In order to avoid being eaten, will organisms evolve to become more and more unpalatable?

No matter what the animal becomes, humans will find a way to eat it, so there is no need for these creatures to make themselves difficult to eat for the sake of human predators, because they can't escape.

No, because the main food of human beings is artificially raised, and human beings can raise their favorite foods through genetic modification, so it is not necessary for organisms to evolve to be unpalatable, and people do not eat them much.

No. Because the direction of biological evolution is controlled by the environment, it does not evolve to become more and more unpalatable in order to avoid being eaten.

I guess many people nowadays think that they decide what they like to eat, and if you think so, then this article must be something you can't miss. Before interpreting this sentence, we must truly recognize one point of view: one side of the water and soil supports the other side.

What does this mean? This means that our eating habits are largely determined by where we were born, rather than by what we are free to choose. Of course, some acquired eating habits or changes in the living environment will also cause us to form new eating habits, but in essence, what we like to eat is the result of conditional selection, not the result of free choice.

To name an experience that most people have experienced deeply:

For example, if you are asked to eat big fish and meat for a few days in a row, you may like to eat it at first; However, after eating for a while, you will feel that the greens are better than these delicacies from the mountains and seas, right? In the same way, if a person eats vegetarian for a long time, then when eating meat, he will also feel that meat is better than vegetarian.

So, the question is, let's remove the difference in the production process, is the meat delicious or vegetarian? Therefore, you will find that for predators, there is no difference between good or bad taste, but whether you can eat it, whether you can eat it or not, and whether you can eat it or not. And, from a practical point of view, except for some fruits and vegetables that do not need to be reprocessed and eaten, for most foods, it is difficult to eat raw.

However, for the ingenious human, it doesn't matter if you are unpalatable, I have skimmed all kinds of things that are difficult to eat alone, heated them, fried them, and it is another delicious plate. Raw pork is unpalatable, right? Fennel, star anise, and tangerine peel alone let you eat them, and you can't eat them, right?

However, with a little operation, return to the pot meat, and the braised pork will come out. So you say, if you put yourself in the shoes of these materials, you have evolved to be unpalatable enough, but have you escaped the mouth of the predator?

Therefore, living beings do not evolve in this way, because by their very nature, they do not know whether their taste will be liked by the eater.

Of course, biological evolution is now what most people think: "survival of the fittest, survival of the fittest", but, in essence, biological evolution is more premised on randomness, that is, biological stability and mutation. Stability is to keep the species alive, while randomness is the evolution that guarantees the uncertainty of the species, some of which are more adaptable to the environment, some of which are not, and nothing more.

Yes. This is because organisms will evolve to get smarter and smarter, and their IQ will get higher and higher, so it will lead to more and more unpalatable.

Yes, this will keep you safe and good for the continuation of the species.

Possibly, because many organisms want to protect themselves better, they may evolve to be very unpalatable, so that they can protect themselves.

Because the evolution of animals is controlled by the environment, other factors do not cause the evolution of animals, so animals do not evolve to be unpalatable in order to avoid being eaten by other animals.

Animals can't evolve this kind of intelligence, they can only evolve hiding skills and escape skills, if they are so smart, it is estimated that the food chain of the animal kingdom will be changed.

Because animals are flesh and blood, they have no ability, and they can't violate the laws of nature, and they can make themselves unpalatable if they want to be unpalatable, which feels a bit unscientific.

In order to avoid being eaten by other animals, animals do not evolve themselves to be unpalatable, because there is a biological cycle process in nature, and every organism must have natural enemies to maintain the stability of the ecological environment.

I don't think the main thing is that I don't have this ability, and everything is mutually reinforcing, this is a very normal natural law, and we can't go against the natural law.

The spotted donkey once lived in Africa, known as the "animal paradise", it can not only guard the home, but also pull carts and carry goods, and be a good helper for humans. However, because of the delicious meat quality and high yield, the locals hunted the donkey wildly. Eventually, the spotted donkey became extinct in 1883.

Marsupial possums, when they encounter predators, will not run away, but will pretend to be dead, lying motionless on the ground for several hours, at the same time will secrete a special smell, similar to the smell of corpses, making it difficult for predators to eat, no matter what the animal becomes, humans will find a way to eat it, so these creatures do not need to make themselves very difficult to eat for the sake of human beings, a natural enemy, because they can't escape.

No, biological evolution is all about better adapting to the environment and preventing being eaten, and organisms can evolve in other directions, not towards unpalatable, which is not in line with science.

It's also possible, because there is a creature that has never evolved because of laziness, and only has bones on its body, and has no natural predators to live for a long time.

In China, there is a word called being able to eat is a blessing, whether it is flying in the sky, swimming in the water, running underground, in the eyes of the Chinese are delicious food, as long as you want to eat nothing is not eaten, no matter how strange the appearance, whether the body has toxins, after being treated with unique Chinese cooking methods, can become a food served to the table, it is because of such many creatures on the earth face a very embarrassing situation, even endangered.

