How to understand Paul s war

What does Kant's contradiction of the two laws mean? Teacher Wang Dongyue will take you to analyze Kant's inner world.

The antithesis of the two laws, from the Greek antinomies

1: refers to the contradiction in the law, the mutual exclusion phenomenon that exists between the two interrelated laws of force movement. The two forces of movement that exist in nature have opposite effects on each other, one on the other, and on the other.

2.It is the basic concept of philosophy put forward by the German classical philosopher Immanuel Kant in the 18th century. It refers to the contradiction and conflict between two propositions that are established by each side on the basis of universally recognized principles and are recognized as correct.

Kant believed that because the dialectical nature of human rational cognition tries to transcend the limits of its own experience to understand the object itself, mistakenly regards the idea of the universe as the object of cognition, and uses things that explain phenomena to explain it, this will inevitably produce the contradiction of the two laws.

There is a wide range of contradictory relationships between logistics services and logistics costs. For example, distribution is the link where an enterprise sends goods to customers, and it belongs to the end of transportation in the logistics system. Distribution is the most direct contact between enterprises and customers, in the modern society that emphasizes the supremacy of customers, the service quality and speed of distribution activities will directly affect the sales performance of enterprises, and then affect the survival and development of enterprises.

In distribution activities, enterprises often fall into a dilemma: on the one hand, the increasingly fierce market competition requires enterprises to continuously improve the quality of their distribution services; But on the other hand, the improvement of the quality of distribution services will inevitably lead to an increase in distribution costs. The quality and cost of distribution services have formed a contradiction, and the improvement of service quality can enhance the image and reputation of the enterprise and increase the profits of the enterprise.

However, the increase in distribution costs will reduce the profits of enterprises. This is the phenomenon of "benefit reversal" in distribution.

The similarities between the two are: 1. The purpose of the program is the same. If bankruptcy reconciliation is the first rejection of the traditional bankruptcy law, then bankruptcy reorganization is a departure from and reshaping of the traditional bankruptcy law at a higher level.

The purpose is to introduce a procedural mechanism for bankruptcy prevention in addition to the bankruptcy liquidation procedure, so as to improve the bankruptcy law in a larger system. Therefore, from the perspective of the nature of the legal department, the bankruptcy reconciliation law and the bankruptcy reorganization law are both part of the bankruptcy prevention law. 2. The nature of the procedure is the same.

As legal procedures for the prevention of bankruptcy, both extend and extend in the premise and state of non-litigation, so they both fall within the scope of non-litigation events, and both adopt the principle of procedural initiation based on the principle of party application, and the provisions of the Civil Procedure Law can be applied when the legal norms are insufficient. 3. The principle of autonomy of will is the basis for the procedural advancement, although in reconciliation and reorganization, the initiative and proportion of the court to exercise judicial discretion are different, whether the settlement can be reached and whether the reorganization can be carried out are all based on the autonomy of will and the common agreement of the parties and other interested parties. This is partly due to their non-contentious nature, and partly due to the fact that what they regulate is, after all, a private relationship.

The phenomenon of "two laws and opposites" in the logistics system.

There is a relationship between the various activities of logistics (transportation, storage, handling, packaging, distribution processing)."Benefit reversal"(trad off), so-called"Benefit reversal"Yes"Two aspects of the same resource (e.g., cost) are in a contradictory relationship, and if one of the objectives is to be achieved more, the other will inevitably suffer a partial loss"。

For example: (1) Reducing the number of inventory bases and minimizing inventory will inevitably make inventory replenishment more frequent and will inevitably increase the number of transportation.

If the packaging is simplified, the packaging strength will be reduced, and the goods in the warehouse cannot be stacked too high, which will reduce the storage efficiency. Moreover, it is easy to be damaged in the process of loading, unloading and transportation, so that the handling efficiency decreases and the damage rate increases.

2) Changing rail transportation to air transportation, although the freight rate has increased, the transportation speed has increased significantly. In addition to reducing the inventory of logistics bases in various regions, it has also significantly reduced storage costs.

3) Due to the existence of various logistics activities"Benefit reversal"Therefore, it is necessary to study the overall benefits and systematize logistics.

There is a law of contradiction between logistics services and costs. Between logistics functions, the cost reduction of one function will increase the cost of the other. Because the various costs are interrelated, the overall optimal cost must be considered.

Example of the contradiction of the two laws.

1. People have freedom of will - people do not have freedom of will.

2. The universe is bounded and finite - the universe is boundless.

Antinomies is a basic concept of philosophy proposed by the 18th-century German classical philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). It refers to the contradiction between two propositions that are recognized by each of the two sides on the basis of universally recognized principles. Since the dialectical nature of human rational cognition tries to transcend the boundaries of one's own experience to understand objects, mistakenly regards the idea of the universe as the object of cognition, and uses things that explain phenomena to explain it, this will inevitably produce the contradiction of the two laws, while practice can make the subjective see the objective and demonstrate the truth of the unity of relativity and absoluteness.

Examples of the contradiction of the two laws: 1. People have freedom of will - people do not have freedom of will. 2. The universe is bounded and finite - the universe is boundless.

You need a decompression software, so you go to the next decompression software, and after you go down, you find that you have placed a compression package, which is the reversal of the two laws.

Take a chestnut:

Capital, vol. 1.

Like Bridan's donkey, because it was in the middle of two piles of hay of equal quality, it could not make any rational decision about which pile of hay to eat, so it starved to death.

Here I think that both of these choices are reasonable, mutually exclusive and opposite, but this completely rational donkey is beyond people's imagination, so there will be a conclusion that either of the two grasses is right but contradictory.

The contradiction of the two laws is two diametrically opposed or even contradictory conclusions, but both conclusions are correct, that is, ignoring the changes in the objective situation and the relativity of truth, the so-called 'absolute truth'

Here's an easy-to-understand example.

There are only two genders in human beings.

Hideyoshi is the third gender of the human race.

Antinomies refer to the contradiction between two propositions that are recognized by the two parties based on universally recognized principles.

The contradiction of the two laws is a basic concept of philosophy proposed by the classical German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) in the 18th century. Taken literally, it is two laws that deviate from each other and lead to opposite conclusions.

When reason attempts to define the infinite totality of "soul", "world", and "God" in terms of intellectual categories, and grasps them as objective objects, there can be two opposite stipulations of the same object, and they can both be proved to the same degree. This is the famous dualistic antithesis, and Kant proposed four sets of dualistic opposites of reason in the Critique of Pure Reason on the problem of cosmology.

The above are too theoretical, let me give you a simple example: you need a decompression software, so you go to the next decompression software, after you go down, you find that you have placed a compression package, this is the contradiction of the two laws.

The two laws are reversed bai, and it is simple to du

It is said that "one eliminates the other" and "it is difficult to have the best of both worlds".

For example, the main indicator for evaluating a right product is "cheap and good", but there is a dichotomy between "cheap" and "good". If you want to be cheap, it is difficult to ensure quality; To ensure high quality, it is difficult to control**. The two trade-offs each other and restrains each other, and it is difficult to achieve the best of both worlds.