Why did the professor of Peking University call for the resumption of burial, and do you agree?

Because cremation is still a serious pollution to the atmosphere, but I think burial also has its disadvantages, after all, there is not a lot of land now.

I don't think it's necessary to restore burial, it will affect the environment, and there may be infectious diseases, so the proposal to restore burial is unrealistic, so it's better to continue to practice cremation.

There is no need, death is just a useless body, cremation is the most environmentally friendly way, burial will waste land resources, if you go up the mountain to sweep the tomb in the future, it is easy to cause the danger of burning paper money to cause mountain fires.

Support the restoration of burials. Restore traditional culture, cremation is more polluting to the environment, more land occupation, restore burial, no tombstones are allowed, and plant a tree on it, which is more environmentally friendly.

There is no need, cremation and burial have their own benefits, there is no need to force others to do it, and the wishes of the deceased must be respected.

You are all from big cities, and you don't know what the countryside is like, so you really don't have a backache when you stand and talk.

Chinese culture is broad and profound, with a long history, and in the more than 5,000 years of history of our country, it has formed a very distinctive Chinese culture.

And in my Chinese culture, filial piety is a very important culture. It can be said that since ancient times, our country has always attached great importance to filial piety, and we often say that the parents of the body should not be damaged at will. So, in the same way, what about our parents, we can do whatever it takes to hurt their bodies?

I don't think that's a no-brainer. For example, in the current situation, the old man in the family has passed away, and then according to the regulations of the state, it may be necessary to take him to the crematorium for cremation, so for us, is it destroying the body of our relatives?

At the same time, we often call the deceased great, don't let the deceased suffer any more torture or whatever, and what does the deceased think in his heart before he dies? If he thought that after his death, his body would be stuffed into the fire and burned, then what kind of feeling would his heart be like, I am afraid it would not be pleasant.

When cremation was first implemented with pistons, the state required very strict, and at the beginning of that time, the people did not accept it, and then we had a lot of that kind of secret burial, that is, secretly burying people, and then after being discovered, it was directly the local branch The scene looked very scary.

Then there were a lot of unpleasant things, not why did you implement cremation in the first place, the country, the family said that it can save land area, after all, burial, after birth, there may be an urn left directly buried in the ground, that can save space, it is best not to set up a grave.

But hopefully this is not the case at all, if we are around, even after the cremation, then the coffin will not think much of it, and then it will be like that anyway, for the peasants, it just costs more money, and then their relatives have to be pulled to be burned, and it is very uncomfortable in my heart.

Burial so what about burial, we just talked about it, whether it is cremation or burial, in our rural graves are the same size, and the coffins are the same size.

So if the soil environment is not good, first of all, the human body will degrade, and the coffin will also degrade and degrade naturally, which will not be harmful to suddenly.

Suffice it to say, from an environmental point of view, burial is better than cremation. I think from my perspective as a rural person, everyone is still very willing to be buried, after all, cremation is just an additional trouble for us, and at the same time, it costs more money, and then our relatives will be burned, and in the end we still have to build such a big grave.

Peking University professor called for the resumption of burial, I think burial is more environmentally friendly because after the burial, wait until a few hundred years later, the corpse of the person will directly decay, and there is no harm to the environment, and cremation will produce a certain amount of smoke to the environment, which is polluting to the environment.

Praise said that the restoration of burial, cremation is frightening, burning people as garbage is a great disrespect to people, but also more polluting the environment, burial is more convenient for future generations to send the sorrow of the ancestors, so many people who died in the troubled times were buried in the ground and did not occupy any land, because the grave can be flattened after a hundred years, but now a piece of marble tombstones occupy more land.

1. Cremated but still buried again, still occupying land. Second, the cost of cremation is prohibitively high.

3. The tradition of the Chinese People's Brigade is to be buried in the earth, and cremating the body is a great disrespect to the deceased.

Fourth, urban people have no land, they can buy it, and there is a market when there is demand.

