Is the house worth or the land after the countryside?

Land is a little more valuable because it has the largest area and the largest utilization rate, while the house is gone as soon as it is demolished, leaving only land, so it is a little more valuable.

I think land is more valuable, housing is just a value-added construction of land, land is a non-renewable resource, with the development of the economy, land resources are getting less and less, and land will become more and more expensive.

I think land will be more valuable because it can grow the food that people need in their daily lives, and it can play a greater value.

Of course, the land is worth a lot.

Rural land is becoming more and more valuable, mainly because more and more urban people will go to the countryside to buy land. In order to be able to build a house on the land, but it was planned before 2020, and the land is all owned by the state, not by individuals. If it is illegal to buy or sell land in rural areas, there is clear land in rural areas where it can be cultivated.

However, if you want to build a house in your hometown, you must get the approval of the village committee, and you can only build a house if it is approved.

Now more and more rural people will vigorously develop in the city, but for the city people, they are tired of life in the city. So they will consider living in the countryside to attract more wealthy people to root in the countryside to feel the fresh air in the countryside. I also want to slowly relax the stress of my life.

The living pressure of urban people will be much greater than that of rural people, because rural people stay in their own acres and thirds of land all day long, have less contact with people, and can eat and drink.

If rural people have their own homestead in their hometown and have a real estate certificate, they can consider selling all the houses in their hometown and countryside. I can feel that the house in the countryside in my hometown was very worthless, but now a house is nearly 60 to 700,000 yuan, which is about the same as the house price in the city. Nowadays, all villages are vigorously promoting some rural transportation convenience programs, even if you live in remote villages, those who want to go to the city have become concrete roads.

Moreover, every household in the countryside has a car, and it is very convenient to drive to the city.

In the past, people felt that rural transportation was inconvenient, especially if they wanted to go shopping, they had to take the bus. It is a long way to take the bus, which will also make it inconvenient for rural people. But now, some buses also go directly to each villager's home.

Because transportation is more convenient, rural people will be more willing to stay in the countryside.

In the countryside, whether the house is worth or the land is worth is because, if you use your existing house value, compared with the rural collective land, there is no comparison, the house value is very small, the land value is unlimited, that is, with your own house, the value of the house is very small compared to the few acres of land you have the right to contract, and the value of a few acres of land is unlimited.

With the development of society and technology, land provides valuable resources for human survival. The linkage between scientific and technological development and urban and rural development has led to the transformation of agricultural production methods. On the basis of the land circulation model in the plain area, large-scale agricultural management entities such as agricultural subsidence, agricultural society, and household subsidence have been constructed, and the scale and intensification of land management have been realized.

Modern production. It has increased grain production, reduced input costs, and improved economic efficiency. Farmers and peasants increased their incomes, so houses and land were not comparable.

There are two possibilities for a house on a homestead compared to an appraised homestead.

If your existing homes and homesteads are in or around the city, it is a massive urban sprawl area. Your house and homestead will be expropriated by the state and village collectives by mutual agreement. The house compensation is owned by you, and the homestead is owned by the village committee.

This creates a large subsidy, which belongs to the village council. However, considering the practical problems, the village committee will give some owners (the amount is higher than the house price), and the land value (homestead) is higher than the house value.

If your house is built in a remote mountainous area, where there are mountains, mountains, and slopes, it is not suitable for large-scale agricultural machinery operations, and it is difficult to carry out land circulation and development. For now, it can only maintain the status quo. Farming with small farm machinery saved the land from famine.

In this special environment, your house is very valuable, and the homestead is not worth much, because there is no land here anymore, and there is value for development.

The main value of the countryside is land.

The longer a house is built, the lower its value; But land may be worth more and more. At present, many of the state's policies are tilting toward the rural areas, and the rural development will get better and better in the future, especially the rural land in the suburbs of the city will become more and more valuable.

In the future, land will definitely be more valuable, because there is less and less land now.

It should still be the value of the land, because the land will be used for many purposes in the future.

I think the land is worth a lot, after all, a homestead is also very valuable now.

Personally, I feel that land is more valuable, because houses are built on the basis of land.

In the future, the houses and land in the countryside will be very much before, but the land is still more valuable.

I think that if you are in the countryside in the future, it may be that the land is worth a lot. The house is not worth much.

It must be the land, the ownership of the house is fifty years, but the land can always be.

It should be that the land is more valuable, and sooner or later the house will be uninhabitable, but the land has always been.

I think it's still land, after all, this land is very important.

This thing must be the most valuable thing in land, as long as you have land, you can do anything.

First: the composition of housing property rights by real estate and real estate, also known as real estate, because the rural housing land by the collective and local ** approval, the homestead does not need to pay the land transfer fee, equivalent to zero cost, the land price is not as valuable as urban construction land, so the house also reduces the cost of a large piece of land.

Second: Most of the houses built in rural areas are self-built, and their construction costs and labor costs are very cheap, and they are cheaper than those in cities in terms of cost, so they are naturally worthless.

Third: rural transportation facilities, education facilities, medical facilities are not as good as urban population concentration areas, in addition to agricultural planting, there is no other industry to drive the economy, can not attract foreign population, the original population is self-sufficient, from the marketing point of view, ** and demand is equal or ** greater than demand, naturally there is no marketing market.

Fourth, the land in rural areas is collectively owned and cannot be traded on the market, but can only be traded between the same villages, and a family can only own one homestead, which is also the basic reason why rural houses are not valuable.

Roads, water supply and drainage, education, medical care and other supporting facilities cannot keep up, another reason is that rural houses are built on homesteads, and homesteads cannot be circulated and traded.

The two are used for different purposes, and the copy has its own benefits, and it is impossible to compare which one is more valuable

1. If the parties have a demand for housing and meet the requirements of one household and one house, then the dao is more valuable for the homestead;

2. If there is already a homestead in the countryside, then the cultivated land must also be matched, and the area is larger, which is more suitable for the parties;

3. Homesteads can be reclaimed, but cultivated land cannot be used for non-agricultural construction (building houses) under normal circumstances, but can be rented to a third party for income;

4. To sum up, in the eyes of different people, there will be different results, and it is enough to make a suitable choice based on their own reality.