Seeking master s understanding of translation from the three aspects of linguistic knowledge, non l

Translations are understood linguistically; in the process of our human development. There are many languages, each of which is a tool for communication, but depending on the environment in which we live. We have developed different languages.

We have a communication barrier. hindering the transmission of our information. So we use language translation.

Translate other languages into the languages we know. This is a communication that transcends language barriers.

Translate non-linguistic understanding of us non-verbal. It is the act of using our facial expressions and movements to convey information and emotions. We sometimes can convey our inner thoughts and messages to others without having to speak.

But due to the difference in the knowledge and abilities of each person. Not everyone is receptive to the other's non-verbal expressions. Then.

This is where non-verbal translation comes in. Probably refers to the implicit non-verbal representations we make of the other person. Explain to others.

Analytically. Analytically speaking, translation. It can be equated with a kind of deduction, an act of discovering the laws of things, and we can dig out the inner part of some external phenomena by analyzing them.

And deduction is to tell others what we have excavated. to inspire others.

Sum up. Translation has these three meanings. But in reality. Our translation is all about switching one language from another.

Turn one language into another.

So: pinyin] nà me

Definition] demonstrative pronouns. Indicates the status, manner, extent, etc. Demonstrative pronoun. Indicate the quantity. Conjunction. It means that in accordance with the above meaning, the due result or judgment should be made.

So: pinyin] suǒ yǐ

Interpretation] indicates causality and is often used in conjunction with "because". To; For. Refers to a genuine reason or appropriate action. Cause; Sake.

Language is a tool for thinking, and if you want to think, you have to use a language. Ordinary people may not say it, but you can try it if you're not there.

From the perspective of wind and rain constraints, the problem should be relatively solvable.

Do you have any more specific requirements? I feel that this can be analyzed from the perspective of phonology, using the addition and subtraction of sounds, syllabics, and so on.

This is a matter of translation.

Top question.

The field of translation, not just literature, but all translation, has these problems. The essence is very simple, S represents the source text, T represents the translation, and there are only three possibilities:

t=stsOnly t=s is the best translation, which is very difficult to achieve, according to the complex theory and the entropy increase theory: the information content of the translated text is definitely not equal to the information content of the source text, which is the law.

However, t>s is wrong! Marx Einstein cannot be translated as higher than Marx Einstein! None of the translations can be translated, they are all wrong.

There is only one left, and the conclusion is that there is no right translation, only varying degrees of error; There is no good, only different degrees of badness!