If you pick up a son, as an adopted son, your adopted son is not filial. Is it illegal for adoptive

If you pick up a son, as an adopted son, but the adopted son is not filial. It is not illegal for adoptive parents not to give property to their adopted son.

It is the right and freedom of the individual to dispose of one's own property as one wishes. It is also possible to make a will, adopt a son who is not filial, and donate property.

"Adoption" refers to the legal act of a natural person adopting another person's child as his own child and lawfully creating a legal act of simulating the identity of a blood kinship. The adoption relationship created by the legal act of adoptive status is a fictitious parent-child relationship of blood relatives, and it is an identity legal relationship that occurs based on the legal effect of the act of adoption. This kind of parent-child relationship of fictitious blood relatives has the same rights and obligations as natural blood relatives.

Article 1111 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: From the date on which the adoptive relationship is established, the provisions of this Law on the relationship between parents and children shall apply to the relationship of rights and obligations between adoptive parents and adoptive children; The provisions of this Law on the close kinship relationship between children and their parents apply to the relationship of rights and obligations between adopted children and the close relatives of their adoptive parents.

The relationship of rights and obligations between the adopted child and his or her biological parents and other close relatives shall be extinguished by the establishment of the adoption relationship.

Article 1118:After the adoptive relationship is dissolved, adult adopted children who have been raised by their adoptive parents shall be paid living expenses to the adoptive parents who lack the ability to work and lack livelihood. Where the adoptive relationship is dissolved due to abuse or abandonment of the adoptive parents by the adoptive child after he or she reaches adulthood, the adoptive parents may request that the adoptive child compensate for the maintenance expenses incurred during the adoption period.

Where the biological parents request the dissolution of the adoption relationship, the adoptive parents may request that the biological parents appropriately compensate for the maintenance expenses incurred during the adoption period; However, there is an exception for the dissolution of the adoptive relationship due to the abuse or abandonment of the adoptive child by the adoptive parents.

Article 1127 Inheritance shall be inherited in the following order:

1) First order: spouse, children, parents;

2) Second order: siblings, grandparents, maternal grandparents.

After the inheritance begins, it is inherited by the first-order heirs, and the second-order heirs do not inherit; If there is no first-order heir, the second-order heir shall inherit.

For the purposes of this Part, the term "children" includes legitimate children, children born out of wedlock, adopted children and dependent stepchildren.

For the purposes of this Part, the term "parents" includes biological parents, adoptive parents and step-parents in a dependent relationship.

The term "siblings" as used in this Part includes siblings of the same parents, half-siblings or half-siblings, adoptive siblings, and step-siblings who have a dependent relationship.

Article 1125:Where an heir commits any of the following acts, he or she shall lose the right of inheritance:

1) Intentionally killing the decedent;

2) killing other heirs for the purpose of competing for an inheritance;

3) Abandoning the decedent, or abusing the decedent, where the circumstances are serious;

4) Falsifying, tampering with, concealing, or destroying a will, where the circumstances are serious;

5) Using fraud or coercion to compel or obstruct the decedent's establishment, modification, or revocation of the will, where the circumstances are serious.

Where the heirs have the conduct in items (3) through (5) of the preceding paragraph, and truly show repentance, and the decedent expresses forgiveness or later lists them as heirs in the will, the heirs do not lose their inheritance rights.

Where the legatee has the conduct provided for in the first paragraph of this article, he or she loses the right to receive the bequest.

It is the right and freedom of the individual not to break the law, to dispose of one's own property, to dispose of it as oneself wishes. If it breaks the heart. The severance of the adoptive paternity relationship may be declared. No more entanglement. It is also possible to make a will, adopt a son who is not filial, and donate property.

Our inheritance law is clearly defined in this regard.

Parents have the right to dispose of their property freely. That is, parents may give their property to their children, or to other people other than their children, or to other societies; It is also possible to leave not a penny to the children, and give all the money to other people or organizations other than the children.

Of course, the distribution can be disposed of while the parents are alive. If you want to stay after death to distribute the estate, you need to make a will to distribute your property and appoint heirs through a will.

