If the only child is not filial, what should the adoptive parents do?

If the only son is not filial to himself, then discipline him strictly, enlighten him psychologically, let him realize that what he has done all his life is for him, if you are not filial, we will not force it, let you go, let you go to seek your own sky.

A lot of data show that only children have the advantages of being smart, empathetic, and having a strong sense of responsibility, but they are squeamish and willful, selfish and indifferent, rebellious, have poor frustration, are highly dependent, unsociable, ununited, have poor discipline, and are not grateful. As today's one-child parents, whether they are only children or not, they need to grasp some basic principles in the process of raising their own children: 1) Communicate and interact with children from an early age, and the relationship should maintain a win-win situation rather than a lose-lose situation.

There is no such thing as a "listen to the child or the parent" paradox. 2) The choices and decisions we make must be negotiated on the basis of full consideration of the requirements of both parties. When parents respect their children, not just order you and ask you to be obedient, children will not only build good self-esteem, but also take the initiative to respect their parents.

3) When parents give timely feedback and guidance when their children are willful, it is not to suppress children, but to let children learn to adjust their own behavior according to the external environment, others and their own actual situation. 4) Objectively understand and accept the child's abilities and strengths, and do not pin all good things on the child, for example, I hope that the child will be obedient, have feelings for himself, and be able to stay by his side, and hope that the child will be creative, have achievements, and fly away.

Although it is said that raising children to prevent old age, it is not necessarily possible to guarantee that every son can be relied on.

If the only child is not filial, the parents will first sue him. Let him fulfill his obligation to support. If his parents are rich, then they will cut off his property and cancel his inheritance.

When the parents are old and have difficulties in life, the children's non-responsibility for support can be resolved through legal means. If you just want your children to listen to you, it doesn't make sense, you are all adults, learn to respect others.

If your children are not filial, as adoptive parents, you have a certain responsibility. But the day after tomorrow figure it out. If you want to convert your child to him, then you have to go through some methods and means. We must start with his ideological education.

Well, if you feel that your only child doesn't smile, then you, as parents, can try to support yourself, and when you reach a certain age, you can try to go to a nursing home. Or you can try to find some light jobs on your own, such as security guards, it's still easier to support yourself.

If the only child is not filial, the parents can only rely on themselves, so now the pension insurance is also more important, in case the child does not prevent old age, there is also a guarantee.

Normally, you can mediate at the Jinxing Police Station or if the neighborhood committee is serious, you can go to the local court to mediate in the local court.

Of course, this child will be sued. Now the child knows how awesome the law is. Let him know that children are obligated to support their parents. If the parent has property, then he is deprived of inheritance rights.

If you encounter a child who does not support her parents, you can protect yourself through legal means and go to court to sue the child for forcibly supporting her parents.

If there is only this one child, but he is not very filial to his parents, I think we should not be particularly sad, because each child's emotions and personalities are also different, maybe now he is still more rebellious, I don't know the good intentions of his parents, we must have a good attitude, live their own life, sooner or later the child will know how to be filial to his parents.

First, the court sued him, and if he did not respect the elderly and did not support the elderly, let the law punish him. Enforce him.

It can be prosecuted by law, and failure to support the elderly can be enforced in accordance with the law. Target.

If the only child is not filial and does not support his parents, then the parents can strictly require him to go through legal means. Take care of you. There are generally few only children who are so disrespectful to their parents.

You can hire a nanny, or you can tell her in advance that she is not filial to the elderly, and that she will not get any of the family's property, and notarize the property in advance, to see if she is afraid, she will run fast.

There's really no way, there's really no way, who lets you give birth to only one? If you had a few more, you wouldn't have so much to talk about.

Children may be sued in the court of the place where the elderly are domiciled and asked to assume the obligation of support.

Normally, mediation can be carried out through the local neighborhood committee or police station, and if the mediation fails, mediation can be carried out through court litigation.

You can go to the prosecution, and it is also a crime to not be filial to your parents.

It will be morally condemned by everyone.

The only child settling in a foreign country cannot be said to be unfilial.

If the child does not support the elderly, he or she can sue the court to defend his rights.

Whether the only child is also directly related to the education of his parents, if he is not filial and settles in another province, his parents can go to the court to sue him, and if he does not support his parents and ask for alimony, the court will give a judgment.

If it is said that it is not filial just because the only child settles in another province and feels unfilial, it is inevitable that the parents are selfish, the child's adult life and future life are their own, it doesn't matter where they live, it is good to fulfill the obligation of support and care, after all, your child may have to support four old people.

How can a child choose to settle in another province and be unfilial? From a child's point of view, it only shows that you are selfish! The child chooses to live in a foreign country, which means that this is the life he wants, don't you want the child to be happy?

In fact, you can do what you can on your own. It's okay to make a little money to support your family. For example, when you are old, you can do some easy work, although the salary is not high, but it should be no problem to support yourself, so I think that in the case of being able to work, it is better not to rely on children, after all, nieces also have their own difficulties and their own families, what do you think?

The child settles in other provinces can not be said that the child is not filial, the child has his own ambition and development space, maybe the province is more attractive, more development space and suitable for their own work, the elderly should be considerate and understand the children. Nowadays, there are many, many only children working in other places.

If the child has a better development in other provinces, it shouldn't be unfilial piety to settle down, right? Parents also want their children to be successful, don't they? It will be better to learn the way parents and children get along abroad, and everyone will not be tired.

Is it unfilial piety to settle outside? If you're not at ease, you can go over.

