How about relieving welding stress compared to Hawke energy aging?

Both ultrasonic impact and Howker aging are used to relieve welding stress. However, the ultrasonic impact energy is small and the output is unstable, so in the process of using the equipment, one part of the product may be treated well, and the other part may be treated poorly, which is not easy to control, and it is easy to lead to the generation of some waste products. Hawke energy aging, high frequency, high energy, good focus, stable performance, completely eliminate welding stress, and produce ideal compressive stress.

The timeliness is 90%-100%. At present, only Shandong Huayun has this kind of equipment.

1. The ultrasonic impact energy is small and the output is unstable, so in the process of using the equipment, one part of the product may be handled well, and the other part may be treated poorly, which is not easy to control, which can easily lead to the generation of some waste products.

2. Welding stress is the stress generated by welding components due to welding. The internal stresses generated in the weldment during the welding process and the change in the shape and size of the weldment caused by the thermal process of welding. The uneven temperature field of the welding process and the local plastic deformation and the different specific volume of the structure caused by it are the root causes of welding stress and deformation.

When the uneven temperature field caused by welding has not disappeared, this stress and deformation in the weldment is called transient welding stress and deformation; The stress and deformation after the disappearance of the welding temperature field is called residual welding stress and deformation. In the absence of external forces, the welding stress is balanced inside the weldment. Welding stress and deformation can affect the function and appearance of weldments under certain conditions, so they are issues that must be considered in design and manufacturing.

Damaging the reputation of others and making others think less of them infringes on the right to reputation of others.

Hello bai, I think it was your neighbor and mother-in-law who quarreled, and they didn't do it

On the big dao because of this matter

Fight and even go to court. I think it must have been something wrong with your mother-in-law at the beginning, and the neighbors will do this. After all, neighbors, don't hurt each other, so how to be neighbors in the future! It is recommended to make the big things small, and the small things to the small.

What is the right to reputation.

Reputation is divided into the reputation of a citizen and the reputation of a legal person. A citizen's reputation refers to the comprehensive evaluation of a particular citizen's character, ability, credibility, merit, seniority, and identity by society or others. The reputation of a citizen is directly related to his or her status, dignity and credibility in society, and may have an impact on his or her participation in civil and other social activities.

The reputation of a legal person is a comprehensive evaluation of the legal person's property status, industry prestige, credit, brand, culture and other images. The reputation of a legal person is also directly related to the legal person's activities in society and the development of its business.

Article 101 of the General Principles of the Civil Law stipulates that citizens and legal persons enjoy the right to reputation, and the personal dignity of citizens is protected by law, and it is forbidden to damage the reputation of citizens and legal persons by means of insult or slander.

The right to reputation is the right of citizens and legal persons to protect their reputation in accordance with the provisions of the law.

The right to reputation has the following characteristics:

As a legal right, the legal right to reputation is provided for and protected by law. The right of reputation is inseparable from the person, and this right reflects that the self-worth of each civil subject is recognized by society and protected by law. China's "General Principles of Civil Law" stipulates:

Citizens and legal persons enjoy the right to reputation. "It is forbidden to damage the reputation of citizens and legal persons by insulting or slandering them. "This is a direct legal provision for the protection of the right to reputation.

At the same time, because people's concept of reputation and the public's evaluation criteria are determined by the dominant legal consciousness in society, reputation itself has legal significance.

The exclusive right to personal reputation is a kind of personal right, which is inseparable from the personal rights of citizens and legal persons. Citizens have the right to reputation from the date of their birth, and legal persons have the right to reputation from the date of their establishment, and they are protected by law and can only be acquired by legal means. The right of reputation is one of the prerequisites for civil subjects to carry out civil activities, and civil subjects enjoy exclusive and exclusive rights to their right of reputation, which cannot be transferred.

As a kind of personality right, the right to reputation is not property in itself, has no value, and cannot bring direct economic benefits. However, there is a close relationship between the right of reputation and property, because the right of reputation is directly related to the acquisition of other civil rights of citizens or legal persons, so it also affects the gains and losses of the property of civil subjects.

Infringement of the right to reputation can cause two types of damage.

1. Property damage. In the case of infringement of the right to reputation, the victim may also suffer damage to his or her property. In such cases, compensation shall be made on the basis of actual losses.

2. Mental damage.

1. The Supreme People's Court will unify the standard of compensation for moral damages: the amount of compensation for moral damages that infringe on the right to life of others can be compensated for 20 years in accordance with the average wage standard of employees in the previous year in the region. where the victim is under the age of 16, one year is reduced for each year younger, with a minimum of not less than five years; For those over 60 years of age, each additional year shall be reduced by one year, with a minimum of not less than 5 years.

