Now that the peasants eat and drink without worrying , are the peasants richer or poorer?

It is true that the peasants have become richer, but the gap between the rich and the poor between the peasants and the urban population has also widened.

With the continuous development of society, we can find that many farmers basically do not have to worry about food and drink, and at the same time, they do not need to worry about their own survival. To some extent, we have basically lifted many people out of basic poverty, and most people have also entered a well-off life. For the peasant group, people's lives are also constantly improving with the development of society.

First, the peasants have indeed become richer.

This is a very real problem, we can think back to what was 30 years ago, or compare the scene 30 years ago with the present, and we will find that many farmers are indeed better off than before. When we entered a moderately prosperous society in an all-round way, we found that the rural areas have taken on a new look, and the peasant groups basically do not need to worry about their basic survival problems, and many people even have a better quality of life. <>

Second, the gap between the rich and the poor between the peasants and the urban population has also become wider.

The reason why some people think that the peasants have become poorer than before is not because the peasants have no money to eat and drink, but because the gap between the rich and the poor between the peasants and the urban population has widened. The main reason for this situation is that many peasants will choose to work in the cities, which will further accelerate the construction of the cities, and at the same time, it will also lead to the lag of the construction of the rural areas. In this context, opportunities are generally not as great in rural areas as in cities, and urban populations become more affluent.

Third, the gap between the rich and the poor between the rural and urban populations will be further narrowed.

When the city reaches a certain level of saturation, many urban people will choose to gradually return to the countryside, and some people will also choose to realize their personal value in the countryside. When more and more people return to the countryside, the phenomenon of reverse urbanization will further narrow the gap between the rich and the poor between the rural and urban populations, and more employment opportunities will be provided in rural areas. <>

Farmers are now rich, because vegetables are very expensive now, which can make farmers make a lot of money, and now farmers live very happily every day, their economic level has been constantly improving, and the living conditions are getting better and better.

I think farmers should be richer because they can be self-sufficient in their daily lives, they don't have to buy fruit, they can spend less on their families, and they can save money to do more things.

Rich. Nowadays, farmers are gradually beginning to live a well-off life, and some of the national agricultural support policies, as well as medical insurance policies, can benefit farmers, so now the lives of farmers are beginning to get better and better.

Personally, I think that the fundamental reason why peasants are poor is that they don't know how to be flexible or how to invest, and they only know how to do certain things in accordance with the rules. Most farmers make money by cultivating land, but they only know how to make money by growing some crops on the cultivated land, but they do not know how to grow some crops with commercial value.

The peasants' educational qualifications are not particularly high, it is difficult to find suitable jobs, and the money earned from farming is very small, which leads to the peasants being particularly poor. Most farmers will choose to go out to work, and will do some odd jobs to earn money.

The peasants' thinking is relatively progressive, and they are not willing to innovate, so they will be poorer, and most peasants are guarding their own land to make money.

Summary. First, the agricultural grain is too low, and the peasants have no bargaining power over agricultural products. As we all know, no matter what we sell (except for food crops), it is priced by the seller, and this is also determined by the average level of the industry, so whether it is processing or products, there is a certain profit.

But farmers do not have any bargaining power over the food they produce, let alone the right to set prices, and can only passively accept a very low market**.

Everything comes out of the ground, but why are the poorest people the peasants?

First, the agricultural grain is too low, and the peasants have no bargaining power over agricultural products. As we all know, no matter what we sell (except for food crops), it is priced by the seller, and this is also determined by the average level of the industry, so whether it is processing or products, there is a certain profit. But farmers do not have any bargaining power over the food they produce, let alone the right to set prices, and can only passively accept a very low market**.

As early as around 2006, China's grain prices have reached more than one dollar a catty, at that time, whether it is labor, agricultural materials or other aspects of the cost is very low, so a dollar or a pound of grain prices for farmers is not bad. However, to this day, the price of grain is still only about five pounds a piece, which means that over the years, the price of grain has only risen by a few cents a catty, but the cost of growing grain has increased several times, which makes it impossible for peasants to make money at all from growing grain, and even lose money, so if rural people rely on growing grain to support their families, they will still live very poor. Second, agriculture is risky, and it seems to be very profitable to start a business in the rural areas if you are not careful, but the risks are also relatively large, and the proportion of successful entrepreneurs is not high, so the rural areas seem to be developing very well, but in fact there are still many poor people.

The risks of rural people starting a business come from all sides, but the peasants' ability to prevent risks is relatively poor, and they often "return to the pre-liberation period overnight" if they are not careful, which directly leads to the fact that the peasants dare not start a business, so they cannot make any money.

There is no way to kiss the family, because the peasants do the most tiring work and get the least money.

The real identity of the peasants is multi-occupied, and the larger group is the amphibious, that is, they are called farmers, because their household registration is in the countryside, and the farmland and real estate are in the countryside, and they are also called workers, because they have worked in urban factories for a long time or even decades. To be precise, peasants are bitter or tired. Although it is currently a mechanically automated plough and does not need to plough, other farm work still needs to be done by manpower, and every farm work done by manpower needs to sweat vigorously.

Some people say that the peasants' lives are very good, but this is a fact, and there has been great progress compared with the sixties and seventies, and this is also an inevitable trend of social development.

However, there is still a world of difference in the quality of life of people with high retirement pensions in cities with high retirement pensions in their hands. Life is very good, not a day of delicious food, wear cotton sateen, drive a luxury car and live in a garden house. We have tea and light food every day, clothes are diligent and thrifty, physically and mentally healthy, the spirit is happy, we keep our hearts happy, and we can have such a psychological state, that is, we live a good life.

China's peasants may account for the majority, and many peasants have <> despite achieving the level of moderate prosperity

It is an indisputable fact that there is still a certain difference between people in the city, and life is still relatively hard and tired. At the same time, in addition to the vast area of our country, there are great differences in the natural environment, ecological resources, and natural conditions throughout the country, and there will be some differences in peasant incomes throughout the country, which is inevitable. In addition to planting their own farmland, the vast majority of farmers mainly earn their own income** or work outside to earn their own hard-earned money.

Now that the economy is active, the variety of requirements will increase. If urban people want to build a manufacturing plant, they will have to face high rents, all kinds of expenses, and all kinds of supervision.

Farmers can do it in their own yards, and if they have more goods, they can also accumulate their own responsible fields, and if there is no pollution or anything, they will not offend all kinds of inconveniences. The advantages are numerous. Families who have been working hard in the countryside for a long time may have understood the way to survive, and it may not be easy for newcomers to take away that bowl of rice.

The vast majority of villages still have no industrial chain support, and students rely on themselves for employment. The only trend in the countryside is that it feels like it's clean and hygienic. Great efforts have indeed been made to improve the living environment.

This is because the state's policy toward peasants is relatively good, and secondly, the cost of living in rural areas is relatively low. Now farmers farm land and enjoy state subsidies, and if they have a few acres of land at home, they can receive a certain amount of subsidies every month.

There is no choice for this, rural people are born farmers, they have no skills, and their culture is not particularly high, so there is no way to choose other lives.

This is not an option, some people do not have a stable job, and the farmer is their only protection.