How to write the opening argument of the pros and cons debate draft and the opposing argument?

I can only say some things simply, and find my own information to supplement.

Positive and negative needs: The spirit of Lei Feng is helpful to the current construction and improves the quality of the whole people.

Prevention does not need: market economy, economy first. Outdated.

The purpose of the opening is very simple, mainly to explain one's own point of view, and as a negative one, you can also refute the bias in the opening of the positive side. The details are as follows:

1. Theoretical traceability, explanation of concepts, at this time we need the guidance or corroboration of theories.

We should give full play to the role of theory in practice, combine theory with debate topics, and play the role of throwing bricks and attracting jade and clearing up the source. But to be clear, theory covers not only the universally accepted theorems and laws, but also the famous police bags of politicians, writers, and democrats.

2. In the value of reality, the establishment of the positions of both sides, the theories of all parties give evidence, and the important position in the opening is the affirmation and elaboration of the value of the position, if there is no value of his own hand, the position will appear fragile, and the attack will appear weak. Therefore, it is important to highlight the value of the position.

3. Comparison of the best, there are differences in the positions of the two sides of the debate, and there is naturally a comparison. The basic theory contains more than the basic laws that I agree to in my manuscript. Arguing that there are differences in each other's views, comparisons can highlight key priorities, and can express whether there is a difference, and whether it should or should not be applied.

Only by comparing can we better demonstrate the importance of question types. Find our strengths in the link of comparing each other's points of view, and learn from each other's strengths. It is possible to integrate the use value.

Analyze the principle and compare the strengths of your own point of view with the disadvantages of the other.

4. Draw conclusions and conclude the debate.

Benefits of Debate Tournaments:

Thinking skills. be improved. By participating in the debate competition, you can see the problem more deeply, no longer stay on the superficial surface, you can see the deeper things of the problem, and you can see the problem from multiple angles.

The language is more artistic. After participating in several debate competitions, many students have gone from being speechless on the court at the beginning to being witty and quoting scriptures, often using famous quotes.

and rhetorical devices.

Increased resilience. In the debate competition, there is often a situation where the opponent's debater throws a question that you have not thought of at all, and then it is a test of your adaptability.

Debate can make people have a deeper level of thinking about social problems and phenomena, and the debate competition has one more purpose, which is to cultivate the ability and awareness of teamwork, in addition, make real friends, the real society, everyone wears a mask to behave, and the debate competition can understand the true thoughts of teammates in the process of preparation, and true friends have always been dealt with through the exchange of hearts.

Square: 1If a person often has lies in his mouth to deceive others, over time, he will lose people's trust.

2.The "lie" itself is dark, and the white lie itself is falsehood. Although he took off the cheongsam worn by the beggar, he still could not escape the essence of his lie, and a lie meant deception, and thus hindered integrity.

The starting point of a white lie is good, but often once this lie is exposed, the damage to the other party will be deeper. 3.In my opinion, distrusting others is not only irresponsible to oneself, but also disrespectful to others, and even to others, causing losses to the interests of the collective.

The most important thing is to lose the trust of others. 4.Zi said:

People have no faith, and they don't know what they can do. "I think that if people don't be trustworthy, they will have no place in society and they will not be able to do anything. A "lie" is called a "lie" because it is a false, untrue, and deceitful word.

If a person often has lies in his mouth to deceive others, over time, he will lose people's trust. 5.Another point is that if you tell a lie, it may use many more lies to round that lie, and there is a high probability that lying will become a habit, and lying, it will be like a snowball, and it will get bigger and bigger.

Opposite: 1White lies are beautiful, and when we tell small lies in moderation for the sake of the happiness and hope of others, lies become understanding, respect, and tolerance.

Who doesn't want to be understood, respected, and tolerated? So, I think it's still necessary to tell a few white lies in our lives. 2.

White lies, all kinds of white lies from the starting point and result, are all to protect the other party's emotions, maintain the other party's mental health and pleasure, and are a kind of humanistic spirit. Because of the existence of white lies, the world will become better, warmer and more harmonious, and the world will be full of sunshine. 3.

When a terminally ill patient is sentenced to death by doctors, his parents, lovers, children, and all his relatives will not directly tell him: "Life cannot be saved" or "At most, how long can I live in this world?" They all use white lies to encourage patients, so that they can cooperate with the doctors, and the opposing party can't blame these people for being dishonest, right?

Although these are all truths, who would be so cruel as a judge to sentence a prisoner to death, telling the truth to his relatives who are already sick? Is this an undermine to integrity?