How to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a document

The evaluation of a literature needs to be considered in the following aspects:

2.Academic value: The importance and value of literature in academic research can be evaluated by considering the contribution of literature to the current subject field, theoretical innovation, and practical exploration.

When evaluating a literature, it is necessary to consider the above aspects comprehensively, and at the same time, it is also necessary to conduct specific analysis and evaluation according to one's own research object and research needs. In addition, when evaluating literature, it is also necessary to pay attention to following academic norms and ethical standards, pay attention to the reliability and authority of citations, and maintain academic integrity and respect.

What problem to study and why to study it? 1) See whether the questions raised have research value, whether the research content is instructive, and whether the research results can be applied to practice.

2) Whether the idea is innovative, whether it repeats the work of others, even if it is the same theme, it must be constantly increased.

3) See whether the incidence of the research problem is high and whether the problem is universal.

4) Whether the title is specific, distinct, and precise.

What method to use to study this problem (method).

1) Which or more methods should be used to study the target object?

2) How to arrange the procedures for specific research and other issues also affect the advantages and disadvantages of the first.

How should the approach be implemented? (Take the questionnaire method as an example) Determine the respondent of the questionnaire (for example, if the reading of extracurricular books by middle school students is studied, then the respondent should be middle school students. Send out questionnaires and fill out questionnaires.

Collect the questionnaire and select a valid questionnaire (all questions are answered in the same way, and some questions in the questionnaire are invalid) Collect the questionnaire results and count the questionnaire results.

The results of the research, whether the results can be accurately obtained and interpreted.

Whether the format is standardized, ** has a fixed format.

Whether the information** is true and accurate.

Whether the language is accurate and the logic is clear.

If you want to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of an article, you must have knowledge of yourself in this area to evaluate, and you can't evaluate it if you don't have a certain appreciation.

1.The topic is relatively novel and the perspective is relatively unique, which reflects the solid foundation of a certain theory, especially the article can be combined with relevant cases for argumentation and analysis, which has certain practical value.

2. The research content is realistic and operable. The topic is selected as a hot social issue, and the logical structure is rigorous. The views are clearly expressed and the arguments are comprehensive. The language is plain and concise, and easy to understand.

The topic selection is more contemporary and realistic. The structure of the full text is reasonable. The expression of opinions is basically accurate.

Evaluate the literature from the following aspects:

It is required to accurately and truthfully express the arguments and experimental results of the authors of the literature. The text is smooth, concise, readable and practical. Whether there are new insights and perspectives that are instructive or inspiring. Do you have your own research results?

Generally, the aspects that can be evaluated include: whether the idea is novel, whether the structure is complete, whether the hierarchy is clear, whether the language expression is accurate, whether the point of view is reasonable, whether the conclusion is correct, etc.

We need to evaluate the overall structure and content of **.

In this way, we can better evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of a **.

Evaluations need to be more comprehensive and objective.

The pros and cons of the evaluation** are as follows:

After the review of **, it can be seen that the author has spent a lot of effort on the collection of data and cases, and can also put forward some more profound views, but there are still certain deficiencies in the depth of the theory and the citation of some arguments. Overall, this is a passable article.

2. The research content is realistic and operable. The topic is selected as a hot social issue, and the logical structure is rigorous. The views are clearly expressed and the arguments are comprehensive.

The language is plain and concise, and easy to understand. In the process of argumentation, it can also better combine the principles of professional knowledge with practical problems. But the arguments are not enough.

Generally meet the graduation requirements**.

3. The topic selection is more contemporary and realistic. The structure of the full text is reasonable. The expression of opinions is basically accurate.

The content of the full text is written in close connection with the requirements of the administrative management profession, which fully reflects the characteristics of the administrative management profession. There is a lot of relevant information to consult. But the main disadvantage is that there are not many things that belong to their own innovation.

Generally meet the graduation requirements**.

4. In the entire graduation project, the student can successfully complete the writing under the strict requirements of the teacher. The structure is complete, and each part basically meets the writing specifications. In order to write this ** author, he obviously consulted a lot of information, and the discussion was relatively sufficient, and the organization was also very clear.

Of course, there are some deficiencies and areas that need to be improved. For example, the knowledge is not broad enough to actively communicate with the teacher about the progress of the work. It is hoped that the student will pay attention to these issues in his future work or study and strive for greater improvement and progress.

5. The content of ** question is basically consistent with **, the structure is basically complete, the language is relatively smooth, and there are no major grammatical errors. The problem is that there are too many parts quoted in the full text, too little analysis of one's own, and some "analysis" has traces of plagiarism. It should be said that the materials required to complete this article are already available, and the author can analyze and summarize the materials on this basis to draw his own conclusions.

A good ** should first be able to solve an unsolved problem, the topic should be novel, and it should be supported by data.

Content, Topic, References, Word Count, Data and Facts Support, Format, Ideas and Logic, Novelty, Whether or Not a Problem Solves.