5. Reduce air pollution and be more environmentally friendly.

I suggest cremation, the burial body will rot, the soil will produce the virus, and after a long time, the virus god will be produced, and it will burrow into the person, which is the new coronavirus.

roots.

What professor, the country's policies and laws have been formulated, do you want to change it according to your imagination, isn't cremation environmentally friendly, may I ask if the graves of your ancestors are in **, no one can find them, why should people harm the living when they die,

Cremation is more environmentally friendly. Because burials occupy more space, it is better to leave land resources for the living to survive, and burials are also corrupt and may damage the environment.

I think burial is better than cremation, and the smell of cremation will definitely pollute the environment. The farmers are still unwilling to be cremated, some ask for money to buy a license, some are secretly buried, and they are found to be stealing by the local ** and have to be fined for picking up the corpse. Even after the cremation, it is necessary to buy a coffin and set up a grave.

Not only does it not save, but it also wastes. There is also no saving of land. Why bother.

For each person to be buried, a monument should be erected, and it should also be occupied. A lot of land, leaving a lot of trouble for children, no matter where you are during the Qingming Festival, you have to go back to burn paper. After cremation, the ashes are scattered into the mountains, forests, rivers, and seas.

The Qingming Festival only needs to be expressed at home. Human beings are too small to be worth mentioning in nature.

Peking University professors have called for the restoration of burials, which are more environmentally friendly than cremation, but some people's traditional beliefs do not support this practice.

It should be absorbed and buried in Islamic cotton white cloth, not allowed to use coffins, and be buried deep in the green space demarcated by **, cut trees on the side, environmental protection, and plant a tree when a person dies! Eco-friendly!

This professor considers humanization, which is completely correct, it should be buried for the dead, respect for the dead, protect the whole body, cremation is not an ethical act, and people are still so hurt when they die.

Very much in favor of burial! From the historical and cultural inheritance! Make your loved ones more psychologically acceptable! And eco-friendly and economical!

This Peking University professor is too wise! We kudos to him! It is indeed good to be buried! I hope that the state will implement this initiative!!

I am more in favor of tree burial, you can choose the hillside, do not occupy the land, do not need to engrave the monument, and plant trees on the upper slope for commemoration. That is, there is no air pollution from cremation, and it reduces the disadvantages of land being occupied by large areas, so why not.

That's right! Life is a process. It is right to return to nature, cremation is not scientific to pollute the environment, buy a cemetery. It is still necessary to buy a cemetery, and the cemetery is expensive. Originally, cremation violated the natural laws of man.

Cremation is more polluting than burial, with cremation ashes being dusty through chimneys and sticky contaminants on the leaves of nearby vegetable gardens and trees.

The burial is good, it is necessary to plant trees on the deep burial, and the greening environment is equivalent to not occupying the land, and people die and grow into trees, and future generations will remember the old people when they see the trees, and people will become a forest after they die.

Cremation or burial should be adapted to local conditions, not one-size-fits-all, rural burial is more suitable, and urban cremation can be done.

Supporting burial, mainly environmental protection, there is historical precipitation, you can see the current history and culture after a few years, and the current archaeology is not to study the human flavors and history of the predecessors? The burial is a return to nature, and what is left behind by cremation, and what has been scraped in just a few years and decades? Cement, concrete, what will future generations eat, live, and where can they grow food?

Not for today, but for future generations!

Funeral ceremonies have existed since ancient times in our country, and it can be said that it is the traditional culture of our country. There have been rituals to bury relatives in our country since primitive times, but with the passage of time, funeral rituals in our country have become more and more formalized. However, with the development of the times, and because of the scarcity of land resources, many people advocated the abolition of burials and the ban on cremation.

However, whether it is a matter of traditional civilization or cost, cremation should not be used to outlaw burial.

