Would this be illegal? Thank you! Seek help! Is this illegal, and who has the advantage?

To put it simply, you sign a contract with the company and you don't want to fulfill it. In this case, you will be liable for breach of contract, and if you have stipulated the liability to be borne at the beginning, then you must follow the agreement. However, if you only wrote such a clause at the beginning and did not stipulate the specific liability for breach of contract, it depends on whether your actual breach of contract really harmed the interests of your original company, and if so, how much damage is there, and if your original company sues you in the future, this will be a factor to be considered by the court.

If you do not harm the interests of the original company, then the original company will not hold you accountable, please do not worry.

Since your contract stipulates that you are not allowed to work in the same industry for two years after leaving the company, then you are not allowed to work in the same industry for two years. Otherwise, you will be liable for the losses caused to that company and pay liquidated damages.

There will be a confidentiality clause in the contract! If so, it's best not to work in the same industry for two years, or do the following preliminary work

Even if there is no confidentiality clause in the contract, as an employee, you should keep the necessary trade secrets for the employer, which is the basic principle of being a person. There are also corresponding provisions in the contract law, that is, the so-called ancillary obligations, as long as the contract is signed, there are obligations that need to be complied with, regardless of whether there is a contract or not. The legal terms take precedence over the contractual terms.

As a prospective boss, you should understand this, do you want your employees to take away your company's customers and other secrets?

Do not do to others what you would not have to do to yourself.

If the vulnerable are protected according to the law, in the end, whether from a moral or legal point of view, they must be biased in favor of the other side.

1: You should make it clear to them as soon as you should go to the hospital, the medical expenses will be borne by the company, if the other party does not agree, you must make it clear that it is not that you are unwilling to pay, but that they do not want to be in time, and all the consequences will be borne by them.

2: The customer is God, and you have the responsibility and obligation to take care of any of your customers.

Your question is against the law.

Hello: You have a sensitive word.

It can only be said that the management is too rubbish.

1. What is the reason why you can't deliver the house this time, because of the developer or because of yourself?

2. However, if the house is accepted, the liquidated damages will be calculated from the date of acceptance.

3. If you do not accept it, then you can ask for 1) delivery of the house 2) payment of liquidated damages to the actual delivery date.

4. When filing a case, the original does not need to be original, but a copy is sufficient, and the other party may also provide the original when the court is held.

If you have any other questions, you can go to our "Shanghai Legal Counsel" post.

Now you have the right to decide how to deal with this issue, mainly depending on how you think about it;

If you don't want the house, you can sue the developer for breach of contract and move out;

If you want a house, you will ask the developer to pay liquidated damages in the name of the other party's breach of contract.

It is also good to sue the developer after taking over the house, because if there is no original contract, it is difficult for the court to confirm the defendant's qualifications. The original document will be required at the time of prosecution.

Sensitive Issues: Sensitive Topics,

Sometimes it's not for the content, it's for your account, and I've been targeted for a long time, and suddenly it's fine. Be all abroad.