Brain teaser , solve, solve, brain teaser.

The 1st and 2nd hunters, wolves, men and children go to the other side and drop the children.

3rd Hunter, Wolf, Man Put down the man.

The 4th Hunter, Wolf, Woman Drop the woman.

The fifth hunter, wolf, woman child put down the child.

The sixth hunter, wolf, woman and child disembarked together.

Women and men go first. Men come back, men and wolves over. The man came back with a small child. The woman returned, the woman and the hunter too. The hunter comes back with the child. That's all over.

Women and men go first. Men come back, men and wolves over. The man came back with a small child. The woman returned, the woman and the hunter too. The hunter comes back with the child. That's all over.

Hunters, wolves cross the river.

The hunter returned, and the hunter and a small child of the man passed.

The hunter returns. Men and men's children passed.

The man is back. Men and women in the past.

Let the man walk away with his child.

The woman is back. Let's get the same as above.

The first time the man crossed the river with him and his two children, and the man returned.

The second time is when the man crosses the river with the hunter and the wolf, and the man returns.

The third time is when the man takes the woman and one of the woman's children, and both the man and the woman return.

Eventually, the man and the woman and one of the woman's children came together.

Isn't there a lot of times like this, I think it should be like this.

Winter melon, cucumber, watermelon, pumpkin can be eaten, what melon can not be eaten?

Answer: Fool.

Can you turn ice into water as fast as you can?

Answer: Put "ice."

Removing two points from the word, it becomes "water."

Lao Wang had to shave his face forty or fifty times a day, but he still had a beard on his face. What is the reason for this?

Answer: Lao Wang is a barber.

There is a word that everyone will mispronounce when they see it. What is this word?

Answer: It's "False."

What is the word that does not have to be typed with effort?

Answer: yawn.

45*2+100=190

Buy 2 pairs = 2 pairs for white.

Swap fake money for = lose 100

The sum of the above is the answer.

130 yuan, that is, 90 yuan for the purchase plus 40 yuan for finding, if you really don't know, then assume you have 200 yuan, and then go through the process to make it clear.

Real loss, 130! Calculation, 90 ten 100 two 190, 100 a 40 two 60 (real money), 190 a 60 two 130

At first: 10 yuan per person for A, B and C, a total of 30

Finally: A, B and C are 1 yuan per person, a total of 3 yuan, the waiter is 2 yuan, and the boss is 25 yuan. The total is still 30 yuan.

The questions are ——— by changing concepts

Let's look at this formula 3 x 9 = 27 yuan + 2 yuan hidden by the waiter = 29 yuan——— A, B and C take out 27 yuan (net), of which 2 yuan is in the hands of the waiter and 25 yuan is in the hands of the boss——— The formula of the title confuses one of the directions of consumption and 27 yuan!! I wonder if Brother Tai understands?

This is misleading.

They only paid 27 yuan, 25 yuan for the boss, 2 yuan for the waiter, and 2 yuan for the waiter, which would be 25+2+3 if it was 30 yuan

It can't be counted as the title, there is a logical error here.

This is a sophistry, and there is no such thing as 1 yuan.

By the time the waiter paid back, the concept of $30 no longer existed.

If each person returns 1 yuan, there will be 27 yuan, 25 yuan at the boss's place, and 2 yuan at the waiter's place.

It would have been clear that the main reasons were in two places:

It's not right, because there is already money hidden by the waiter in the 27 yuan.

It is absurd to hate the 1 yuan because the previous concept of 30 yuan has long ceased to exist.

This question has to be reversed.

It shows that no one gave 10 yuan, a total of 30 yuan.

The boss recovered five dollars.

That is, the accommodation fee is 25 yuan.

The next thing is the three yuan returned, and the two yuan for the waiter.

In other words, one dollar is at the boss's.

Outflow:

The three people spent a total of 30 yuan, and recovered 3 yuan, and the total expenditure was 30-3 = 27 yuan of capital inflow:

The boss received 30 yuan, retrieved 5 yuan, the total income is 30-5 = 25 yuan, the waiter got a total of 5 yuan, and returned 3 yuan, the total income is 5-3 = 2 yuan, that is: outflow 27 = inflow 25 + 2

This topic mainly disturbs people's minds, and the two pieces taken by the waiter are themselves part of the 27 pieces.

It's you who miscalculated, the money is not less. The logic in the question is confused.