Could animals change the world without humans?

In the past 4.5 billion years, there have been no human beings on the earth, and life still exists on the earth. Life has existed on Earth for billions of years. Dinosaurs and other animals have lived on Earth for more than 100 million years, while humans have lived only a few million years.

Human beings have survived on the earth and created the glory of life, but they have also brought great damage to the ecological environment. It can be said that there are no human beings on the earth, and life is not so brilliant, but it may be more suitable for other life forms.

Because our human survival also occupies a large part of the land area, then after the absence of humans, some wild plants will recover. Another animal will also be reborn, with free space, free predation, and the survival of the strong. Therefore, it is very likely that in 1 billion years, there will be no trace of human existence on the earth, and it will become a vibrant planet of animals and plants.

Scientists have also studied this issue in depth, believing that if there were no humans on Earth, there would be great changes in 1 billion years. First of all, under the continuous development of science and technology, the high technology created by human beings has no human control. There is also the fact that the fuel will stop working after it runs out, and the nuclear reactions around the world will face strikes, which will lead to **, ** and then bring unimaginable disasters, first of all, the atmosphere and rivers will be polluted and severe radiation.

The earth has been born for hundreds of millions of years, and the years of our human existence, but only a few million years, are not worth mentioning when comparing the years of the earth. In fact, if the time of human development is only more than 200,000 years, there is still a modern society like the present. But it is precisely because of the emergence of human beings that the earth has also undergone a lot of changes, for example, since the industrial revolution, we have continuously demanded the earth's resources, which has indeed damaged the earth's environment.

If there were no humans, there might be other animals that evolved more advanced and changed the world.

It should be difficult, because the human brain is more developed and has a greater ability to change.

Yes, if it weren't for humans, animals might have evolved into something that could change the world.

If it weren't for humans, animals could change the world, but it's unlikely.

Without humans, it is possible for animals to change the world, and animals may evolve into something that can change the world.

Yes, because animals evolve, animals may evolve into something that can change the world.

It can be changed, but time is slow, and animals also have certain thoughts.

It's not like that, for example, in the previous dinosaur era, dinosaurs didn't change the world.

If there were no animals in the world, 1. there would be no human beings, and human beings evolved from ancient mammals. 2. The diversity of organisms will be affected and the ecosystem will be destroyed, because many plants rely on animals to spread pollen and seeds. 3. Human psychological problems, as shown by the "Biosphere II" experiment in the United States.

What would the world be like if there were no humans and animals on Earth? Without animals, plants and microorganisms will multiply rapidly, especially those plants and microorganisms with strong reproductive ability will quickly occupy a large number of living resources and living space, the entire food chain collapses, and then slowly form a new food chain, and finally after a long time, some plants or microorganisms will evolve into animals, gradually forming a biological chain similar to the present, but it is definitely different from the current animals.

If there are no animals, it will cause ecological imbalance and lead to environmental change. The home on which humanity depends will also disappear.

Without animals, not only human beings, but the entire ecosystem would not be able to function, because without a biological chain, the entire ecosystem would not be able to sustain it.

It would also be difficult for humans to survive on earth without animals because the relationship between humans and animals is very close. It's an interdependent relationship.

What would humans do if there were no animals? In this world, there will be animals if there are people. Animals, like people, survive. If someone doesn't move, it means that the world doesn't exist.

Animals play the role of consumers in the ecosystem, and they are indispensable in the ecosystem, together with producers, decomposers, and inorganic environments, to form the ecosystem.

Humans are animals, too. Why do you ask this? Humans are higher animals.

1. There would be no human beings, human beings evolved from ancient mammals. x0d2, which affects biological diversity and destroys ecosystems, because many plants rely on animals to spread pollen and seeds. x0d3, human psychological problems, the United States' "Biosphere II" experiment showed this.

Generally speaking, the reason why human beings want to protect animals is also because of the protection of the ecological environment, so the ecology needs a balanceIf human beings do not protect biological animals to interrupt this balance, it will eventually destroy human beings themselves, so it is precisely because of this that animals will be protected and nature will be cared for, mainly because of the following reasons. <>

1. Maintaining biodiversity systems is necessary to protect nature, and if humans do not protect animals, it will lead to the collapse of the food chain. In fact, for us, the survival of a variety of organisms on the earth must need a certain space, if human beings do not protect animals, then it will lead to certain problems in the food chain, and will also indirectly affect all organisms, which is why we will choose to protect organisms, and the protection of organisms itself is also a way to maintain biodiversity and protect the ecological environment. <>

2. If humans do not protect animals, excessive hunting will easily lead to the collapse of the food chain and eventually destroy human beings. In fact, for us, if human beings do not protect animals too much, then eventually human beings will also perish, and human beings and animals and plants themselves are part of nature, and if this balance is broken, then there will be a series of disasters, and eventually human beings will also be harmed. <>

3. The protection of animals is based on the ecological concept, and the harmony between people and animals is conducive to the common establishment of a good global environment. In fact, for us, the protection of animals is also based on the ecological concept of human beings, and the harmony between people and animals can help people better survive on the earth, once this balance is broken, then it will lead to the collapse of the food chain, and the disappearance of species will also cause a series of changes, which will affect the external environment, and eventually contribute to disasters, and eventually will destroy human beings themselves.