Crayfish is the favorite food of many netizens in summer, make a skewer on the side of the road, call a plate of crayfish, and drink a cup of draft beer, not to mention how hearty it is, but do you know that crayfish is a major species that invades China, as a species of invasive creature, after arriving in China, it has not been grown in a large area but has been eaten as a protected animal, so that now the crayfish on the market are obtained through breeding, in addition to crayfish There are many animals, It has become an endangered creature because of human gluttony.

This is the Stella sea cow, once thought to be the round shape of a mermaid, in the course of a sea expedition, the zoologists and his crew encountered danger, when there was no food, ready to go hungry, they found the Stella sea cow at sea, so they fed it to fill their stomachs, luckily survived, and then returned to the shore, he revealed to the people around him that there was a creature in the sea with very delicious flesh, in a hundred passes, the Stella sea cow was caught frantically, In just 26 years, the Stella manatee was on the verge of extinction.

There is also a creature called the spotted donkey, which once lived in Africa, and like the common donkey, it was an important means of transportation, when humans first discovered that its meat was delicious. Most of it was brought to the table, eventually leading to extinction. Seeing this, many people will ask, since their meat has become so delicious that they will be hunted by humans, will they evolve into very unpalatable creatures in the future to protect themselves?

In fact, in nature, in order to survive, there are many organisms that have evolved a protective mechanism, such as the venom of a poisonous snake in the ocean, the toxins in the body of the pufferfish, etc., there are many creatures on land that have their first reaction after encountering danger is to lie on the ground and wait for death, and some creatures will secrete a very unpleasant smell and smoke their opponents away.

There are countless creatures in nature that have such self-preservation abilities. In the future, these creatures are likely to evolve different abilities to protect their own lives, and humans may not want this to happen, and may continue to let these fat creatures be served to the human table through artificial intervention. What do you think about this?

Yes, it is likely that in the future, these creatures will evolve different abilities to protect their lives.

Unpalatable meat will evolve, for example, the meat of the monitor lizard is particularly unpalatable, and its meat contains toxins.

No. Because the evolution of organisms is controlled by the environment, not for self-preservation, organisms do not evolve unpalatable meat in order not to be eaten.

There will still be this possibility, after all, there are many times when they point out the survival of Zhengxiao and slowly explore the relevant prudent rules, in this way they can make themselves safer.

Yes. Survival of the fittest, in an environment, in order to survive, organisms will evolve in the right direction, and it is also possible to change their own flesh quality.

I don't think so, the flesh of living things depends on the food they eat, and there is a food chain in the biosphere, and people can't break this food chain. If organisms evolve in order not to be eaten, the food chain of the biosphere will be broken, which does not quite conform to the rules of the moling circle of living beings.

It depends on whether it is natural or human. If it is a natural situation, then how they evolve and how they evolve, this is uncontrollable, maybe tens of thousands of years and hundreds of thousands of years later, chickens will not be chickens, geese will not be like geese anymore, the taste may have changed, those fruit trees are the same, who knows if they will be after how many thousands of years, the fruits will become poisonous.

If it is the case of human intervention, then rest assured, they will only become more and more delicious, and the types and styles of fruits will also be varied.

We human beings have been able to develop to the present, they have evolved step by step, and it has been proved by practice that our ancestors were apes, and we were able to slowly evolve from apes to eventually become human stereotypes, and the process in the middle is to abandon a lot of unnecessary things, and also develop some,Some people can't help but wonder if animals have evolved to be difficult to eat in order to avoid being eaten. The answer is unquestionable, and of course it is impossible to become unpalatable in order to avoid being eaten, because evolution is uncertain and does not know whether it is good or bad to bring about change.

All organisms are evolved and re-evolved, "natural selection, survival of the fittest" illustrates the impact of the environment on the evolution of all organisms, with the development of science and technology, it is now known that the fundamental cause of evolution is genes, each organism has its own genes, each gene is uncertain, may mutate, although some genes can not easily mutate, and gene mutation is uncertain, and do not know what kind of results will be brought, to put it bluntly, gene mutation is random, It is beyond the control of the organism itself, so it is not known whether it will bring benefits or disadvantages.

The outcome of the evolution of animals is unknown, because animals themselves cannot control their own genetic mutations. It's just that after the mutation, some animals will try to survive over time, while others can only be eliminated, such as giraffes, because the grass on the ground is eating less and less, and they can only find ways to eat the grass in higher places, so some short necks will be eliminated, and the long neck gene will develop.

In the end, it is impossible for animals to evolve to be difficult to eat because they avoid being eaten, because evolution is uncertain, including what those animals will develop into in a thousand years, everything is unknown, and we don't know whether the results of evolution will be beneficial or unfavorable, we can only follow the environment to see which evolution is beneficial.

No, even if it is difficult to eat, it will still be eaten in the biological world, because in order to survive, the evolutionary direction will only be more convenient to escape.

It's possible. Because organisms evolve in order to survive, it is very likely that animals will evolve to be difficult to eat and protect themselves.

No, the structure of animals is already very stable, it is very difficult to evolve, and it is impossible for animals to judge whether they are good or not.

It is uncertain whether the result of a genetic mutation is good or bad for the organism, and frankly, there is no concept of a genetic mutation, and it is not known whether the result of such a mutation is good or bad. Therefore, biological evolution does not seek advantages and avoid weaknesses.