What will you do if your leader asks you to be a villain and offend your colleagues?

In the workplace, we often encounter such things, and the leader asks us to be evil people and offend our colleagues. So what do we do when we encounter this situation? It is indeed a difficult choice to be a leader on one side and a colleague on the other.

For me, at this time, I can only choose to be with the leader. Because I still need this job, I can only choose to listen to him. If I had any other choice, then naturally I wouldn't have listened to him.

Because if a leader has such a careful eye, then he is not suitable to lead us, and he is not suitable to be our leader. It is impossible for us to have a future with such a person, so for this situation, I believe that many people have a choice in their hearts. So how do we do it?

Let's take a brief look at it below. <>

The first is to communicate well with the leader. At this time, the leader asked us to offend our colleagues, so naturally, we need to understand the specific situation, so we need to communicate with them more conscientiously. In this way, we can only know some specific situations, and we can know how to make the right choice, so the specific reasons are very important.

Second, communicate with your colleagues. If, indeed, we don't have a better choice, then this is the time to communicate with our colleagues. We need to tell them something about the specifics, including what kind of behavior we are going to do, so that we don't misunderstand us after communicating with them, and only then can we minimize its impact.

So I hope you can pay attention to it and choose the right way. <>

I hope you can take it seriously, because these things are closely related to our lives, and only if we can treat them correctly, can we reduce its impact. Therefore, everyone must pay attention to it, and don't really have any misunderstandings, so I hope you can be cautious, after all, it is implicated with our own interests.

I'm sure the leader won't let me do it, but if the leader has to do it, I'll have to obey. But I will be very strategic with my colleague and try not to offend him.

If the leader asks me to offend my colleagues as a villain, I generally won't do it. Generally speaking, and the leader doesn't tell me about it directly, so I pretend to be deaf and dumb and don't know about such a thing. Won't do it.

The leader asks you to offend your colleagues as a villain, first of all, I have to show my attitude, and secondly, I will politely refuse the leader's request, and I must have my own principles and bottom line.

I will choose to refuse directly, this kind of thankless thing, why do you do it, and the leader is obviously using you as a gunman, I think it is better to leave this kind of person as soon as possible.

I would reject my boss's offer and tell my colleague about it, and if my boss troubled me over this matter, I would apply for labor arbitration.

The leader asks you to raise a gun to hurt someone, and if you don't do it, it is against the leader, but you can shoot the gun crookedly.

How to protect yourself in the workplaceWhen you enter the society and start working, it is inevitable that your career life will be a little difficult. For example, if the leader wants to be a good person, let you act as a villain to do things for him and offend his colleagues. At this time, most people are very entangled in this, dang, offend colleagues, inappropriately, offend the boss, both of which are extremely bad consequences.

So what can we do to protect ourselves correctly and be like a fish in water in the workplace? <>

White face is always a good corner in people's hearts, and black face is the opposite, most people are unwilling to sing black face as a villain. But as a "worker."''We tend not to refuse a request from our boss. First, it will bring the relationship between yourself and your leaders closer and increase the probability of promotion and salary increase; Second, you can get benefits, the leader lets you do things, and generally speaking, there will be corresponding returns.

The only bad thing is that you will offend your colleagues, so this is a dilemma. Of course, if the colleague has a mediocre or not very good relationship with you, we can make the best choice. Or you can have a plan and another choice, and when the leader asks you to offend a colleague with whom you have a good relationship, you can feel free and boldly refuse him.

In the workplace, you must be tactful, distinguish the situation, and not blindly obey or resist, otherwise the result will be disappointing or worse. There is no such thing as an easy adult world, and you need to make careful choices in your work and life. I hope everyone can be at home in the workplace.

This situation is difficult to protect myself, I can only relay the leader's requirements, and then make some comfort and adjustment to the employee. Try to make him not hold a grudge against me.

You should decisively refuse the leader's request, hoping that the leader can let yourself go, because doing so will offend many people and express your thoughts.

You should do it according to some of the leader's requirements, and if your colleague is very smart, he should know that you are helpless to do so.

The leader let me offend my colleagues, I feel that if I want to protect myself, I have to say implicitly to my colleagues, whether I can understand it or not, it all depends on his personal wisdom, and there is no way to refuse the tasks assigned by the leader.

The most despised are those things that flatter and play with people. Without yourself, for your own good than bullying others to give yourself a calamity, pull the back, want to bully me, you don't think about it. I will give it back to you one by one.

When I'm done with this, I'm sure to be honest with my colleagues, so that I'll probably be better, and at the same time, I'll be less malicious to me.

After I finish this work, I will explain it to my colleagues in time to solve this misunderstanding, and it will not cause any impact on myself.

You can communicate this matter with your colleagues in advance, and tell your colleagues that this matter is arranged by the leader, and you have no way to refuse the leader, and I hope that your colleagues will not blame yourself.

First of all, we should have a clear understanding of this matter, and secondly, we should also make a reasonable arrangement, and we should also apologize to our colleagues after offending people.

The first thing is to refuse, and you must handle the relationship with your colleagues, you must pay attention to the way and method when speaking, and never offend people.

At this time, you only need to convey the meaning of the leader, and the sensible colleague understands that it has nothing to do with you.

In the face of such a thing, when I communicate with my colleague, I will directly tell him that it is the meaning of the leader, and I also act according to his orders.

Do your own thing and keep your bottom line. Good guys and bad guys are the same. Whoever believes in me believes, and whoever does not believe.

