The fire department entered the community to fight the fire and was blocked by the lifting pole, whe

The fire department entered the community to fight the fire and was blocked by the lifting pole, and the people of the property were there at the time, but because the lifting pole was broken, the fire was not timely. This is the responsibility of the property.

The duty officer at the property was not on site. Nowadays, there are many problems in the management of properties.

The people of the property are escaping this fact, and the property in a community has control over the lifting pole, but there was no one sitting in the security room at that time, and the property said that the lifting pole was broken, which is obviously nonsense.

A fire broke out in a community in Pingdingshan, Henan, and the fire department of Pingdingshan City urgently arranged a fire truck to extinguish the fire in the community, but it was blocked by a lifting bar at the door of the security booth, and the security booth did not arrange personnel to be on duty. In order to deal with the fire urgently, the firefighters had no choice but to remove the lifting barrier and pass through the occupied fire escape before entering the community and successfully controlling the fire. The fire escape is a life channel, no matter at any time can not be occupied, since the property has set up a security booth here, but does not arrange security personnel on duty, as a property in the community, this is how inaction.

In this incident, the property's inaction was manifested in the following aspects:

One. The property has set up a security booth and has not arranged security personnel to be on duty. The security booth is set up to facilitate the management of the community and better serve the owners, so in order to reflect the original intention of the property service owners, security personnel should be arranged here to be on duty, and it is also convenient to respond and contact in case of emergencies.

However, although a security booth was set up in the community where the incident occurred, there was no one there, how to reflect the purpose of serving the owners. This time, the fire truck rushed to fight the fire, but it could not enter the community due to the lifting bar, which not only could not serve the owners, but would cause greater harm.

Two. Occupy fire escapes. The fire escape is a life passage that no one can occupy at any time, which is also written into the Fire Protection Law.

But from this incident, we can see that the security booth set up by the property is not only unoccupied, but also the fire escape of the community is also occupied, and the property of the community should be held responsible for this.

Three. No fire inspections were scheduled. From this incident, we can also see that the property should not have done any fire inspection work for the community, and it can be seen from the details that the management of the property should be relatively chaotic, and such a work attitude must not serve the owner.

Fortunately, the firefighters made a quick decision and dismantled the lifting barrier in time to control the fire in time. The property in the community should learn a lesson from this incident, actively carry out rectification, and truly implement the service to the owners.

Education is not in place. The property should ensure the safety of the owner and maintain the normal operation of the community, which may be caused by the inaction of the property due to the lack of education.

Because they have lost the original intention of service, and the nature of the property has begun to be deviated, this property will definitely be banned, fire trucks cannot pass, then the owners may be even more pitiful, and this property must be held accountable.

There was no mann on duty at the property, and the electronic lift bar was also out of order. Although a security booth has been set up in the community, there are no security personnel on duty, and the fire escape of the community is also occupied, and the property personnel have a bad working attitude and lack of fire awareness.

Because the property does not pay much attention to fire protection, they do not arrange staff on duty.

The fire department entered the community to fight the fire and was blocked by the lifting pole, in fact, if it was just blocked by the lifting pole, then it was just saidLiability of the propertyBecause there was no one at the property at the time, and the lifting pole was broken and could not be lifted, there was no way to let the car in, so it was the responsibility of the property. Then after entering, the time will be extended, in fact, it is the responsibility of the owner, because there are a lot of cars parked there, so the car driven by the firefighters is not able to enter, and the short distance takes a long time, so if there is no emergency passage or can not let people pass, it will delay the time to fight the fire. So this also gives us a warning, if there is any damage to the community, then the property must be replaced in time.

And in the case of the property, there is also damage to the lifting pole, then it must be a problem with the property, if the property can be detected earlier, it will not be so difficult for firefighters, or it will be used for so long, if the fire is really because of the problem of the lifting pole that has led to greater loss of life or property, then it must be a matter of the property.

Although this incident has passed, there are still a lot of warnings for us, because when fighting fires, every time is equivalent to the time of our lives and property, so if there is any place that prevents our firefighters from entering, or increases the time of rescue, then we must bear the corresponding responsibility.

After such a thing happens, we must feel that such a thing will not happen again in the future, maybe we just feel that it will not happen again, but such things are often very common in our lives, because most properties may not realize how bad such a situation is if it is dangerous, just like now firefighters are blocked by the lifting pole and cannot enter, then this responsibility must be becauseProblems with the property

The responsibility of the property in the community, the daily lack of maintenance of the lifting pole, led to the failure of the critical moment, so that the fire truck could not reach the fire scene in time.

The responsibility of the property, the failure of the property to respond to the emergency in the event of an accident.

It must be the responsibility of the property, indicating that the fire protection work of the property is not in place at all, and the lifting pole is not checked and repaired in time, which will lead to the fire truck being stopped, which must be the responsibility of the property.

I think it is the responsibility of the property in the community, and the fire escape should not have a lifting pole, which directly affects and delays the fire extinguishing time.

This seems to be the responsibility of the community security guard, but what the security guard does is not let others in, he doesn't know so much, he is simply afraid of being deducted from his salary, if he really has to say whose responsibility is, it can only be the property.

Because there were no security guards at the time, the property was not aware of such a situation.

The property was not allowed to enter the fire truck because of the need to consult the management personnel, but the firefighters dismantled the access with their bare hands.

Because at this time, the property needs to be formalized, and at the same time, the property does not have a key, so it can be said that such a regulation is very unreasonable.

It's not that the property doesn't let you in, it's that the people from the property didn't come at all, and then there has been no way to get in, thanks to the firefighters who decisively demolished it, otherwise the consequences would be unimaginable.

This is because no one opened the door in this access control place, so after seeing this situation, they started to dismantle this access control.

Because there is no security guard on duty at the entrance of the community, the door cannot be opened, which is of course a dereliction of duty on the part of the property.

I remember it seemed that the property couldn't find the key at the time, so there was no way to get in.