Seek help from a professional lawyer, is my dad responsible for this? 10

Updated on society 2024-07-24
16 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    Of course, there is no responsibility! It's not the consequences caused by Dad, why should I ask you for compensation. Didn't the woman check that it was fine, and if there was no evidence to explain, she could only be responsible for herself.

    It's really bad luck to meet this kind of neighbor, and there is no one in ten thousand ......

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    It doesn't matter if you don't do it, and even if you do it, it's justified defense, because you can get a certificate from the hospital to prove that she's fine, so you don't exceed the necessary limit.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Leave it at that, unless she can prove that your dad actually hit her and caused her to be hospitalized.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    It's okay, just go about your own business and don't worry.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    There are several legal conditions that must be met for tort liability. In terms of the facts of your case, if you analyze it according to the tort liability, 100% of your behavior is a cause of his damage, and the person who collided with you and you are a joint tortfeasor, obviously he did not collide with you, so you will not collide with him. These two acts of damage occur simultaneously, without interruption, and are direct.

    Then from the point of view of playing ball, the sport itself is dangerous (there are very few sports that do not have injuries), so everyone who participates in the sport should know or be able to foresee the risk of damage that the sport itself will bring. Injuries sustained during a match conducted in accordance with the rules should be an accident and the victim should bear the relevant losses. Unless it can be proved that the damage was intentionally caused by the perpetrator, i.e. you deliberately broke his teeth.

    If the damage caused in the sport is compensated by the wrongdoer, then the Olympic Committee, FIFA, and F1 traffic jams can be dissolved. No one has to participate in the competition anymore. Because 90% (presumably) of the damage they do in the confrontation class is caused by the opponent, and a very small number of it is caused by their own physical reasons.

    You only need to bear the corresponding supplementary liability, and the proportion should be negotiated by both parties or determined by the court.

    Note that it is not tort liability, tort liability can claim compensation for personal injury, and the amount of compensation can be more than the actual loss.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    If he is allowed to sue......

    If you can prove that someone else was hit and caused the injury, you can be sure that you are not liable.

    If it cannot be proved, then at most it is necessary to bear the necessary medical expenses, remember to emphasize that it is caused by the fault of a third party, and avoid asking for moral damages as much as possible.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Oh, if you are injured while playing basketball, you only need to pay the liability for compensation, and you don't need to pay the responsibility for punishment, rest assured, the worst case is the cost of accompanying medical expenses and lost work.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    1.If there are witnesses, preferably referees, who can prove that your actions were not fouled or that there was a normal collision on the basketball, then you are not liable. Because there is a relative duty of tolerance in the arena, the other party will not be required to pay legal responsibility for reasonable physical contact, except for malicious fouls, of course.

    2.If you can't prove the above circumstances, it is not right for the other party to demand compensation from you for all the losses. Because in the field of civil tort, such an act is a general tort, and if there is a fault, compensation will be paid, and if there is no fault, no compensation will be paid.

    There is no need to analyze your fault, but I can remind you of his fault, if he does his own reasonable duty of prevention, will his teeth be broken if he wears braces, and if he can't play in the NBA, at least he has seen the NBA, and he has not learned to play ball with other people.

    It is recommended that you ignore his unreasonable demands and wait for him to sue you before giving it. If he sues you, according to the rules of the Civil Procedure Law, he has to prove that you are at fault, and if he can't prove it, he doesn't have to pay for it, but in view of his own fault, even if he pays about half, he will only pay about half. And there is a basis for compensation, how much the actual loss is, just ask him to take the invoice and calculate the compensation.

    Hope it helps!

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Hello, I work in the judicial department, for this situation, I will say that first of all, 20,000 yuan is pure nonsense, any type of compensation, his specific amount is to be subdivided, that is to say, each account must have legal identification and basis.

    If you really go through the judicial process, then this is a civil dispute, and there is no winner or loser, that is, the court is based on civil mediation, then according to my experience, you will definitely have to pay for the medical expenses of 2500, and according to his occupation, whether the injury of the front teeth will affect his normal work, causing him to have to go home to recuperate, unless it is very special, the damage to the front teeth will not affect the normal work, so the loss of time can basically not be considered. In addition, as for what mental damage fee, it is even more nonsense, this is a joke blurted out by people who do not understand the law, mental loss is subject to strict judicial appraisal, through judicial psychiatric appraisal to determine whether an accident caused mental damage to the party, caused psychological disorders or other injuries, that person was playing basketball and knocked out 2 front teeth and mental damage is completely incompatible. In addition, after all, people have been hurt a little, so court mediation will generally ask you to pay some more expenses to show comfort, which is about 500 yuan.

