Should a penny lawsuit be fought, and can a penny of interest be litigated?

No, judicial resources are wasted. However, since civil litigation must specify the amount of compensation, this can be done when public interest litigation is being conducted.

I don't think so, because it's not worth it, it costs a certain amount of money to fight a lawsuit, it's not worth a penny, and there is no guarantee that you will win.

No need to hit. It is better to mediate. A lawsuit for a penny is not worth fighting. In any way.

Look at what is not a penny thing.

to be analyzed. For fairness and justice, every penny is also to be beaten. It's not about money.

But as for the cost of the lawsuit, it is not worth it, because the cost is much higher than the amount involved in this lawsuit.

It's not worth it from an economic point of view, but it's worth it from a point of view when it comes to proving that "you are on the side of justice".

Hello, you should keep the relevant evidence (such as a copy of the other party's ID card or ID number, the contract to the former, emails, mobile phone short regret letters, recordings, remittance records, etc.), and sue in time to pay back the money. It depends on whether there is a repayment time on the IOU, if there is, you should sue within 2 years after the repayment time, if you do not prosecute, the 2-year statute of limitations has expired, and at the same time, it depends on whether you have evidence to prove that the statute of limitations has been suspended or interrupted. The interest cannot exceed four times the interest of the same type of loan of the bank in the same period, and the part of the interest higher than four times is invalid.

If it is found that the other party has property before filing a lawsuit, it can apply for preservation.

As for the question of "whether a one-yuan lawsuit should be fought", it can only be said that the benevolent will see the benevolent, and the wise will see the wise.

Those who support the one-yuan lawsuit believe that the "one-yuan lawsuit" reflects the parties' awareness of their rights and their trust in the country's legal system. Opponents believe that the "one-yuan lawsuit" is a big fuss, a waste of social and judicial resources, and ultimately cannot achieve the goal of making the other party accept the lesson.

In my opinion, whether or not to file a "one-yuan lawsuit" should be decided by the parties themselves according to the circumstances, which belongs to the parties' legitimate exercise of their rights, and outsiders have no right to interfere with them.

If purely from an economic point of view, if the parties resort to the court for a mere one yuan, they must not only pay the court case acceptance fee of 50 yuan in advance (if the summary procedure is halved to charge 25 yuan), but also submit litigation materials to the court according to the regulations, and it will inevitably take a lot of time and energy to participate in the litigation, even if the court finally judges the other party to compensate the party for one yuan, it is certainly far from enough to make up for the time, energy and financial resources spent by the parties due to the litigation, which can be said to be more than worth the loss.

However, from the perspective of the exercise of the rights of the parties, if the court decides in favor of the "one-yuan lawsuit", although it is only a judgment of one yuan, it is also a confirmation of the rights that the parties should enjoy, and the value of the rights can sometimes not be measured simply in money. In particular, for the "one-yuan lawsuit" that is a public interest lawsuit, whether or not the lawsuit is won, it may have a far-reaching impact on social progress and even on the construction of the legal system.

It's time to fight! Don't steam steamed buns to fight for breath!

On the surface, it is a dollar, but in fact it represents the dignity of who is right and who is wrong. In addition, there is no need to pay legal fees if the case is won.

One Yuan Lawsuit, I remember that there are examples, and once again I casually saw a book called "Li Wen Reasoning", and there was a mention of the author of the book mentioning his own personal experience, and the title of the book is "My One Yuan Lawsuit" can be used for reference!

I don't think it's necessary to fight a one-yuan lawsuit, because it's worthless, and it will be a big loss, so it shouldn't be fought.

There is no need to go to court, not to mention the waste of time, and you have to hire a lawyer, and the time, energy, and money consumed in the process of prosecuting are not compatible, so there is no need to go to court.

Theoretically speaking, a one-yuan lawsuit should be fought, but in practice there is not so much time and today to fight this kind of lawsuit.

Should a one-dollar rolling stone be beaten? I believe that it is not a matter of how much money should be litigated, but mainly for personal gain.

As long as we are in charge, we should fight, for the sake of a breath.

It should be beaten, for the sake of dignity, face, or right or wrong.

If you want to fight, you should fight this lawsuit.

You shouldn't be fighting, you're going to lose·· Pay for one's whistle.

A very real problem ...

Let's look at the individual's thoughts...