When the child is older, he has to fly away, so be mentally prepared in advance!

Require a good obligation to support parents.

Then you'd better go up to your children's side.

There are indeed unfair things in this society, but the situation you are talking about does not seem to have much to do with others.

First of all, there are a lot of people who support four old people with two children, and most of the people in our era are only children, and the only child and the only child get married, isn't there the kind of result you said, this is not an exception, it is a common phenomenon. Nothing unfair.

And what you are talking about below is a problem, none of the four of you have bought social security, who can blame this? I can only blame yourself, when will you call for buying social security, you don't buy it yourself, and you know that you can't live when you're old? It's unfair again, isn't it unfair for you to say that?

At that time, no one forbade you to buy social security, but mobilized everyone to participate in the purchase of social security, and you didn't participate in it yourself, and now others have benefits and returns, so you say it's unfair? At that time, you were reluctant to invest, how can you get a return now? If you want to complain or blame yourself for your rigid thinking, don't complain about others.

He has the right to inherit property, unless his mother has a will that states that he does not have the right to inherit property. Because he is filial or not, it is not judged by outsiders, but needs his mother to show it to outsiders in the form of a will.

According to the laws of the country, there are two situations in which the right to inheritance is revoked:

First, the decedent appoints the heir of the property by way of a will or bequest, and the inheritance rights of the heirs other than the will are naturally cancelled, which is determined by the subjective intention of the decedent, and it is also the right given to the decedent by law;

Second, if there are obligations attached to a testamentary succession or bequest, the heir or legatee shall perform the obligations, and if he fails to perform the obligations without a legitimate reason, the people's court may revoke his right to accept the inheritance at the request of the relevant unit or individual. This is due to the subjective actions of the heirs or legatees.

From the foregoing, it can be seen that if his mother does not have a will to annul the inheritance of the only child, or if she asks the court to cancel the inheritance of the only child, she still has the right to inherit her mother's property.

If an only son is not filial to his parents, he has no way to inherit his parents' property, because his mother can explain that he will not let him inherit it, because he is not filial to his parents.

His mother can write a will, and it doesn't matter who inherits the property, and it doesn't matter if the will inherits it is someone else. His mother could also inherit him without writing a will. It was up to his mother to do so.

According to the national regulations, a sovereign or ionic female, unless the mother and child tuition. Inheritance transfer or a handful. to others. Winning, but just.

If there is a will arrangement, there is no inheritance that is inherited by legal heirs such as him and his father, and he can divide the estate less.

As long as the mother herself sincerely admits that her children are not filial, she does not let her children inherit, and whoever raises her and let her inherit is the mother's right.

If you don't want to leave your inheritance to your son, you can write a will and leave it to the person you want.

The will needs to be notarized to be valid!

According to the survey, the number of only children in 2000 has reached 55.78 million, in 2007 the National Population and Family Planning Commission announced that China has a total of 90 million only children, in 2010 the total number of only children in the country is about 100 million, in 2015 will reach 100 million.

Although it is an only child and is a lucky one who is loved by thousands of people, there are certain risks.

Let's talk about pension risks. The pension risk of one-child families includes the pension of one-child parents. In the case of parents of only children, there is only one child, and in the event of an injury, the funds and care that a child can provide are relatively limited.

In addition, if your target family is a one-child family, relying on the strength of two people to take care of four elderly people will inevitably lead to lack of skills. In addition, if your family or your partner's family has grandparents, you may have to take care of 8 elderly people while taking care of 4 elderly people, so I don't recommend that the party who is already an only child go to find someone who was also born as an only child. Both parties are only children, so naturally when their parents are old, they will inevitably take care of themselves.

Of course, it is not excluded that both parties are only children. At this time, as both parties who are only children, how to take care of the elderly! First of all, I still advocate sending the elderly to a nursing home.

Most people don't have this idea, thinking that since parents have their own support, they should be responsible for it to the end. Of course, I want to say that this is not unreasonable, like a one-child family that will inevitably not be able to take care of 4 elderly people at once. It is better to send the elderly to a professional nursing home, where there are professional medical staff and a good environment, where you can meet more people.

Take your grandchildren or granddaughters to see the elderly on weekends. Lighten the burden on your own family.

Our generation is the first few years of the country's implementation of family planning, we are generally only children after 90, especially in Jiangsu and Zhejiang The implementation of family planning is very strict, my mother often nagged in my ear that if I am a girl, I can have two children, so that he will have more children to take care of when he is old, then I actually have a silent saying in my heart, I also hope that I am a girl, so that I have one more, so that my childhood will not be so lonely and pitiful, And then I can lighten a little burden in the future, because supporting my parents in the future will definitely take a lot of energy, so it would be nice if there was a brother or sister to help share it.

It's a pity who makes us an only child, and most of our other half will be an only child in the future, so the two of us need to support four old people plus two children, so the burden is very heavy, I personally think that the society may improve in the future, the welfare of the elderly will become better and better, and at the same time it will reduce our burden as the pillar of society, such as ** The old-age insurance premium for the elderly will increase, and then the medical subsidy will increase, I think it is very important for the elderly to see a doctor, because the average person will have various diseases when they are old, if the medical expenses are not a problem, then it will also reduce a lot of burden, plus the elderly insurance for the elderly is enough for the elderly to use themselves, then their lives should be protected, and our burden will be reduced a lot.

Therefore, I think that the society and the country will give us the help of the new generation, we don't have to worry about the sky, everything will be natural and straight from the boat to the bridge, above.