Is it appropriate for the delivery man who helps customers buy sanitary napkins to speak out?

In fact, I have to say that it is the delivery man who helps customers buy sanitary napkins, which is actually understandable, but in some senses, the delivery man does take care of the customer's privacy and does not completely affect the customer, so it is also permissible in some senses, but for us,On the other hand, although the delivery staff is indirect, it may also cause the psychological shadow of customer privacy leakage in essence, so it is precisely because it is inappropriate to do so, so in some sense, it is necessary to effectively protect the user's privacy and avoid some unnecessary behaviors that cause psychological harm to customers, so the problem can be considered from the following aspects. <>

1. The delivery person helped the customer buy sanitary napkins and chose to do so, which obviously did not constitute a disclosure of the customer's privacy, and the delivery person also fully respected the privacy and security of the user. In fact, I have to say that it is understandable that the delivery person who buys sanitary napkins for customers does this, and it may be because it is a way to record the fun in his life, so it is undeniable that this way does not leak privacy, so it is understandable in principle. <>

2. It is undeniable that this behavior is obviously inappropriate, and it is also easy to cause unnecessary psychological pressure and psychological burden to the parties, so for us, the voice of the delivery person is obviously unreasonable. In fact, I have to say that although the delivery man said that there was no leakage of the customer's privacy, but choosing to state the incident in a short form** will indeed cause unnecessary psychological shadows and psychological burdens to the parties, so from the perspective of human nature, it is obviously inappropriate for this to happen. <>

3. Everything should be treated from two perspectives, on the one hand, the matter itself is relatively normal, so there is no need to blame the delivery person, on the other hand, although the delivery person's practice is said to take care of the customer's privacy, but the behavior is too direct. In fact, it has to be said that as far as the incident itself is concerned, it is a trivial matter in life, and it is precisely because of this that it is understandable that the delivery man chose to state the incident itself, and it fully takes care of the privacy and does not cause the customer's privacy to be leaked, but another aspect. Doing so will obviously cause unnecessary psychological shadows and psychological baggage to the parties, so it is precisely because of this that if the overall incident is not directly restored after processing, it will indeed cause unnecessary psychological baggage to the parties.

In fact, I have to say that it is reasonable for us to speak up for the delivery person who helps customers buy sanitary napkins, and there is no need to blame the delivery person for what is normal for us. On the other hand, outsiders say that they have taken full care of the privacy of customers, so there is no leakage of customer privacy, but considering that the matter itself may also cause psychological baggage to the parties, it is precisely because of this that it is obviously inappropriate to do so.

A: It's not appropriate, because I think there is a difference between men and women, and there are some inappropriateness for delivery people to do this.

It is appropriate for him to do this, because to meet the needs of customers, although he is only a delivery person, it is more important for the market and customers to meet their current needs. And they're all legitimate, and there's nothing wrong with that.

Personally, I don't think there's anything wrong with him doing this, I think it's just a job and a career, and it should be taken lightly.