    Hence the conclusion:

    The worst result (the nature of the person's work is related to teeth or image, public relations): 2500 medical expenses + 1500 lost work expenses + 500 consolation expenses = 4500 yuan.

    Best result: 2,500 medical expenses + 500 consolation expenses = 3,000 yuan.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    One thing to be clear is, did you suffer any external force when you fell backwards? Who made it? If someone drags you backwards, causing your body part to accidentally touch another person, then you are not responsible for the person's injury, and the responsibility lies with the dragger; If you cause injury to another person due to your own reasons, then you need to pay at least medical expenses and other expenses, and if the injured person needs to be hospitalized, you may also pay for nursing expenses, lost work expenses and other expenses.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Hello, you can let him sue to go.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    1. First of all, the Food and Drug Administration is to perform its duties;

    2. There is a causal relationship between the performance of duties and the death of your father;

    3. The Food and Drug Administration shall be liable for compensation for the personal injury caused by its staff in the performance of their duties.

  13. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    In accordance with the provisions, Article 2 of the "Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Law in the Trial of Criminal Cases Involving Traffic Accidents" provides that a person who causes a traffic accident in any of the following circumstances shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or short-term detention: (1) one person dies or three or more persons are seriously injured, and bears full or primary responsibility for the accident; , but as far as you say, the point is what is the cause of death? Personally, I believe that only civil liability should be borne in this case.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    The key is to provide evidence, and if it is a legitimate defense, it can be exempted from liability in accordance with the law.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    First of all, let's take a look at this case, negligence causing death is a criminal case, a public prosecution case, and the police station actually suppressed it and did not transfer it to the procuratorate, so that the parties on both sides could conduct civil mediation in private. I asked the police station to not even file a case.

    Of course, if this matter goes to court, the court will find out that your uncle did not cause the death by negligence, and you will be held criminally responsible. Now that I have been in private, I have been relieved of this worry, but I have lost a bit too much.

    Then, the forklift driver is an employee of the excavator boss, and the forklift has also been rented to the excavator boss, and the boss should bear the main responsibility for the safety accident, but now your father bears the main responsibility for compensation, which is a bit wronged.

    Finally, I want to say, your dad was wrong, very wrong! How can you sign it yourself? Although the law does not protect usury (as long as the interest rate exceeds 4 times that of similar bank loans), if people go to court, your father will also have to lose the principal.

    In the case of usury, they did not sign an agreement to borrow money, so they have no responsibility to repay. But in the case of death, your dad bears secondary liability for compensation, and the excavator boss bears the primary responsibility, so you can ask your dad to go to the excavator boss and say that if they don't repay the loan together, they will sue Mu Huasun to the court, and it is estimated that he will be afraid. Of course, this idea is risky, if you really go to court, this previous fatal case will definitely be pulled out, and your uncle may have to be sentenced.

    In a word, your dad has been wronged.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    1. The traffic police can only seize the vehicle for identification reasons, otherwise the vehicle should be released. But the court can detain the car.

    2.Your father can go to the court to look at the file and see if the complaint and summons have been served in accordance with the law.

    3. If the judgment has taken effect. If you want to overturn the case, it is extremely difficult.

    Finally, for the sake of prudence, it is recommended that you bring the relevant materials to the local law firm for detailed consultation!

    Praise is the driving force for the continuation of the trembling faction, if you like my feelings, you can evaluate it in the lower and buried side.

Related questions
24 answers2024-07-24

The proof of property right is the property right registration certificate, but if it involves the sale and purchase of a house, it is necessary to go to the property right registration department for property right registration, and if the property right certificate is inconsistent with the registration book of the registration department, if it cannot be proved that the registration is indeed wrong, the registration book of the property right registration department shall prevail. >>>More

9 answers2024-07-24

You have to find acquaintances to do it, use some brains to think of a way, and be social.

22 answers2024-07-24

Then change the cause of action according to what the court said, the practice of courts in different places is different, you just submit the relevant supporting materials, that is, change the cause of action, it doesn't matter.

7 answers2024-07-24

You file a lawsuit for divorce, spend all your savings on your hard-won marriage, repay the borrowed money, collect evidence, and ask the defendant to return the bride price, she likes other men, do you have evidence! For example, photographs, cameras, etc., the plaintiff must be present at the court, and the defendant can entrust his parents to be at the scene.

17 answers2024-07-24

You are legally responsible for the child, but not for your girlfriend. There is a legal obligation to support the child.