Why anti tank stacks can stop tanks from advancing

The principle of anti-tank cone "anti-tank" is to use the three smooth sides of the tri-prism to make the powerful tank easily slide up, and when the chassis of the tank reaches the top of the triangular prism, that is, a ridge at the top, the ground of the tank is uneven, so it is easy to get stuck on this stone pillar. Once the tank slides onto such a triangular prism, it can only get out with the help of its companions, or by luck. Because, the Mitsubishi column is about half a meter high, and the tank is stuck on it, which means that the front or rear of the tank is supported by a very stable tripod.

Although half of the supported tank is still on the ground, it is unlikely that the other half of the supported tank will be dragged off the bracket, especially if it is stuck on such a column when it is backwards. Because most of the tank's driving wheels are rear-mounted, once the rear is jammed, then even a tracked tank has no chance of losing power.

At present, this anti-tank cone is only suitable for the kind of high-attrition warfare of the Second World War. Even now, when used in conjunction with anti-tank mines and anti-tank trenches, the effect is very limited. After all, these obstacles are no longer "moats" in the face of mechanized and efficient engineers.

Look at the snow leopard too! I feel that because the anti-tank cone is made of concrete, it is very strong. And the tank has no wheels, only a chain and only runs all the way, and the concrete just stops, and the tank can't be coaxed, so it can prevent the tank from passing!

Stuck tracks are one aspect, the key is the slope and spire, because it is slightly higher than the ground, and climbing to a certain extent will support it, causing the tank track to idle and not coming down.

Anti-tank mines mainly attack the tracks of tanks, and if the tracks of tanks are broken, it is a fixed battery, and the infantry can get rid of them.

Look at the snow leopard, the cone is broken and the chain is stuck in the wheel. Unable to move forward.

It's the same with tanks.

The first tank was a bulldozer with steel plates.

Now it's time to return military technology to civilian bulldozers.

The British Abbott 105mm self-propelled howitzer began to be developed in 1958, and the first batch of 12 prototypes was made in 1961. Used by the troops in 1966. After testing, it was finalized as the Abbott 105mm self-propelled howitzer.

The howitzers are mainly equipped with the Indian Army (68 guns) for direct fire support missions and can also be used to attack armored targets. Performance characteristics: Good off-road maneuverability.

The turret has good protection performance and can prevent damage from bullets and shell fragments. Equipped with the Fez fire control system, the fire reaction time is short, and the shooting accuracy is high. It has a variety of suitable ammunition and can carry out a variety of shooting missions.

You can compare.

This is not a tank, it is a British "Abbott" 105-mm self-propelled howitzer, thank you.

Not much clear what you're asking.

Tank Common sense invented by Britain during World War I.