Why does our country s development of aircraft carriers cause strong reactions from so many neighbor

There are two aspects to this. First, at present, China is the only country that has the ability to challenge the United States' world hegemony in the future, so from that perspective, the United States will also use geopolitics to suppress China from China's surrounding environment.

Second, whether it is Northeast Asia, where China is located, or Southeast Asia. China and its neighbors have disputes over their maritime economic interests, and these countries do not pose a threat to China, but because the United States is behind the scenes, these countries have the mentality of taking the opportunity to make a profit.

That's why the reaction is violent.

Well, the role of the aircraft carrier at sea is very large, he simply said that it is a small mobile airfield, which has the effect of increasing the range of attack of aircraft, and in conventional warfare, this is equivalent to putting the sharpest dagger in front of the enemy. An aircraft carrier can generally carry forty or fifty aircraft. If it's all anti-ship**, you should understand its threat to the opposing fleet.

In addition, if China has aircraft carriers, country A is equivalent to losing the advantage of long-range attack. Moreover, the military threat posed by aircraft carriers is enough to deter small countries such as the Philippines and Vietnam. Any other additions.

In the face of China's growing economic competitiveness in the Asia-Pacific region, what is the last resort of the United States, that is, military force? Therefore, from last year to the present, the United States has relied on its military strength in the Asia-Pacific region to constantly enrich and strengthen its balance of military power in the Asia-Pacific region, so as to maintain the balance of power against China.

And now when it comes to a country in Asia, because they see the growth of China's power, they also feel anxious, worried, and afraid, so it has to rely on the United States as a force, so the United States and Thailand, and the Philippines, including Singapore, and some countries, including Japan and Australia, want to re-strengthen military cooperation to balance China's growing influence in the region.

Normal, don't you think we are also very concerned about every aircraft carrier in the United States?

For China, of course, it is good.

But it's bad news for them.

Afraid to go back two centuries and China became their suzerain

The aircraft carrier is a kind of first-class platform, and the fighter it carries has the role of air and sea supremacy.

China's coastal defense covers an area of 3 million square kilometers, and for many years it has used conventional warships such as frigates and destroyers to patrol and protect its territorial waters. However, in such a large sea area, it is difficult to respond to sudden territorial disputes in a timely and efficient manner.

In the case of the J-15, its combat radius is 1,500 kilometers, and it can control a sea area with a diameter of 3,000 kilometers with an aircraft carrier as a platform for take-off and landing.

The aircraft carrier itself does not need to enter the combat area, and the fighters on board can complete the tasks of air and sea. Surface ships need to have direct access to the combat area.

In addition, China has more and more international interests and citizen interests overseas that need to be protected. The appearance of aircraft carriers is not only a symbol of force, which can deter others, but also carry a large number of personnel to carry out transportation tasks such as evacuating overseas Chinese when necessary.

During World War II, aircraft carriers have played a huge role in naval warfare, and then it has established its maritime status, replacing the position of the previous battleship, and now the major powers are vigorously developing aircraft carriers, and the United States has 11 aircraft carrier formations, why aircraft carriers will be favored by the navy?

Why are countries in general reluctant to develop aircraft carriers? Technology is one of the most important reasons for this.

For a country, the most effective deterrent does not come from nuclear **, but from aircraft carriers, aircraft carriers are by far the largest war machine of mankind, after a hundred years of continuous development and improvement, aircraft carriers have also become the most powerful warships in the world, from the end of World War II to the present, the United States maritime power has been the world's first, which is mainly due to the powerful aircraft carrier formation of the United States. However, aircraft carriers are powerful, but there are not many countries in the world that have aircraft carriers, so why is everyone reluctant to develop aircraft carriers?

One of the problems is the technical problem, as the most powerful Russian warship in the world, the internal structure of the aircraft carrier is also the most complex in the world, that is, it is impossible to build an aircraft carrier without strong technology to support it. But what I want to talk about today is another reason, the author believes that this is the main reason why ordinary countries are reluctant to develop aircraft carriers, that is, aircraft carriers are too expensive.

The construction of aircraft carriers looks the same as the construction of ships, but the gap between the two is really very large, and many countries do not have those complex design technologies, welding technologies, etc., and these are generally not exported as state secrets. Of course, the most important thing is the issue of money, let's first look at the cost of the aircraft carrier, take China's Liaoning ship as an example, not counting the money bought, the modification alone cost 12 billion yuan, and the American aircraft carrier is even more sky-high, an ordinary nuclear-powered aircraft carrier costs 3.5 billion US dollars.

