How did the customer respond to the customer s question that the dish was driven away by the store s

Nowadays, we can see some people often holding their mobile phones to shoot at others on the short ** platform, which is very rude. And we have to know that if you shoot without someone else's consent, if you use it for commercial purposes, then it must be illegal. Therefore, if you shoot without the permission of others, then you are infringing on the portrait rights of others, and I hope that everyone can correct this bad problem.

Some people are just very annoying, no one else has done anything wrong, or someone else is wearing a dress, and some people are filming others on the Internet. And there was a customer who found that the pork knuckle rice he ordered was different from the one on ** when he was eating. So she took her mobile phone to ask the staff, in fact, if we are good at talking to others, others can also answer for us.

And this woman's final behavior also made the merchant give her a free order, when the customer was discussing with the merchant, a clerk made a grimace to drive the customer away, so the customer felt very angry.

But if the customer didn't directly use his mobile phone to shoot others, others wouldn't do it. Anyway, I don't like to encounter something very much, so I take my mobile phone to shoot on the Internet, and others sometimes cause a lot of trouble to others. There are a lot of people who are bothered by this kind of thing, and what we have to do is manage our own hands.

If you feel that you are unhappy, you can actually say it, but don't take pictures of others with your mobile phone. The store responded that when we first started, this aunt also talked to the customer well, but when the customer took pictures of this aunt with his mobile phone, the aunt was unhappy, so she made a grimace.

The store said that these people's behavior is very hateful, and they shoot others for no reason, hurting other people's portrait rights, and at the same time, there is a certain gap between many foods and **.

Nowadays, we can see people on the short ** platform who often hold their mobile phones and shoot at others. It would be rude to do so. And, we must know that if it is used without the consent of others, and it is used for commercial purposes, then it must be illegal.

Therefore, if you shoot without the permission of others, you infringe on the portrait rights of others. At the same time, I hope that everyone will be able to correct this serious problem.

The shopkeeper's response was that the waiter was too tired. It's not because of mental illness or anything else, it's simply because of dissatisfaction with the customer's behavior.

Many times when we go to dinner, we know**For reference only, and **is just a reference thing for us to order this dish, and no one will believe it**. In Yantai, Shandong, when a customer was eating, he found that his food was not related to the above, so he asked the owner of the store to theorize. At that time, the staff in the store not only did not help the customer solve the problem, but also drove the customer to make faces and so on.

This incident happened on December 28th, when a customer came to this store for dinner, he ordered a pig's knuckle rice, but after the pig's knuckle rice came up, he found that it had nothing to do with the ** above, so he was very angry and went to the boss to theorize. After this incident was posted on the Internet, many netizens said that you think that the ** on some instant noodles is the same as the inside of instant noodles, so his behavior is completely funny.

At that time, when the customer went to ask the boss again, he had been using his mobile phone to shoot the person, so many netizens felt very bad, if you feel that you have been deceived, you can go to discuss with the merchant, but there is no need to use the mobile phone to shoot at others. If you really suffer a loss, you can go to the merchant to theorize, but it is really not good to always use your mobile phone to shoot others.

The merchant's behavior did bring some bad things to the customer, but the customer kept using his mobile phone to shoot the merchant when he was looking for the merchant to theorize. He did not have the consent of others, and it can be said that this is already an infringement of portrait rights, and if we want to be respected by others, we must first make ourselves respect others.

In the end, the merchant also returned the money to the certifying customer, and also gave the customer a boiled egg. In real life, if we feel that we have been deceived, we can go to the police to deal with it, and we can also find a business to theorize, but don't hold a mobile phone to shoot everything, which will bring some losses to others.

The merchant's behavior will definitely cause harm to the customer, but the matter cannot be generalized, and the merchant has also made a claim but the customer insists on taking a picture to cause conflict. If both the merchant and the customer can communicate well, this will not happen.

Yes. The merchant's behavior of making faces to drive away customers is very inappropriate and causes psychological damage to customers.

This kind of behavior of the merchant will definitely cause some harm to the customer, and he will happily spend money on a meal, but he will still be very unfamiliar psychologically and even angry when he encounters such courtesy.

Of course, the merchant's behavior has caused harm to the customer, after all, the customer has the right to question the amount of food in the store. However, the merchant uses the ghost to drive the customer away. This is very wrong.

It will definitely hurt. Not only did the store not apologize for its mistakes, but it also took the action to drive away customers. If it were me, I would definitely complain.

Be. It is too unethical for the merchant to do this, and it will leave a shadow on the psychology of the customer, and the customer can sue the merchant.

I think the merchant's behavior has really caused harm to the customer, and it is really unreasonable behavior.

Yes. Because the behavior of this merchant is particularly excessive, it is a disrespectful practice for customers.

It definitely hurt. Because this behavior of the merchant did not respect the customer, it caused harm to the customer.

When we ordered takeout, we ordered it directly because we saw that ** was particularly delicious. But after ordering, it is very different from what you eat, and the ingredients in it will not be the same, which is why you should look at it according to the actual situation. On December 28, 2020, a customer in Shandong was driven away by the clerk when he came to a restaurant for dinner.

At that time, the clerk made a direct grimace and wanted to scare the customer away, and everyone felt that the clerk's approach was really wrong.

Customers come to the store to eat, and if they directly pretend to be ghosts and scare people away, then the business in their own store will also be affected to a certain extent. This customer wants to order pork knuckle rice when he comes to the restaurant to eat, but ** is different from the actual situation, and it is very rare. At that time, this customer kept talking about this matter, and there was a conflict in the store.

In order to be able to drive the customer away, the clerk directly wanted to drive the customer away.

In fact, this ** was filmed a year ago, so the amount will definitely be very different from before. At that time, in order to solve this matter, the store also refunded it directly, and even gave a braised egg. For this store, there is a loss.

At present, the clerk has realized his mistake and will not do some bad things, which will have a certain impact on the store. In fact, if there is a conflict with those people in the store, there is no need to post it on the Internet. If that's going to make the business in that store worse, and people won't come to eat there.

I have already received the corresponding compensation, and I should not make this matter public, and this customer's approach can be said to be very wrong. In our lives, there are actually a lot of inconsistencies in the real thing, ** was originally very good-looking, but because he has a filter, and the reason that things will be magnified when shooting, the items photographed are seriously inconsistent with the real thing. When we eat, we still have to take the real thing as the standard, don't believe it**.

Very much. When you go to eat, you will find that the actual things are completely different from the things on the **.

**There are many cases of inconsistencies with the actual product, especially in the promotion of instant noodles. This is also the case in hotels.

Many, the meals on the restaurant menu are all photographed by professional photographers, and the real thing does not match **.

There are too many such phenomena, because many times some goods will shoot ** very well and pass the beautification, but when you get the real thing, it is very different from **.

** Inconsistent with the real thing, this phenomenon is very numerous. When ordering takeaway platforms, we will see that most of the ** are beautified, and when the real takeaway arrives, we will find that the difference is still very big.