The property management changed the access without the consent of the owner

Yes. 1. Fire Protection Law: Article 28 No unit or individual shall damage, misappropriate, or dismantle or stop using fire-fighting facilities and equipment without authorization, and shall not bury, occupy, or block fire hydrants or occupy fire spacing, and shall not occupy, block, or close evacuation channels, safety exits, and fire truck passages.

Doors and windows in crowded places shall not be equipped with obstacles that affect escape and fire fighting and rescue.

Article 60: Where a unit violates the provisions of this Law by committing any of the following acts, it shall be ordered to make corrections and shall be fined between 5,000 and 50,000 RMB:

1) The configuration and setting of fire-fighting facilities, equipment or fire safety signs do not conform to national standards or industry standards, or are not kept intact and effective;

2) Damage, misappropriation, or unauthorized dismantling or dismantling of fire-fighting facilities and equipment;

3) Occupying, blocking, or closing evacuation passages or safety exits, or engaging in other conduct that impedes safe evacuation;

4) Burying, occupying, or blocking fire hydrants or occupying fire spacing;

5) occupying, blocking, or closing the passage of fire trucks, obstructing the passage of fire trucks;

6) Setting up obstacles on doors and windows in crowded places that affect escape and fire fighting and rescue;

7) Failure to take timely measures to eliminate fire hazards after being notified by the fire department of the public security organ.

Where individuals exhibit any of the conduct in items (2), (3), (4), or (5) of the preceding paragraph, they are to be given a warning or a fine of up to 500 RMB.

Where there is conduct in items (3), (4), (5), or (6) of the first paragraph of this article, and corrections are refused after being ordered to make corrections, compulsory enforcement is to be carried out, and the costs required are to be borne by the violator.

2. Property Law: Article 83 The owner shall abide by the laws, regulations and management regulations.

The general meeting of owners and the owners' committee have the right to require the perpetrator to stop the infringement, eliminate the danger, remove the nuisance and compensate for the loss in accordance with laws, regulations and management regulations for acts that harm the lawful rights and interests of others, such as arbitrarily disposing of garbage, discharging pollutants or noise, raising animals in violation of regulations, building in violation of regulations, encroaching on passages, refusing to pay property fees, etc. Owners may file a lawsuit in the people's court in accordance with law for acts that infringe upon their lawful rights and interests.

If the negotiation with the property is unsuccessful, go to the relevant department of the real estate bureau to complain.

Summary. Hello <>

The developer has violated the relevant provisions of the Property Management Ordinance by replacing the property without the consent of the owner. According to the regulations, property management service enterprises shall follow the principle of marketization, sign property service contracts with owners in accordance with the law, and publicize the relevant property service charging standards to the owners before signing, and listen to the opinions of the owners. If the developer changes the property without the owner's consent, the owner can take the following steps:

1.Negotiate with the developer: First, the owner can negotiate with the developer to request the restoration of the original property services.

In the process of negotiation, you should stay calm and try your best to fight for your own rights and interests. 2.Complaints:

If the negotiation fails, the owner can file a complaint with the local real estate management department or consumer association and ask them to intervene in mediation. These agencies can regulate and penalize developers. 3.

Prosecution: If none of the above methods are effective, the owner can protect his legitimate rights and interests by suing. In a lawsuit, evidence needs to be provided to prove that the developer's actions were unlawful.

The developer has not obtained the consent of the owner to replace the property.

Hello <>

The developer has violated the relevant provisions of the Property Management Ordinance by replacing the property without the consent of the owner. According to the regulations, property management service enterprises shall follow the principle of marketization, sign property service contracts with property owners in accordance with the law, and publicize the relevant property service fee standards to the owners before signing, and listen to the opinions of the owners. If the developer changes the property without the consent of the owner, the owner can take the following measures:

1.Negotiate with the developer: First, the owner can negotiate with the developer to request the restoration of the original property services.

In the process of negotiation, you should stay calm and try your best to fight for your own rights and interests. 2.Complaints:

If the negotiation fails, the owner can file a complaint with the local real estate management department or consumer association and ask them to mediate the mediation. These agencies can regulate and penalize developers. 3.

Prosecution: If none of the above methods are effective, the owner can protect his legitimate rights and interests by suing. In a lawsuit, evidence needs to be provided to prove that the developer's actions were unlawful.

In addition to the above methods, owners can also protect their own rights and interests through a variety of ways, such as seeking help from social groups. In the process of rights protection, owners need to pay attention to protecting their legitimate rights and interests, and at the same time, they must also avoid illegal acts of Huai belt. <>

Dear, is there anything else you don't understand? Tell me more about your situation and I'll answer for you. <>