The father died and the daughter didn t pay a penny, and now she asks her uncle for the land, should

It depends on the situation, if there is no clear information about the father's death that the land should be left to the uncle, and the daughter is the father's first heir, then it should be returned, but if the daughter did not pay a penny when the father died, and the father still has the face to ask for the land after his death, it is too inhumane, and it mainly depends on what the father said before his death.

I don't think it should be given, because the other party has not fulfilled a certain responsibility after all, and has not paid a penny.

It should not be given. Because her daughter's approach is too chilling, and she has not fulfilled her filial piety, she should not give it.

Summary. Inherited by daughters.

The father has no son, but has a daughter, and the expenses for his death are all paid by the daughter, and who should inherit the father's mountains, forests and fields.

Inherited by daughters.

If the forest with a forest right certificate in the rural area is contracted in accordance with the law, the law protects the rights of the contractor, and the contracted forest can be inherited by Zhaojingsen. Legal basis: Article 1122 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China An estate is a personal lawful property left behind by a natural person when he or she dies.

Inheritance that is not allowed to be inherited in accordance with the provisions of the law or according to the nature of its family acres shall not be inherited.

This is clearly the extent to which she has to cut off the relationship with her daughter, otherwise her daughter will not refuse to take care of the elderly without special circumstances.

Of course, this is just Lian Hui saying that he can take care of hospitalization and the like, not including receiving his daughter's family for the elderly, because the house was bought by the man's family and has nothing to do with the woman's parents.

The daughter was not the head of the family in the first place, so she could not take it over like this, and she had to get her husband's consent.

But the husband is not obliged to provide for his parents-in-law, so it is impossible to talk about this kind of thing.

Unless she wants to divorce her husband.

The daughter can only contribute within the scope of her own obligations.

Visually, all the daughters around him went to the hospital to take care of the elderly, and the son was responsible for paying for them.

And some daughters with good financial ability will also give living expenses to the elderly, which is the case.

As for following his son to support the elderly, who let the old man give all his belongings to his son?

The son's house and car were bought by the old man?

Is the pension also kept by the son?

Has the old house been handed over to his son?

The cycle of cause and effect, naturally, has its reason.

So according to this description, you can go to court and force your daughter to give some pension money, but it won't be much.

After all, the judge is not stupid, it is impossible for the daughter not to take the old man's property, and she has to bear a heavy pension responsibility.

ps: Now the only daughter, which one doesn't need to provide for her parents anymore, who said that daughters don't support their parents? I was the first to refuse.

Those who clamored that their daughters did not support the elderly, and when they swallowed the family property alone, I am afraid they didn't think about sharing it with their sisters.

When my sister's family was in difficulty, I didn't think about helping out, did I?

On the contrary, I have to take responsibility, and I think of my sisters.

I have seen a case before where the son took all the property and the bride price of the daughter.

The daughter's dowry was a few quilts and worthless pots and pans......

After marriage, the daughter will also take her husband to visit Biqiao's parents at her parents' house, buy some cigarettes and alcohol, and occasionally give a few hundred.

However, the son's family was very dissatisfied and felt that everyone should be the same.

He also instigated the old mother to sue the court, and asked her daughter to give 5,000 yuan a month.

Then that daughter's monthly income was less than 3000

In the end, the court only allowed the daughter to pay a few hundred yuan a month.

To put it mildly, if the daughter still bears the responsibility of providing for the elderly in this case, then the son-in-law should go to the court to fight a divorce lawsuit. This kind of woman who rarely lives with her.

Summary. Hello, it mainly depends on whether the father left a will, if there is a share of the aunt stated in the will, then it can be divided. If not, then the aunt has no right to demand the distribution of the father's property.

You are good, it mainly depends on whether your father left a will, if there is a share of the aunt in the will, then it is a preparation for Zheng Yifen. If not, then the aunt has no right to demand the distribution of the father's property.

The order of inheritance is according to Article 10 of the Inheritance Law, and the inheritance is inherited in the following order: first order: spouse, children, parents.

Second order: siblings, grandparents, maternal grandparents. After the inheritance begins, it is inherited by the first-order heirs, and the second-order heirs do not.

If there is no first-order heir, the second-order heir shall inherit. The term "children" in this Act includes legitimate children, children born out of wedlock, adopted children and dependent stepchildren. The term "parents" in this Act includes biological parents, adoptive parents and dependent stepparents.

The term "brothers and sisters" in this Law includes siblings of the same parents, half-siblings or half-siblings, adoptive siblings, and step-siblings who have a dependent relationship.

So my aunt is not looking for you in the order of first heir.

Summary. If his daughter is to be pursued, he can legally get it back. The money for the sale of the land belongs to the daughter, and if the daughter gives the money to the father, the father can dispose of it. If the daughter is only kept by the father, he has no right to dispose of it.

Hello, I am a cooperating lawyer, I have received your question, I need a little time to answer, wait a minute.

If his daughter is to be pursued, he can legally get it back. The money for the daughter's sale of land belongs to the daughter, and if the daughter gives the money to the father, the father can dispose of it. If the daughter is just Tuan Tong imitation for her father to keep it, he has no right to dispose of it.

If the daughter gives it to the father and does not lend it to the father, then the father gives it to the son, and the law cannot get it back.

You can come back. Because the right to the land belongs to the daughter, the money from the sale should belong to the daughter.