Some people say that the Song Dynasty was bad, why are the textbooks only in the prosperous era of t

Some people say that the Song Dynasty is powerful, but it is only limited to a certain aspect, and the Song Dynasty has surpassed many dynasties, such as the economy and scientific and technological inventions, and the Song Dynasty has surpassed many dynasties, even the Tang Dynasty. However, in terms of national status and comprehensive national strength, the Song Dynasty and the Tang Dynasty were far from comparable.

We know that the Kaiyuan Dynasty was a period when the power of the Tang Dynasty reached its peak. In that period, it can be said that all countries came to the court, and the four seas were peaceful. All the countries of the world know that there is a very powerful country in that land.

However, the Song Dynasty did not make other countries feel very powerful, but was amazed that they were economically developed and did not have a high international status and international reputation, so it is very reasonable that only the Tang Dynasty appeared in the textbooks, which is a correct understanding and judgment of history, and a recognition and appraisal of history.

From another point of view, the economy of the Tang Dynasty was very developed when it was in the prosperous era of the Yuan Dynasty, not only with the northerners, but also with the barbarians in the south, and from the Silk Road. It can be seen that the economy at that time was not worse than that of the Song Dynasty, and the Song Dynasty was called powerful because he attached great importance to economic development throughout his reign, while the Tang Dynasty emphasized economic development and military development. In contrast, his military development is more than economic development, so the light of economic development is covered by military development.

Moreover, in the prosperous era of the Kaiyuan Dynasty, the diplomacy of the Tang Dynasty was that others came to worship me, while the diplomacy of the Song Dynasty was that I went to make peace with others, and the difference between the two was very big. The Tang Dynasty came from other countries to establish diplomatic relations with us, while the Song Dynasty went to seek peace with other countries and cede land and pay compensation. Therefore, only the prosperous era of the Kaiyuan Dynasty appears in the textbooks, because the prosperous era of the Kaiyuan Dynasty was not only economically strong, militarily strong, and the national status was strong, but it far surpassed the Song Dynasty in all aspects, and the Song Dynasty was only relatively economically developed.

Although the Song Dynasty was also very powerful, in terms of comprehensive strength, the Song Dynasty and the Tang Dynasty were far from comparable. Li Longji is stained with the light of the ancestors of the Tang Dynasty, and also stained with the foundation left by Wu Zetian, plus his own governance, mixed together to achieve this prosperous era.

Although the Song Dynasty was very powerful at that time, the Kaiyuan Dynasty was the richest period at that time, so this situation occurred.

Because the Tang Dynasty was all-round powerful, whether it was political, economic or cultural foreign exchanges, it was very good, but the military of the Song Dynasty was not very good, poor and weak, and not as good as the Tang Dynasty.

The Song Dynasty did not unify the Central Plains in history, and made great achievements in the economic aspect, but it was somewhat unsatisfactory in the military and political aspects.

Well, yes, both economically and culturally speaking, it is relatively enlightened, the economy and the Khitan have ** exchanges, and there are many famous people in culture.

Because at this time, foreign cultures were able to get a certain amount of exchange with local cultures, which rarely happened except after the Tang Dynasty, so it is ......

The most enlightened is, actually. Tang Dynasty. If you really want to talk about Song. It was only in the early Northern Song Dynasty. Not later. Understand?

In the Song Dynasty, the wealth was hidden in the people, and it was heard that the people who sold things put the things they were selling in the same place, drew a circle (in order to remember the location), put them for a day, no one would take them, let alone steal them, and the next day, the people who sold things returned to their original positions and continued to sell!!

The Great Song Dynasty is quite strong culturally and economically anyway, but it can't be diplomatic and military.

...The Tang Dynasty inherited the Sui Dynasty. It's not as good as Song.

1. From the perspective of fiscal revenue, the income of the Song Dynasty Tianfu only accounts for less than 40% of the total income, and the main income is the foreign trade income and commercial tax of the bend hall, which shows that its business was prosperous and the economy was developed, and the economic structure of the former country was closer to that of the modern commodity economy country. Don't say that the previous Tang Dynasty can't be compared, even the Ming and Qing dynasties after it are difficult to look back.

2. The number of coins circulating in the market in the Song Dynasty was huge, and the coins issued before Zhengde in the Ming Dynasty were less than a quarter of those in the Song Dynasty, indicating that the total economic volume of the Song Dynasty at that time was very large, and commercial activities were more frequent. Even after arriving in Zhengdeok, silver began to be officially allowed to become currency and converted into money. The economic scale of the entire Ming Dynasty was only one-tenth of that of the Northern Song Dynasty and one-sixth of that of the Southern Song Dynasty.

I think this is very good, although it is not easy to talk about the data, which oak can say that there is no difference.

Ai Yuejin's explanation of the prosperous era: there is no strong country around, and there are no hostile countries around. Then the Song Dynasty is indeed not a prosperous age. This is determined by historical evolution, not the fault of the Song Dynasty.

First, the surrounding powerful states such as Liao and Western Xia had been produced before the Song Dynasty, and they were almost "waiting" for the Song there;

Second, the contradictions and struggles within the Han nationality, especially the contradictions between the monarch and the generals leading the troops, could not be effectively resolved;

Thirdly, and most importantly, the annexation of land by the landlord class within the Song Dynasty had reached a very bad level, and even Wang Anshi's reform could not solve it. So that the Song did not have a stable rear.

In addition, the Song Dynasty, whether it was the Northern Song Dynasty or the Southern Song Dynasty, lacked enterprising monarchs and commanders with both ability and political integrity, and lacked people who were good at top-level planners. The combination of Song Gaozong and Yue Fei was only a flash in the pan.