Therefore, adoptive parents have every right not to share their property among their adopted sons. No distinction, completely legal.

Not illegal. Because by raising him, you have fulfilled your obligations as a parent. Whether or not to divide his property depends entirely on his own will, and he has the right to distribute his property. However, in order to properly handle family relations, it is necessary to consider all aspects and handle them carefully, with the main purpose of creating a harmonious family atmosphere.

If you pick up a son, as an adopted son and an unfilial son, it is not illegal for the adoptive parents not to give the property to the adopted son, the adoptive parents' property has their own rights, and they can give it to whoever they want, and the adopted son is an unfilial son who can not share the property with him, and it is not illegal.

Things are your own, the decision is in your hands, and you decide who you want to give it to, so it is not illegal to say that adoptive parents do not divide property among their adopted sons.

The son he picked up raised him, it is already a great grace, the adopted son is not filial, you can not share the family property with him, this is not illegal, even if his own son does not give him the family property, he has nothing to say, you have the right to dispose of the family property by yourself.

Not illegal. It is up to the parents themselves to decide who to give their property to and not to whom, to whom and how to distribute it. Just leave a will. Not to mention picking up a son and raising him. And the adopted son does not know how to repay the favor, and the property can be completely not distributed to him.

It is not illegal to say that the adoptive parents do not give the property to the adopted son, if it is not illegal to give it to the biological child, the parents can inherit it after death, and if the parents are still allotting their own property by their rights, and the children are not filial, they can donate it to the welfare home.

If you pick up a son, and the adopted son is not filial to his parents, he can not distribute property to the child. Because the property of the parents belongs to the private property of the individual, he has the right not to give it to the children.

Not illegal. Because the responsibility is coexisting between the two parties, the adoptive son is not filial to the responsibility, and the adoptive parents can dispose of the property according to their own wishes.

It is not illegal, as long as it is the true will of the adoptive parents and notarized by a regular notary office, it can be punished by the court and obtained through the court ruling.

This is not illegal, the property is all their own, and how to distribute it is up to them, and there is no law on how to divide the property.

Not breaking the law. The decedent has the right to freely distribute his or her estate during his lifetime, so he can make a will to prevent his adopted son from inheriting. In addition, you can provide evidence of the unfilial piety of the adopted son, and if he does not fulfill his obligation to support you, then you can also give him no or less share when distributing the inheritance.

If you pick up a son and raise him up, is it illegal for this son to be unfilial, and the adoptive parents do not give the property to this adopted son? Such adoptive parents, doing so, is not illegal. Because the adopted son does not know how to repay the favor, he loses his humanity and violates the law, and he will not only be condemned by morality, but also punished by the law.

The property of his adoptive parents will not be distributed to him, there is a law. If the adopted son is not satisfied, he can go to the law firm and ask the lawyer, and he will understand.

Authentically, if Yang Zi doesn't laugh in this situation, you can come up with sufficient evidence to prove it. Sheep are not filial. Then you can write it in your will. It is okay to give the distribution part of the property to Yang Zi, but it should be necessary to show evidence in law.

Parents have the right to distribute their own property to their children, which children they like to distribute, and the adopted son is also your son, so consider carefully.

First of all, it depends on whether your adopted child has been filed with the Civil Affairs Bureau, just say whether he is legally adopted, if it is a legal adoption, it is illegal for him not to support you, if you only pick up a child from the side and don't even have surgery, he doesn't itch, isn't it normal?

This must not be illegal, if the property of his parents is to be given to whomever he wants? You don't have to give it to your child, not to mention that you still cut it!

Hello, the law does not stipulate that parents must divide property to their children, not to mention that even if the adopted son is his own son, the law will not be able to control you if you do not divide the property.

Whether it is an adopted son or a biological son, it is not illegal not to give him property. Because the property is your own, you can do whatever you want.

As an adopted son who is not filial, it is okay not to give him property, even if he is a biological son, his parents also have the right not to give him property.