In fact, for us, human protection of animals is actually to protect human beings, because animals are also part of the entire ecological chain, if people break such a balance, it will bring a series of disasters, and it is human beings themselves who will be harmed in the end.

Human beings are inseparable from animals in terms of clothing, food, housing and transportation, and without animals not only human beings cannot live, but also the ecosystem will be out of balance.

Aren't there a lot of animals that we eat now? And people often don't eat meat, and they will have problems, milk, eggs, and so on, not all of them are provided by animals.

Yes. And it's good to answer that some parts of animals can be used medicinally, and if the animal is gone, many diseases cannot be cured (mice can also be used for experiments.) ）

There are a lot of inventions that are borrowed from animal structures, like biomimicry, and biomimicry still plays a big role in human society.

Anyway, it's a lot of harm. Anyway, I can't imagine what it would be like if I didn't eat meat all the time. It is said that even monks eat vegetarian meat.

If you don't have animals, you will lose your ecological balance.

Sooner or later, one day human beings squander the earth's resources so much, which will lead to the deterioration of the climate and the total extinction of human beingsMaybe humans won't disappear, but they will also move to another planet to find a suitable place to live, if humans disappear, on Earth I think primates should be able to replace humans as the leaders of the earth, such as orangutan monkeys, such animals have a higher IQ and can use some simple tools, so they can be the head of the earth on earth.

Don't think that the earth can still live for thousands of years or tens of thousands of years, according to this environment, hundreds of years have become a problem, Australia's bushfires, from 2019 to 2020, this huge fire has caused huge pollution to the earth, for a highly developed country like the West caused such consequences, you should really realize your mistakes.

Because this wildfire is completely man-made, our earth is a common home, so every country, every human being should not do their part to protect the earth, so the United Nations environmental protection organization is also calling on all countries to make more contributions to environmental protection. In fact, we in China have paid a lot for environmental protection, and we all know that in recent years, some companies that do not meet the emission standards of heavy industry have been shut down.

Even if there is economic growth in the local area, such companies are not allowed to continue to survive, and the local government is also accelerating the pace of reducing carbon emissions and planting trees, which are some of the measures that each of us Chinese has made in an effort to protect the environmentThe most hateful thing is that some countries that always want to start a war, relying on their position as the world boss, always bullying others, I didn't know that war is a huge destruction for the earth.

I feel like it's primates like monkeys, orangutans, because these animals are the most intelligent animals besides people, almost humans do, and they do, so, most likely.

Primates, especially orangutans, may become more and more intelligent over time, and eventually be able to invent and use technology just like humans.

Personally, I think that after the disappearance of humans, the animals that will replace humans as the first animal on the planet are: the first animal, the octopus, and the second is the land creature ant. The third is the orangutan.

Chimpanzees, chimpanzees are close relatives of humans, they have high intelligence, they have a certain ability to think and understand, they know how to imitate, they also know how to cause and effect, they can use simple tools, and even simple communication.

I think it's an orangutan. Because his movements and postures are very similar to humans, and maybe their IQ is also similar to humans, and through slow evolution, he will become more and more like humans, and thus become the head of the earth.

I think the primate may not be large, just compare it with the ape superfamily, which is the closest to Homo sapiens, and the living habits and lifestyles are relatively similar to those of humans, so the extinction of humans will inevitably lead to their extinction. For example, after the extinction of the dinosaurs, they were succeeded by mammals. Therefore, it is very likely that the species that will replace humans in the future will be the relatively weak species now.

Rats are the first in the genus, and they are also the most adaptable. So if humans are gone, they should be rats.

It is impossible for primates to inherit humans to rule the earth, and if you think that people who are a hundred times smarter than orangutans and monkeys are extinct, how can it be their turn? I suspect that none of the existing species on Earth will be the first of the planet, and that a significant number of them will go extinct along with humans. Then after a long period of time, a new species will emerge to take the place of the overlord of the planet.

Perhaps a level better than the presence of chordates. Mammals will be like reptiles last extinct.

The dominant creature of the new era, most likely the underground life form, the civilization on the ground, will cease to exist.