1. Burial is one of the traditional cultures of our country Professor Peking University believes that cremation should not be used to ban burial, and burial should be restored, because burial, as one of the traditional cultures of China, represents a kind of inheritance of traditional culture. The custom of burial can also indicate that it is a continuation of the feelings of the younger generations for the ancestors. Compared with burial, cremation lacks a sense of ritual and lacks a kind of inheritance of traditional culture.

Burials have been around for a long time, and there must be a reason why they can exist for thousands of years.

Second, cremation pollutes the environment and covers a large areaAs far as cremation is concerned, the process of cremation is actually relatively large pollution to the environment, and after cremation, it is necessary to put the ashes into the cemetery. Some people say that the area occupied by burials is not small, but with the passage of time, the burial graves will gradually disappear, and the area occupied will have no place to stand.

3. Cremation is disrespectful to the deceased, and the professor of Peking University also believes that cremation is disrespectful to the deceased, and burning people like garbage is a desecration of the deceased. Personally, I still prefer to be buried, and after cremation, it needs to be placed in the cemetery, and today's cemeteries are becoming more and more expensive because of the problem of land resources, and some places are beyond the acceptable range of ordinary people. In fact, it can be considered according to the actual situation, after all, everyone's concept is different, some people are more in favor of burial, while some people prefer cremation.

If it is for the sake of the environment or from all aspects, burial should indeed be completely outlawed by cremation.

Burial should be completely replaced by cremation, as burial not only takes up a lot of land, but it can also contaminate the soil.

This statement is false. Because the contradiction between man and land is very serious, and burial will occupy a large amount of urban land, it is not recommended to restore this method of burial.

It should not be outlawed, because burial is still very environmentally damaging, and the best option now should be cremation.

The professor of Peking University suggested the resumption of burial, I personally believe that burial should not be completely banned by cremation, there has always been a saying in our hometown that burial is peaceful, and it is also a kind of thought and a deep-rooted ritual, and I personally hope that it will not be banned.

It should be outlawed, because burial is very consuming of land resources, especially in today's increasingly precious land resources, this traditional practice should be banned by cremation.

Personally, I think that burial and cremation are just a form of concern for the dead by future generations, how to bury people after death is unconscious for the dead people, there are too many modern people, and burials are too wasteful of land.

I think cremation is cleaner and more civilized. Burial is indeed said to be buried for peace, but it also has a great impact on the location of the land and the local land and residents, and cremation avoids that embarrassing way. I still advocate cremation.

Regarding the Peking University professor's call for the resumption of burial in his speech, is cremation disrespectful to the deceased? In my opinion, cremation is not disrespectful to the deceased, burial will harm the ecological environment, it is a pollution of the ecological environment. The fire is able to keep the deceased forever and let them rest in eternal peace, while the burial will one day always be disturbed by others, and cremation will never be disturbed by others.

In my opinion, the true respect for the deceased is the respect from the heart, not the formal respect. The difference between cremation and burial is that the cremation expo is polluted to nature, and burial is a kind of pollution to nature, burial will harm nature, we can't do this kind of thing, the real respect for the deceased is to let the deceased not be disturbed by outsiders, this is the respect for the deceased. <>

These are all external objects, and the real respect from the heart is the respect for the deceased. In my opinion, these external objects are nothing, as long as we respect the deceased from the bottom of our hearts. This is the greatest respect for the deceased, not caring about these external objects, external forms of practice, so whether it is burial or cremation, as long as we respect the deceased from the heart, it is the greatest respect for the deceased.

In general, whether it is burial or cremation, these are basically external formal practices, and the respect for the deceased is from the heart, not these. No matter how good the external form is, if the heart does not respect the deceased, then no matter how good these external forms are, it is also disrespectful to the deceased, and cremation is actually the best way for the deceased, because cremation will not cause pollution to nature, nor will it cause harm to nature. And burial will cause pollution of nature, which is a kind of disrespect for the deceased.

It is also harmful to nature, and we cannot do this kind of harm to nature, nor can we disrespect the deceased.