It s very realistic that there is no one to accompany you, and you are alone

Take the initiative to go to dinner with them, go shopping, chat, etc

A little bit, nothing to make up! It's going to be fine!

That's not sad, the saddest thing is that you can't do anything you want

It's about the same as me, my world is gray, what color is your world.

I think you're more introverted, insecure. But being alone can help you think better. But you still have to make a few bosom friends in life

Being alone does not mean that you don't have a confidant, and not having a confidant doesn't lead to being alone, in fact, being alone and having a confidant are two different things, if it's really hard for you to meet a confidant, then you can wait, because one day you will definitely have a confidant, even if you don't have a confidant, there should be an object, but being alone is actually a good habit in my opinion.

I am alone most of the time, because I usually don't like to trouble people, but many people often come to me, such as eating together, shopping and watching movies, etc., but most of the time I like to go shopping alone, eat alone, and watch movies alone.

But I don't recommend being alone all the time, the advantage of being alone is to be able to get used to being alone, to be lonely, to be ignored, but the disadvantage is that it is very likely to slowly become withdrawn, which may really lead to no confidant, or even no good friends.

People are still more suitable for social and social lifestyle, I remember that there used to be two years to run around, basically every city will not stay for more than a month, do everything is used to a person, I just carry a package and go everywhere, do not have to worry about the train station to the bathroom no one to see the luggage, because of just a bag, resulting in later settled in a city, or used to do anything by themselves.

Later, I felt that this was still not good, and I still felt a lot worse after a long time, so I tried to go out, participate in some activities that I felt emotionally about, improve my social frequency, and meet friends.

After all, no one knows how bad it is if you have a little sudden death at home!

I often think:Life in the world, three or two confidants, enough.

For me, it's never about having many friends, it's about sincerity. In the world, there are really many people we can know in our lifetime. We deal with different people every day, and you always know what the person in front of you is like.

After a long time, sometimes I feel that it is really tiring to interact with people. Maybe it's because I'm also a person who is afraid of parting, it's really hard to really know and understand someone, and even the roommates you've been with for a few years can't know much about you, let alone the people you just meet every day

For example: Emma Watson - played Hermione in "Harry Potter", I am sure that many people must know her, have seen her upbringing, and really admire her. In addition to her achievements in film and television, she is also enthusiastic about public welfare and often speaks out for feminism.

She once tried to hold a party of more than 100 people at home, inviting all her good friends, but after that, no one uploaded her ** to Facebook for fear of hurting her. It is conceivable that her friend must have done so in a sincere manner.

There is nothing wrong with being alone, but when you meet a friend worth associating, please don't be stingy with your sincerity, because there are few gentlemen's friendships.

Whether it's making friends or doing things, it's always a two-way process, you give, and there will be a day of harvest. But if you only want to make a close friend, but never think about giving, who would want to make friends with you?Between friends, the less the benefits, the better;If there are interests to speak of, I'm afraid this is a shopping mall transaction rather than a process of making friends, right?

Finally, I would like to send you a sentence from "The Kite Runner":For you, thousands of times!

I think that's the creed of friends.

It is impossible for a person to be alone for a lifetime, and it is necessary to make a few more friends.

It's nice to have a personality, but don't be too withdrawn.

Isn't this just asking for comfort?

Probably nothing when you're young!But when you get old, you will be very lonely when you have no one to accompany you, so get married when you meet the right person!Otherwise, parents will be worried.

Yes, why not.

It's just that your parents may be in a hurry ......

And you don't have children and can be lonely ......

But if you think about it and decide, it's totally fine. After all, life is your own.

It's, can you live your own life, what to do when you're old, there's no one to throw a pot when you're gone. People are social animals, you can't be in the mountains and old forests right now. Let's look ahead

Yes, China's social welfare benefits will get better and better.

Live your life and don't care what others think.

Of course, everyone has their own choices, but they are responsible for their own choices.

No, you have to pass on the lineage.

There is a sincere one, but it has nothing to do with you. Friends or something, just to fill the heart, why take it too seriously.

Well, if you can think like that, it means that you are slowly maturing.

I can only say that I haven't met a true friend, but it's also quite difficult.

Is it okay for us to be spiritual friends?

Because friendliness is the basic cultivation of dealing with others, being alone is a personal social choice. These two acts do not conflict.

Strong social skills are advantages, and being alone is not a disadvantage, it is just a habit of our life. In other words, we have different ways of obtaining energy, and there is no superiority or inferiority. Everyone should have their own social circle of like-minded people who feel safe, and this can make our lives a lot better.

Friends are a way to deal with loneliness, so we are friendly, but learning to live with loneliness can make us stronger. Schopenhauer said: The more a man has, the less others can give him.

Most people are ordinary, and the criteria for choosing friends cannot be too high, and there is no need to be too high. Everyone is a rich individual, which can make us gain and understand, and too high a standard often means self-isolation.