The adopted son has the legal right of inheritance, but it can be circumvented by testamentary inheritance and other means, and it is not illegal not to divide the property among the adopted son.

Adoptive parents can make a will for a directional distribution of their property. There is no need to leave it to unfilial sons, this is legal and reasonable.

Whether or not to give property to children is entirely the autonomy of parents, and parents do not violate the law if they do not give their children property.

This should not be considered illegal, because the adopted child is not filial, and it is normal for the adoptive parents not to divide the property for her.

To whom are the parents' property willing to give to whom? Even if it is a biological son, the unfilial property will not be distributed to him, and it will not violate the law, and all the property of the parents has the right to dispose of themselves.

The property is your own, and even your own son can not give it, so what you are doing is not illegal.

Whether it is a biological son or an adopted son, it is your son, and the property should be divided.

It is not illegal because even if it is a biological property, it can be designated by the head of the family.

[Legal Analysis].

It is illegal for a son not to support his parents, and the child has the obligation to support his parents, and when the child fails to fulfill the obligation of support, the parent who is unable to work or has difficulties in living has the right to demand maintenance from the child. The obligation of a child to support his or her parents occurs not only between a legitimate child and his or her parents, but also between an illegitimate child and his or her biological parents, between an adopted child and his or her adoptive parents, and between a stepchild and a stepparent who has fulfilled the obligation of support and education. Whether it is at the legal level or at the moral level, it is illegal for an adult son not to support his parents, when the son has not yet reached the age of majority, he is not yet able to support his parents, when he reaches the age of age, he should bear the maintenance obligations stipulated by the law, and if he fails to fulfill his obligations, he will be punished by the law and compelled to perform his obligations.

Legal basis] Article 1067 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: Where parents do not perform their obligation to support them, minor children or adult children who cannot live independently have the right to demand that their parents pay child support. Parents who fail to perform their obligation to support their adult children, who lack the ability to work or who have difficulties in living, have the right to demand maintenance from their adult children.

It is illegal for children not to support their parents.

The 26th article of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China.

Parents have a duty to upbring, educate and protect their minor children.

Adult children have an obligation to their parents to support, support and protect them.

It is not legal for a son not to support his parents. Adult children have the obligation to support their parents, and if adult children do not fulfill their maintenance obligations, parents who lack the ability to work or have difficulties in living have the right to demand alimony from their adult children.

1. How to refuse the obligation of maintenance.

It is an offence to refuse to fulfil the obligation of maintenance. If a child does not support his or her parents, he or she will not only be morally condemned, but will also have to bear certain civil and criminal legal liabilities.

Parents who fail to fulfill their obligation to support their adult children, who lack the ability to work or who have difficulties in living, have the right to demand that their adult children pay alimony.

A person who has the obligation to support a child but has the ability to support but does not do so, causing his parents to commit suicide due to abandonment, etc., and even constitutes a crime, shall be investigated for criminal responsibility for the crime of abandonment in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Law.

2. What to do if you refuse to pay parental support.

According to Article 1067 of the Civil Code (effective January 1, 2021), if the parents fail to fulfill the obligation to support them, the minor children or adult children who cannot live independently have the right to request the parents to pay child support. Parents who fail to fulfill their obligation to support their adult children, or who lack the ability to work or who have difficulties in living, have the right to demand maintenance from their adult children.

It can be seen from this that adult children have the obligation to support their parents, and parents who lack the ability to work or have difficulties in living can demand alimony from their adult children.

3. Does a married daughter have an obligation to support her parents?

A married daughter has an obligation to support her parents, and her obligation to support her parents will not be affected by the daughter's marriage. According to the relevant provisions of the Civil Code, adult children have the obligation to support, support and protect their parents, and if the adult children do not fulfill their maintenance obligations, parents who lack the ability to work or have difficulties in living have the right to demand alimony from their adult children. It can be seen from this that even if a daughter is married, she still has the obligation to support, support and protect her parents.

There is no direct link between a daughter's marriage and her support for her parents. Therefore, a married daughter has an obligation to support her parents.