How to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of leading cadres

EvaluationLeading cadresThe advantages and disadvantages are as follows:

1. The leadership has clear ideas, responsibilities to people, deployment in place, and strong ability to control the overall situation.

2. The leadership has high personal quality, rational thinking and work ability, and sets an example for everyone to learn.

3. The leader is easy-going, unites colleagues, cares about comrades, can fully mobilize everyone's enthusiasm, and has a strong affinity.

4. Under the leadership of the leaders, everyone performed their duties, cooperated with each other, gave full play to the joint force, and reflected strong combat effectiveness.

5. Leaders often eat and live at the grassroots level, forgetting selfishness, and their families have made great sacrifices.

6. The shortcomings of leadership are everywhere, and the platform for leadership work is too narrow, which is difficult to reflect its talents.

First, the overall situation. It is also called the system view, the holistic view, and the vernacular is called the general knowledge. Be able to think about the problem as a whole, rather than looking at a specific part or a specific time period.

Second, forward-looking and predictable. As the saying goes, if people have no long-term concerns, they must have near-term worries. If leaders are not forward-looking and foreseeable, then the work can only focus on the present and the present, and they will be exhausted.

As the saying goes, if a soldier bears, there will be a nest of bears. When encountering a leader who lacks foresight and foresight, his subordinates will be very angry.

Third, the ability to plan and plan, the way of thinking, organization and logic of doing things. I met a leader with a very clear mind: the core equipment was broken, the production was out of touch, and a large number of orders could not be delivered.

A piece of equipment was ordered, but the production capacity was cut in half. I really don't know what this kind of leader thinks, it's obviously a confusion of thinking!

Fourth, insight. There are many rights and wrongs in front of leaders, especially some villains, who like to fiddle with right and wrong in front of leaders. As a leader, you must know how to identify, and don't be fooled and used by villains.

Fifth, organizational and leadership skills. Some leaders seem to have good relationships and connections, but this does not equate to organizational and leadership skills.

Sixth, personal charisma.

Advantages: clear leadership thinking, responsibilities to people, deployment in place, strong ability to control the overall situation.

Advantages: Leaders often eat and live at the grassroots level, forget about selfishness, and their families have made great sacrifices.

Strengths: helpful, good at unity, hard-working, approachable. Disadvantages: The work style is too restrained and not bold enough.

Strengths: kind-hearted, honest, single-minded, shrewd and capable, stable personality, proactive. Disadvantages: Usually pay too much attention to details, and it is possible to neglect the grasp of the whole.

Strengths: Caring for others, self-motivated, able to work independently, good interpersonal skills, willing to work under pressure, and leadership qualities. Disadvantages: Lack of experience in dealing with people.

Advantages: perseverance, perseverance, and their own opinions. Disadvantages: Theoretical learning needs to be further deepened.

Advantages: There is your own way to learn, learning new things is efficient, and learning new skills is quick. Disadvantages: Less work experience and further training is needed.

The advantages and disadvantages of evaluating individual leaders are as follows; 1. Advantages: clear leadership ideas, responsibilities to people, deployment in place, strong ability to control the overall situation.

5. Disadvantages: do not pay attention to the body. Leaders are so engrossed in their work that they often forget to sleep and eat, do not pay attention to rest, and do not pay attention to the combination of work and rest. The body is the capital of the revolution, and if it goes on like this for a long time, it will exhaust the body and be a loss to the unit.

6. Disadvantages: The leader smokes and drinks, and hopes that the leader can pay attention to his health. Smoking is harmful to health, drinking too much alcohol is not good for health, if you have to socialize for the benefit of the company, you should also pay attention to take care, otherwise you will drag the sick body to insist on leading everyone, and everyone can't bear it.

7. Disadvantages: lack of courage in work. Leaders are too cautious in decision-making, especially when making decisions on major issues, they always repeatedly investigate and demonstrate, and solicit opinions from many parties, in order to be foolproof, and lack of saying no.

Second, the courage and courage to fight quickly.

No one is perfect, whether it is a leader, a colleague, including your own relatives, a good criticism of you, can not completely show that you have done wrong, sometimes their understanding and your understanding is deviated, so it can not be said that what they know is correct, but we should still maintain as much respect and understanding as possible for this criticism of the leader, if there is something wrong, we must explain to the leader, correct the leader's mistakes.

Everyone has shortcomings, leaders are also people, and of course there are many shortcomings. However, for the leader, try to highlight its points, and know its shortcomings, and there is no need to make a special evaluation. Perhaps an objective and realistic assessment will bring you unexpected disaster.

This is the reality of Chinese society.

The deficiencies of leadership should not be pointed at the key points, otherwise it is easy to offend people.

First of all, we should pay attention to how the leader usually evaluates himself, for example, how I am a person, which is the biggest problem. That's one of them, because the leaders themselves say so about themselves.

Secondly, it is, what everyone says, and then it is recognized by the leadership. In this way, the evaluator must not offend anyone, because it is just a summary of everyone's opinions.

In the end, it depends on how the evaluator shows the characteristics of this evaluation to evaluate the leader. The key here is to describe the leader's perceived strengths as faults. For example, he always works overtime every day and comes home late.

Then we can say that this is a lack of leadership, and we say that we have a poor sense of time and do not pay attention to rest. On the surface, it is insufficient, but in fact, it is praise in the eyes of outsiders or superior leaders.

Only a fool will evaluate the shortcomings of the leader, even if the leader is a camel poop, it is also the feces with the highest fertility!

It's better not to, it's too unlucky.