The money required for the maintenance of an aircraft carrier in the later period is even more astronomical, and during the service of an aircraft carrier, including the salaries of personnel, daily expenses, etc., the money spent on an aircraft carrier is comparable to the financial revenue of a small country. Therefore, some countries are very envious of countries that have aircraft carriers, and they are also eager to have aircraft carriers, but they are afraid of having aircraft carriers, because they are afraid that they may not be able to afford to build them.

1. Aircraft carriers are becoming more and more complex.

Back then, Russia and Ukraine went to see the aircraft carrier and asked how to complete the construction of the aircraft carrier, and the director of the Makarov plant replied: "The construction of the Varyag requires the Soviet Union, the Soviet Union, the Communist Party, the Central Committee, the country, the plan, the committee, the military, the military, the industry, the committee, and nine ministries, 600 related specialties, and 8,000 supporting manufacturers, in short, a great country is needed to complete him." ”

2. It's getting more and more expensive.

Aircraft carriers are billions of dollars, and carrier-based aircraft are basically $100 million, so aircraft carriers generally need tens of billions of dollars. And the aircraft carrier fleet needs nuclear submarines, 2 Aegis ships, 2 frigates, 1 supply ship! And in the world, those who can get this set of equipment together are the P5 and Japan, Germany, and India.

Except for Japan and Germany, which cannot be equipped with aircraft carriers, all other countries with aircraft carriers!

3. Carrier-based aircraft.

Now there are only 4 countries that can build carrier-based aircraft, China's J-15, and the United States' FA18. Russia has now closed the Su-33 production line and can now only build a light MiG-29. As well as France (Rafale M).

Without carrier-based aircraft, the aircraft carrier is a target!

Why are fewer and fewer countries having aircraft carriers?

Aircraft carriers have gradually become the face of a country's navy, but now the countries in the world that have aircraft carriers can be counted on one hand, and there are many countries that just buy aircraft carriers from other countries, so why are there so few countries that can make aircraft carriers? Is it just because of technology?

In fact, in addition to technology, capital is also very important, the two are half and half, the aircraft carrier is also known as the gold swallowing beast, the annual expenditure on the aircraft carrier alone will account for half of the navy's military expenditure, I believe that the country that manufactures the aircraft carrier has a deep understanding of this, for example, a screw on the Chinese Liaoning ship costs more than 100,000 yuan.

The aircraft carrier not only spends a lot of money on manufacturing, but also takes a lot of time, and the time for the aircraft carrier to form combat effectiveness is really very long, half of which takes nearly 20 years, and the cost of the aircraft carrier is not only allocated to the lives of the soldiers, but also to the maintenance and maintenance of the aircraft carrier, the use of carrier-based aircraft, destroyers, and fuel.

Nuclear-powered aircraft carriers cost more money than conventional aircraft carriers, and Britain announced before that it would not build nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, one is because they no longer have the original ambition and do not need to compete for the ranks of great powers, and the other is that the investment in nuclear aircraft carriers is really prohibitive for them.

There are really few countries that can build aircraft carriers today. There are only two countries in Asia: China and Japan; In the Americas, there is only the United States; There are only six countries in Europe: Britain, France, Italy, Spain, Russia, and Ukraine, and these regions in Africa and the Atlantic, let alone building aircraft carriers, cannot afford to give them away. All countries that can build aircraft carriers, except for Ukraine, have aircraft carriers.

Many countries can't afford to build it, they can't afford to use it, and it has no real combat significance. For example, if Japan has a nuclear bomb and drops it on the United States, it will be the small country that will be destroyed first. Even if it can bomb Washington, so what, Japan will definitely not exist.

Moreover, looking at the economy, almost every province in China has a corresponding European country, and it can even be said that China is a collection of many developed European countries.

I quit my job and couldn't get out.

An aircraft carrier, referred to as an "aircraft carrier", is a large surface ship with carrier-based aircraft as the main one, which can be used for carrier-based aircraft to take off and land. It usually has a huge flight deck and ship islands, most of which are located on the starboard side. Aircraft carriers are one of the largest, most complex and most powerful aircraft carriers in the world, and a symbol of a country's comprehensive national strength.

Modern aircraft carriers are usually divided into large aircraft carriers (more than 60,000 tons), medium aircraft carriers (3-60,000 tons) and small aircraft carriers (less than 30,000 tons) according to the size of the full load displacement; According to the power plant, it can be divided into nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and conventionally powered aircraft carriers.

Up to now, aircraft carriers have become a symbol of a country's comprehensive national strength. Relying on aircraft carriers, a country can exert military pressure and conduct operations far from its homeland, without relying on local airfields.

Build a maritime power! At present, the economic development of the sea needs the support of a strong navy.