Should the elderly in rural areas be shared by their children? What s your opinion?

The pension of the elderly in rural areas should be shared by their children, and I think that some elderly people can share the pressure with their children when they raise their children after raising their children. It can reduce each other's pension burden, and if the elderly choose to live in their daughter's house, the person who is the son should give some living expenses to his sister's family. The purpose is to allow the mother to live in her daughter's house for a period of time, and if the elderly feel bored staying at their daughter's house, they can also go to live at their son's house.

Many young people don't realize the good of having a daughter when they are young, and they really realize that they have a daughter when they are old, and they can go to their daughter's house at any time as a guest. Changing the environment in which they live back and forth will make the elderly experience a different sense of freshness. Children do not have time to be with their parents, and parents can go to the cities where their children live to help young people take care of their children.

Living with your grandchildren will add a sense of happiness to the lives of the elderly. <>

As the saying goes, there is no filial son in front of the bed for a long time, and some rural elderly people are taken care of by their daughters when they are sick. The son of the old man can only be responsible for paying the medical bills or the parents, and if there is pension money in hand, let the parents use their own money for medical treatment. In rural areas, some people think that raising children is not to prevent old age, and most sons will still gnaw at the elderly, which is not possible to change in rural areas.

Because rural areas are particularly patriarchal, the old man favors his son excessively, making the son even more hungry and wanting to absorb the money from the old man. <>

As an old man, you should realize that it is better to have a good daughter-in-law than to have a good son, after all, many sons simply cannot take care of some things in their parents. Most of them are handed over to the daughter-in-law, if you can get along with the daughter-in-law in old age, then the daughter-in-law will also treat her parents-in-law as her own biological parents, and the contribution to each other is mutual.

Most of them are shared by the children, which is very normal, of course, there are some places where the discrimination between men and women is still more serious, the family property will be inherited by the son, and most of the pension expenses will be borne by the son at this time.

If you do not contact the other party to divide it equally, it may lead to very serious disputes between the children, and it is not conducive to the emotional development between the two parties.

Yes, the pension should be shared by the children, and the inheritance should be divided equally.

Of course, it can be shared, and the assets should also be shared fairly and equitably, and now men and women are equal.

Generally speaking, in rural areas, sons are old-fashioned, and daughters will not often go home when they get married, and the elderly's inheritance will also be divided equally by their sons.

At the time of the implementation of the rural insurance policy, rural residents with household registration had reached the age of 60 and did not enjoy the basic old-age insurance for urban workers.

Treatment. These elderly people do not have to pay, and they can receive a basic pension of 60 yuan per month.

But the premise is that their eligible children need to participate in social insurance.

and pay in full and on time.

Regardless of whether the children are farming or working in the city, as long as the ginseng is infiltrated with the new rural insurance.

Or the basic endowment insurance for enterprise employees, their parents who have reached the age of 60 can receive 60 yuan per month without paying a penny. The relevant person in charge said that the participation of children in insurance and the benefit of parents is a form of social security to reflect the responsibility of family support, which is conducive to expanding coverage and promoting family harmony, and will not affect the pension insurance treatment of children in their old age.

Extended reading: [Insurance] How to buy, which one is better, teach you to avoid these insurance"pits"