical materialism.

The relationship between absolute and relative.

Everything in the world is the unity of absolute motion and relative stillness, which is static in motion and movement in stillness. Movement is unconditional, eternal, and absolute; Stillness is conditional, temporary, and relative.

There is stillness in motion, there is movement in stillness, and everything is the unity of absolute motion and relative static. Metaphysics denies movement and absolutizes stillness; Relativist sophistry only acknowledges motion, denies relative stillness. Their common mistake was to separate the two.

Therefore, it can be said that the relationship between motion and rest belongs to the relationship between absolute and relative.

Motion and stillness are the unity of opposites:

Without absolute motion, there is no such thing as relative stillness. On the other hand, without relative rest, it is impossible to determine exactly what is moving and in what form it is moving, and therefore there can be no absolute motion. This relationship is also manifested in the opposing unity of non-discontinuity and discontinuity of movement.

Even the simplest mechanical movement is a unity of opposites of non-discontinuity and discontinuity.

The distance traveled by a moving object is uninterrupted, which is mathematically represented by the fact that there are no "adjacent" two points on a continuous curve, and that there are an infinite number of points between any two points, but each point in the distance is interrupted, i.e., one point and not another. The same is true of complex motion, which does not stop at any moment, which is its non-discontinuous;

However, the never-ending movement can only exist in specific special forms of movement, which is its discontinuity. The non-discontinuity of motion is unconditional and absolute, and the discontinuity of motion is conditional and relative. There can be no real movement with only non-discontinuity, or only discontinuity without non-discontinuity.

From a philosophical point of view, the relationship between motion and rest belongs to the relationship between absolute and relative, and the difference is: motion is unconditional, eternal, and absolute; Stillness is conditional, temporary, and relative. It can be said that there is stillness in movement, there is movement in stillness, and everything is the unity of absolute motion and relative static.

Philosophical meaning of motion and stillness: Motion refers to the changes and processes of all things and phenomena in the universe. Movement is unconditional, eternal, and absolute.

Stillness is a special state of motion. Stillness is conditional, temporary, and relative.

Rest is the relative state of motion. It is relative, not eternal.

In philosophy (materialist dialectics), it is said that "motion is absolute, and stillness is relative", which is to the effect that the "change" of things happens all the time, and the "non-change" is temporary, or just that the change is not obvious. The meaning of motion, rest, and relative in philosophy is different from that in physics.

Stillness is the measure and link of motion, and without acknowledging stillness, motion cannot be measured or understood. Second, motion and stillness are interpenetrating. There is stillness in movement, and there is movement in stillness. Third, rest is relative, and motion is absolute.

Stillness is the stillness of a certain time and a certain range, and it is a special state of motion, while motion is timeless, omnipresent, and eternal. The denial of the movement and its absoluteness is a metaphysical worldview; Denying the existence of relative stillness leads to relativism and sophistry. They all sever the dialectical relationship between motion and rest in different ways.

Stillness, when a particular entity (or entity) has not changed in any way in its spatial position.

Movement refers to the active change of spatial position by an entity in order to maintain its own stability.

Motion is continuous for any entity—so any entity in the universe is always in motion (i.e., not at rest for any period of time that is not zero) until it dies.

Obviously, an absolutely stationary entity does not exist in the universe; In the universe, there are only relatively stationary entities (that is, specific entities that have no change in their spatial position or spatial distance from each other with the existence other than the heart of the universe as a reference).

It is important to know that the spatial position of any entity in the universe with the center of the universe as a reference object changes with the progress of evolution all the time; The spatial position of the non-celestial center as a reference may not change.

In addition, it must be emphasized that for Dao Neng, movement is active, not passive.

Motion is not a passive change in the spatial position of a particular entity due to unbalanced energy; Rather, it is a protective change that it takes the initiative to make in order to better maintain its own stability when it is unbalanced.

From this, it can be seen that the autonomy of movement is controlled by specific entities, not by external energies.

Knowing that movement occurs actively, rather than passively, can resolve many questions, such as: Why is the universe expanding? Why is it that the same energy is accepted, and the phenomenon of "repulsion with electricity, attraction with different electricity" occurs?

While acknowledging the absoluteness of motion, dialectical materialism also acknowledges the existence of a certain relative state of rest in matter. Relative rest is a special state of motion, which indicates that the movement of matter is in a state of temporary stability and equilibrium under certain conditions and within a certain range. Stillness is conditional, temporary, and therefore relative.

There are two basic cases of relative rest:

One is that there is no relative position movement. That is, from a certain frame of reference, the relationship between objects and objects maintains a certain equilibrium, or no relative position movement occurs.

The second is that there has been no qualitative change. That is, from the point of view of the thing itself, the thing still retains its own nature, is still in the stage of insignificant quantitative change and does not become something else, and temporarily appears as a static state. However, even in this case, the object is moving and changing, and sooner or later it loses its original properties and becomes something else.

Philosophically speaking stillness refers to two situations: one is that the spatial position between things remains the same; The second refers to the fact that the nature of a certain aspect of a thing remains basically unchanged for a certain period of time. Stillness is not absolute non-motion, not complete stillness, but the movement of matter is in a state of temporary stability and equilibrium under certain conditions and within a certain range.

Stillness is an inconspicuous motion, a special state of motion. Thus, stillness is relative.

Materiality:

The Principle of the Dialectical Relationship between Matter and Motion:

Everything in the world is in motion and change, motion is the fundamental attribute and mode of existence of matter, matter is the material in motion, and the matter without motion does not exist; Motion is the movement of matter, and matter is the bearer (subject) of motion, and motion without matter does not exist.

The principle of the dialectical relationship between motion and stillness:

Distinctions: Motion is absolute, unconditional, and eternal, while stillness is relative, conditional, and temporary: stillness is a special state of absolute motion, and the material world is the unity of absolute motion and relative stillness.

Acknowledging only stillness without denying motion is metaphysical invariance, and recognizing only absolute motion without denying relative stillness leads to relativism and sophistry. The principle of the dialectical relationship between matter and time and space in motion:

Stillness in Marxist philosophy means that the nature of things has not changed radically; Things are not moving relative to their position; The movement of things is in a state of temporary stability and equilibrium.