The amount of compensation for moral damages that infringe on the right to health of others is to be reduced with reference to the standard for compensation for moral damages that infringe on the right to life, but the age of the victim is not to be used as a consideration. Where the physical rights of others are violated, the amount of compensation is to be determined with reference to the compensation standards for violations of mental personality rights.

2. Where the mental personality rights of others are infringed, the amount of compensation will be determined according to the following criteria: for serious mental damages, the amount of compensation for solatium is divided into five levels: 50,000 yuan, 40,000 yuan, 30,000 yuan, 20,000 yuan, and 10,000 yuan; For general mental damages, the amount of compensation is divided into four levels: 8,000 yuan, 6,000 yuan, 4,000 yuan and 2,000 yuan. Where the right to reputation, honor, and so forth are infringed upon, refer to the provisions of the preceding paragraph or give appropriate leniency.

1. The act carried out by the perpetrator is illegal.

2. The victim enterprise has indeed had its reputation damaged.

Including reducing the social evaluation of corporate goodwill by consumers and the public.

3. There is a causal relationship between the infringement and the consequences of the damage.

4. The perpetrator is subjectively at fault.

The difference between the right to honor and the right to reputation is as follows:

1.The main body is different. The subject of the right to honor is specific, and it is only enjoyed by civil subjects who have received honorable titles or awards; The right to reputation is a personal right enjoyed by all civil subjects.

2.The subject matter is different. The object of the right of honor is honorary titles, certificates, medals, medals, certificates, etc., while the object of the right of honor is the public's social evaluation of others.

3.The procedure for obtaining it is different. The right to honor is obtained through the procedures of the relevant organs or units for awarding honors, while the acquisition of the right of honor does not require special procedures such as conferring honors, and it is naturally enjoyed.

4.Whether it can be canceled or deprived is different. The right to honor may be deprived in accordance with the law, and the right to reputation cannot be deprived in any way.

5.The way of infringement is different. Honor is mainly to deny, belittle, desecrate the honor of others, etc., or illegally deprive others of their honor, while infringement of the right to reputation is mainly insult and slander.

1. Although the right to reputation and the right to honor are both personality rights, there is a difference between them.

2. Citizens and legal persons without exception enjoy the right to reputation, which refers to the comprehensive evaluation of the morality, sentiment, ability, prestige, reputation and image of individual citizens and the credibility and image of legal persons. The right to reputation is the right enjoyed by citizens and legal persons to retain and protect their own reputation.

3. The right of honor can only be enjoyed by citizens and legal persons who have made outstanding contributions to the country and society or have made outstanding achievements and have been awarded honorary titles. According to Article 102 of the General Principles of the Civil Law of China, there is only one way to infringe on the right to honor, that is, to illegally deprive citizens or legal persons of their honorary titles. Honorary titles show that the state and society highly regard the recipient of the honor, and therefore are associated with honor.

If a citizen's honorary title is unlawfully deprived, causing damage to the citizen's reputation, it constitutes an infringement of the right to honor and the right to reputation.

Extended Content:

In order to protect their right to reputation, citizens must pay attention to the following points:

It is necessary to grasp the basis for determining the infringement of the right to reputation. Infringement of the right to reputation is mainly manifested in two ways: insult and slander, and insult refers to the use of violence, verbal, written or other means to publicly insult others, harming the personal dignity of others. The infringed party must keep the evidence of the infringement, and when necessary, fix the evidence through notarization, appraisal, etc.

The infringed party may request the infringer to terminate the infringement and compensate for the losses. A public apology may be requested, the adverse impact caused by the infringement may be publicly eliminated, and the reputation may be restored, and the infringer may also be required to compensate for losses. If the infringer ignores the citizen's request, the citizen can file a lawsuit in court.

According to Article 120 of the General Principles of the Civil Law, when a citizen's right to reputation is infringed, the victim has the right to demand that the infringement be stopped, that the reputation be restored, that the impact be eliminated, that the damage be made, that the victim apologize, and that he or she may claim compensation for the loss.

The right to reputation is the right that people enjoy in accordance with the law to objectively evaluate themselves and to exclude infringement by others.

The right to honor refers to the right enjoyed by citizens and legal persons to receive honorable titles or other honors for their outstanding contributions or special labor achievements.

