The uncle died of a heart attack after stealing the dog, is it reasonable for the family to claim co

Irrationality. Because the uncle stole the dog first, the victim participated in the mediation of the police later, and the victim did not have excessive words and deeds towards the uncle, which was an unreasonable request of the deceased's family.

Unreasonable, stealing is an illegal act, and the death of a heart attack caused by stealing has nothing to do with the dog owner, on the contrary, the dog owner is the victim and should claim compensation from the uncle's family.

Irrationality. The uncle's own illegal behavior is the root cause of the tragedy.

It's unreasonable, this is the uncle himself who came to steal the dog and then died, it can be said that he died by himself, why should he rely on others.

This is unreasonable, after all, it is the uncle who is at fault first, and he has to pay for stealing someone's dog.

Actually, I personally think this is unreasonable. Because there are also some mistakes in the uncle's approach, this kind of claim is unreasonable.

After mediation by the local people's mediation committee, Uncle Zhang and the owner of the butcher shop respectively gave Mr. Li corresponding compensation and obtained Mr. Li's understanding. This matter should be over according to you, but the next day came the news of Uncle Zhang's death.

Uncle Zhang's family said that they must have been angry by what Mr. Li said during the mediation. The family determined that Master Li had a direct connection with Uncle Zhang's death, so they sued Master Li to the Xiuzhou District Court of Jiaxing City, demanding compensation for funeral expenses, spiritual solace and other losses.

Second, the cause of Uncle Zhang's death belongs to his own personal analysis that in this case, the cause of Uncle Zhang's death is actually himself, this thing should still be a very depressing thing for Uncle Zhang, economic compensation is still a trivial matter, and the most important thing is the reputation problem, after all, he stole the dog and was discovered, so after it is passed out, he will definitely be pointed at by the next door, maybe if the incident of losing the dog happens again in the future, he is likely to become a criminal suspect. Maybe others will run directly to the house to make trouble, but in the handling of this matter, whether it is Mr. Li who lost the dog, or the police who handled the matter, they did not take radical words and deeds against Uncle Zhang, so that Uncle Zhang's anger was stuck in his heart and he could not vent, and he may have been complained by his family, which led to a worse mood and eventually led to death.

3. The reason why the family chooses to claim compensation from the dog owner is considered for a variety of reasons1. For the sake of fame

After all, stealing a dog in the township is still a taboo thing, and it is stealing the dog of the people in the same town, which will make Uncle Zhang's family face very ugly, once something similar happens in the future, others will definitely subconsciously think of this matter, which will definitely have an impact on the reputation of Uncle Zhang's family, in order to avoid this happening, Uncle Zhang's family will make a claim to Mr. Li under the banner of the deceased.

2. For economic reasons

After Uncle Zhang's accident, his family was sent to the hospital for rescue, and after the death of the person, he also handled the funeral, which cost a lot of money, which is not a small amount for people in the township, if he can get financial compensation, maybe he can make up for these expenses, and even have some balances.

Why? Because there have been too many cases like this before?!

The dog sued for a life to win the lawsuit, and the family should go to Lord Yama for compensation.

The uncle stole the dog and died of a heart attack, why did the family want to claim compensation from the dog owner. The dog stole and died, and the family was embarrassed to talk about the claim, and the skin was thick enough!

After the dog was found by the owner, he asked the uncle to compensate for the loss, and the uncle died of a sudden cerebral infarction when he couldn't think about it for a while. The family believed that it was due to the dog's owner's claim that the uncle had a heart attack, so they claimed compensation from the dog's owner.

Maybe the dog thief uncle was found when he stole the dog, and was caught by the family, because the uncle was old and caught by the family, so he would definitely say some unpleasant things, and the uncle may have died of a heart attack because of those angry words, so the uncle's family put the responsibility on the family.

Families choose to claim compensation from their dog owners for a number of reasons, for reputational reasons, and for financial reasons. After all, stealing a dog in the township is still a taboo thing, and it is stealing the dog of the town in the same town, which will make Uncle Zhang's family face very ugly, once something similar happens in the future, others will definitely subconsciously think of this matter, which will definitely have an impact on the reputation of Uncle Zhang's family, in order to avoid this situation, Uncle Zhang's family will claim to Mr. Li under the banner of the deceased.

Because his family thinks that it is because of the dog that the uncle will die of a heart attack, I think this is a bit vexatious, obviously this uncle did bad things, and now it has become someone else's wrong.

After the uncle stole the dog, he was tracked down by the dog owner and asked for compensation for the loss, which may make the uncle feel uncomfortable, and the uncle had already had heart bypass surgery and died of a sudden heart attack.

Anyone who has ever had a pet knows that the meaning of pets to owners is not much different from that of relatives, so in the face of the loss or even death of their pets, the owner can imagine how sad he feels.

Recently, there was such an uncle who died of a heart attack because his dog was stolen. It is understood that at the end of 2019, Li from Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province went to the local police station to report that his dog was missing, and then the relevant departments checked the local ** and learned that the dog was taken away by Zhang in the same town, and then sold to the owner of the local vegetable butcher shop.

Li was heartbroken when he learned of the whole incident, and strongly demanded that Zhang and the butcher shop owner compensate for the relevant losses, and then after mediation by the relevant local departments, Zhang and the butcher shop owner respectively gave corresponding compensation and obtained Li's forgiveness.

However, the day after the incident, the local police and Zhang learned the news of Li's death, and Li's family said:

After he went home, he felt unwell, and later died of a sudden heart attack, which must have been angered by what Zhang said during the mediation.

The family determined that Li's death was directly related to Zhang, so they sued Zhang to the local court to demand compensation for funeral expenses, spiritual solace and other related losses.

It is understood that Li suffered from heart disease and had bypass surgery before his death, and the direct cause of death was also indicated in his death certificate as acute myocardial infarction, and later investigated by the relevant departments and found that the mediation between Li, Zhang and the boss was based on the premise of equality and voluntariness, and at the same time, in the mediation process, neither party showed excessive behavior, so it was determined that it was not enough to prove that there was a direct connection between Li's death and Zhang, nor could it be proved that Zhang had improper words and deeds. Therefore, the court did not support the relevant compensation requested by Li's family.

The dog that has been with him for many years was stolen for this reason, and it was even brought to the table in the end. Not only pet lovers who have kept pets, but even ordinary people find it difficult to accept this news, but the fact has happened, the most important thing is to adjust the mentality in time to avoid causing greater tragedy.

The investigation found that the mediation between the two parties and the boss was based on the premise of equality and voluntariness, and at the same time, during the mediation process, neither party showed any excesses, so it was determined that it was not sufficient to prove that there was a direct connection between the uncle's death and the other party, nor could it prove that the other party had improper words and deeds, so the court did not support the relevant compensation requested by the uncle's family.

The family believed that there was no direct causal relationship between the dog thief and the uncle's heart attack, so the court also rejected the family's claim.

The court ruled that it did not support the payment of compensation to the family of the dog thief, and he wanted to slander people after doing bad things, which is really unreasonable.

Strongly demanded compensation for related losses, and then mediated by the relevant local departments, the owner of the dog begged the uncle's family for forgiveness.