You take the initiative to show kindness, and most people will show you kindness as well. No one succeeds in groups, and people who try to break away from the status quo are often lonely, and loneliness allows them to grow. The essence of social networking is the exchange of needs, and each other can provide each other with what they want, whether it is feelings, experience, experience, insight or capital, connections, and vision.

But simply socializing for the sake of socializing, being friendly for the sake of being friendly, and squeezing into the high-class circle, in addition to learning to flattery, it is difficult to get something more profound. Circles based on interests and hobbies are a good channel for us to deeply reach out to people from different walks of life. Your position in a social circle depends more on your actual abilities and resources, rather than mainly on where your social skills are better.

We don't have to be friends with everyone, and we don't need everyone to like us. So we choose to be alone, because it doesn't make sense to force ourselves to fit into any circle in order to look more gregarious. Again, the same sentence:

No one ever goes to success in groups. It all depends on you knowing what you want and working hard to achieve it. If there is a problem with the pace of progress, there is no point in talking about the direction.

Because their friendliness is really friendly, it has no purpose, and it does not require the other party to reciprocate with friendship. His heart is very full, so he doesn't need emotional companionship from the outside world.

What kind of logic is this? People who seem to be friendly, are all in the crowd? But the most contradictions are also in the pile of people, where there are many people, on the contrary, there will be conspiracy, conspiracy, strife, competition, the more people you may see, the less kindness you may see, the more complex human nature you can appreciate.

There will be people who are as good as water, but there will also be wolves in sheep's clothing.

Just because some people are alone doesn't mean they're not kind. They keep a certain distance from others, and it is precisely to maintain this goodness and goodness. If you treat everyone's loneliness as a potential adversary and threat, this is a dangerous Cold War mentality, which can only prove that you are very protective of yourself, not that others are not kind enough.

In today's society, more and more people are concerned about their privacy and are willing to respect the privacy of others. So they keep a certain distance from people, which is based on kindness and elegance. Shouldn't we encourage it?

Only when a person is socially independent can he be fair and objective。In the crowd, it is easiest to form a faction, the easiest to be coerced by forces, the easiest to lose the most objective and standard values, and the easiest to wear out is the most basic kindness of being a person.

Therefore, since ancient times, there have been gentlemen who are cautious and independent, avoid forming gangs and factions in politics, avoid appointing others in group employment, and avoid the supremacy of feelings in work relationships. It is a virtue to be alone. Of course, this kind of solitude is based on self-confidence, objectivity and kindness.

Only a few people go it alone to cover up something purposeful. Usually we say that these people are not above board enough. But that's just a small part of society.

Don't look at people and life with labels or that simplistic arbitrariness. Life is colorful, human nature is complex, and people who are willing to follow the rules are kind.

Friendly, but other people are not, so it's more comfortable to be alone, otherwise it's tiring.

Friendly people don't necessarily have many friends, and loners may be stronger in their hearts and don't need friends in life at all.

Friendliness and loneliness are not in conflict, is it possible that the lonely people in the subject's mind are all bitter and mean bad people?

Because it is more comfortable to live alone, but it does not affect his friendliness towards others, because friendliness is only the basic quality of communication.

I don't need to be accompanied, probably, friendliness is because I have peace of mind, and I like to be alone because I don't like the hustle and bustle, and I don't have conflicts.

Because this kind of person is more indifferent to friendship, and they are very independent, very strong inside, and do not need the company of others.

has been hurt many times intentionally or unintentionally, but his moral bottom line can't do anything to retaliate.

Because being friendly to others is a person who has a better cultivation, and being alone is because this person has a more introverted personality.

Being alone doesn't mean you don't have friends, it doesn't mean you don't need company, many times you think he's alone, but he's not alone, it's not surprising, you're an alternative in his eyes. Not casually interfering and not casually belittling the way of life of others is the quality that a good citizen should have.

Being friendly and being alone are two different things. He knows what kind of friends he makes. Be kind to others not because of anything else, but to give a helping hand without asking for anything in return. It is the most basic humanitarianism of human beings. People who are rich in the inside often need very little affection and material things.

Some people seem to be friendly, but that's just on the outside, but in fact, they are very independent on the inside, and they don't like to socialize.

When you are young, you like to make friends When you are older, you like to be alone.

Friendliness and solitude are not contradictory.

Friendly people don't have a lot of friends, but people who have more friends don't necessarily like to be lively.

Some people, no matter what their status, retain a sense of tranquility in their hearts and like to enjoy the tranquility and tranquility brought by tranquility. But that doesn't mean loneliness, it's a real maturity.

If you don't fit in, you won't be killed! Low-quality gregariousness will kill people, so it's better to be alone!

Sometimes people who are alone do not feel lonely, on the contrary, they enjoy their time alone.

Two years is a lot of changes, maybe it's the roommate's psychology has changed, maybe some of your circumstances have changed that makes them want to be with you, isn't that a very good thing?

In what environment, try to adapt to what environment, do not have too many concerns, do a good job in learning, good relationship, is the last word.