Compared with the right to reputation, the right to honor shows the credibility and evaluation of civil subjects in society, and to a certain extent, it shows relevance. But the right to honor and the right to honor are two different concepts. Specifically, it is manifested in:

1) The right of reputation is the social evaluation of the parties by the general public, and the general evaluation and external recognition of the citizens by the society; The right of honor is not obtained by every member of society, it is the recognition of a specific subject by a specific organization, and only certain people who have made outstanding contributions will receive honorary titles; The right to reputation is enjoyed by every citizen or legal person and is universal.

2) the achievement of honors must go through a specific procedure before they can be awarded; There is no need to go through any formalities to obtain the reputation.

3) The right of honor may be deprived by the awarding unit for statutory reasons; The right to reputation cannot be denied or restricted.

The right to reputation refers to the right of a citizen or legal person to maintain and maintain his or her reputation. It is a type of personality right. These preserved reputations refer to reputations with human dignity, which are important elements of personality and are protected by law.

The right to honor refers to the right of citizens and legal persons to receive the honorary title or other honors of honor for their outstanding contributions or special labor achievements.

There are two characteristics: First, the object of the right of honor is the honor itself and the interests contained in the honor itself. Honor itself is a formal social evaluation, and it is the object of honor rights.

In the same way, the interests contained in honor are also the object of the right to honor. Second, the right to honor is both a vested right and a right of expectation. The vested right of honor is manifested in the exclusive right of the holder of honor over the honor he has obtained and the interests he has obtained, and any other person has an inviolable legal obligation to the object of this right.

The right of expectation of honor, that is, the right to obtain honor, when the subject of the right to receive honor meets the legal conditions, and the organization has not awarded it the honor, it can claim the honor it should receive from the organization. The object of the right to obtain honor is also the object of honor, so it does not affect the consistency of the object of the right of honor.

The right to honor belongs to the right of identity, while the right to reputation belongs to the right of personality. To distinguish them, it is simply that not everyone has the right to honor, but everyone has the right to honor.

The differences between the right to reputation and the right to honor are mainly manifested in the following aspects: First, they are different in nature. The right to honor belongs to the right of identity, while the right to reputation belongs to the right of personality.

The right to honour can only be enjoyed by those subjects who have made outstanding achievements and contributions in a certain field and have received honorary titles, while the right to honour is a universal right enjoyed by every citizen and legal person. Therefore, the right of reputation is always enjoyed by the subject and has exclusivity, and once the right to reputation is lost, it will be difficult for the independent personality of the subject to continue to exist. The right to honor is different, and the fact that the subject does not enjoy the right to honor does not affect the existence of the subject's qualifications.

The law prohibits the unlawful deprivation of honorary titles of citizens and legal persons, but if the conduct of the entity indicates that others should continue to enjoy a certain honorary title, or violates the provisions on conferring honorary titles, the relevant administrative organs and social organizations may deprive them of their honorary titles in accordance with law. Although such deprivation leads to the loss of the subject's right to honor, it does not negate the existence of the subject's independent personality. Second, the subject matter is different.

The right to honor is the right to enjoy the honorary title conferred by the state or social organization on a certain subject. The right of reputation is the right enjoyed by the subject in terms of good social evaluation of its character and ability. Reputation and honorary titles have a certain relationship, for example, obtaining a certain honorary title means that the subject has obtained a good social evaluation in a certain aspect, and the loss of a certain honorary title will also reduce its social evaluation to a certain extent.

In this sense, honor is a special kind of honor. However, it should be noted that honor is different from reputation after all, and reputation is a comprehensive evaluation of the value of personality and the evaluation of the public, rather than an evaluation made by an administrative organ or social organization. Honors, on the other hand, are generated after state organs or social organizations evaluate the achievements or contributions of a certain subject in a certain aspect and confer certain honorary titles on the subject. If the subject has made certain achievements and contributions in a certain aspect, even if it has not won a certain honorary title, it can still obtain a good social evaluation and enjoy a good reputation.

It can be seen that there is still a difference between honor and reputation. Third, the way of obtaining it is different. The right to honor is a right that can only be obtained by the subject in accordance with the provisions of the law, according to his own labor and contributions, and after being granted by a state organ or social organization.

For example, according to Article 13 of the Regulations on the Organization of the People's Mediation Committee, when the mediation committee and the mediation committee members make certain achievements in their work, the people at all levels can award them honorary titles according to certain procedures. The right to honor can only be obtained if the subject has made certain acts and contributions and is awarded an honorary title in accordance with the prescribed procedures. The right to reputation is a right enjoyed by law for every subject.

It is a right that the subject should enjoy after it is created or established and can be obtained without the need for the subject to perform certain acts.