You figure out the situation first, who pays you? Blindly used to her, in the end she took the money and didn't do anything, and you didn't do it?

The leader asks you to offend your colleagues as a villain, how to refuse tactfully? This brings us to the art of getting along in the workplace.

Shelving is not about not responding for a long time, but choosing some nods or more perfunctory ways to deal with the past when you are face-to-face. Wait for a period of time after this incident, and the leader makes you offend your colleagues less eager, and then look for a suitable opportunity to let the leader understand your true thoughts.

Such a shelving approach would be a good solution to the conflict between the two. In many cases, the leader offends his colleagues because of an appreciation for you, and of course, it will inevitably become a tool for the leader to implement reforms.

In any case, it shows that they have a certain role in leadership. In this case, you must be careful about your words and actions and do not take a hard-hitting approach. Although I want to refuse tactfully, such a situation should not be tactful.

Even if you think it's tactful, the leader will eventually be able to hear that you don't want to help. So it's best to put it aside for a while.

If the leader wants to let himself suppress his colleagues, it must be because the leader has some misunderstanding about his colleagues. At this time, if you don't want to agree to the leader offending your colleagues, the most suitable way should be to find the right opportunity for the leader to better understand his colleagues, understand the behavior of his colleagues and some helpful styles for the company and leaders.

I believe that over time, leaders will gradually discover some of the contributions made by colleagues in the company. This consumes a lot of time, but if you really don't want to offend your colleagues or if your colleagues are important to you, you can choose to be a peacemaker.

Peacemakers are also not easy to do, and you have to think about whether you can spend so much time and energy dealing with some things for the sake of colleague relationships.

The leader asked me to offend my colleagues as a villain, and I definitely want to refuse, because I am a kind person, and I will never deliberately target a certain person, let alone offend a colleague, and direct refusal is the best way.

The leader asked me to be a villain and offend a colleague, and I would refuse tactfully: I can tell him that this colleague has helped me, and I can't be an ungrateful villain in other things, even if our two families have a relationship, this will not be in line with my personality, and it will also make the elders ugly, so you can refuse tactfully.

You should just refuse directly, you can explain your own views to your boss, after all, you have to get along with your colleagues for a long time, if you offend your colleagues by being evildoers, this is not conducive to your development in the company.

If the leader asks me to offend my colleagues as a villain, I will refuse, and if he will let me continue to do such a thing, I will leave my job directly and not do it here.

If the leader asks you to be a villain and offend a colleague, I think you should politely refuse and tell him that your relationship is very good.

You just refuse directly, how can a leader manage people without even taking this responsibility, and you don't dare to care about you if you contradict him.

The leader does this, in fact, it is a bit excessive, you should refuse him, tell him, I am good friends with this person, I can't offend him, if I offend her, how will we get along in the future?

To express one's attitude, one should also appropriately leave some leeway for the leader, not to be too direct, but also to talk about one's actual situation.

Keep your own career, manage your own position, to do that the factory can't do without you, need you, at this time is the grandfather, what is the chief manager, you must hold the technology and not leak, without your own factory will have a power outage holiday, you are the protagonist! Do you understand? Got it and liked it.

Don't always think about being a good person, because sometimes a leader needs someone to help her be a bad person.

I'm not very good at it, and my boss can find someone who has experience in this area to do it.

You can't refuse, you can only do small evil deeds or turn evil into good deeds.

First of all, know how to replace the target. Secondly, a sense of proximity, which is an act of thin favorability. Also, a sense of fairness that makes everyone feel that you don't have individualism. Finally, a sense of responsibility to eliminate the worries of the future after the completion of the matter.

First: In order to avoid this scapegoating situation in the workplace, you need to know how to replace the target. The core of the target substitution is to reduce the hostility of the assigned person to oneself and replace the hostility that may be towards the higher-ups, because the prestige of the higher-ups is much higher than yours.

The objects you arrange have a certain sense of reverence for them, and in this mentality, your work can be carried out well without offending others.

Second: a sense of proximity, which is a kind of behavior with a thin sense of goodwill. Gaining a certain amount of favor at the initial stage will reduce the rebelliousness of the other party in the implementation process.

For example, when taking on a leadership task and scheduling it, take the initiative to say that this task can be very difficult at times. I hope you can give me a chance to complete this task with you and let me learn more. This behavior has a certain warning effect, indicating that hard phenomena will occur in the process.

Third: a sense of fairness, so that everyone feels that you are not individualistic. A low-level mistake that a lot of people make is that when arranging, they will clearly say who will do what and who will be responsible for what, and this feeling will make everyone feel like you have arranged their lives.

Through your words, everyone will be more receptive to your arrangement, and you have given up on the strategy you have shown to your leaders, so this is a further indication that you are not deliberately making things difficult for them.

Fourth: a sense of responsibility, to eliminate the worries after the completion of the matter. Many people like to organize and complete an activity without making any summary, not explaining to you, or even considering whether others are unhappy or not, which gives you a chance to have an opinion on you.

Right way: Pick yourself up before you're done and work hard for a reward when you're done. Communicate promptly if there are any issues during the completion process.

After completion, take the initiative to express your recognition of the leader.

Euphemistically refuses to lead, the leader may do this selfishly, or it may be for the interests of the overall situation, but he should not be the villain, he should be the leader himself to be the wicked.

will choose to refuse, and at this time they will say that they are also very inconvenient, or that they are not familiar with each other and have no way to do it.