In public toilets, which is dirtier, squatting pit or toilet?

The public toilets are very dirty, and they are not very hygienic because they are not as clean as at home.

The splash of toilets and squatting pits is very large when flushing, especially the splash height of the squatting pit can reach the waist of a person. And the smell will be more pronounced when squatting, which means that the bacteria have spread to the nose and mouth. The toilet has a lid, and if you close the lid on the toilet bowl when flushing, it can well isolate external bacteria.

So the squat pit is a little dirtier.

The toilet will be dirtier. Because if there is a toilet in the toilet, there will be many people who touch the toilet, and there will be a lot of bacteria on the face of the toilet lid, which will be more contagious.

The toilet is dirtier, and many people will use the toilet, which will slowly carry a lot of germs, which may affect the health of the body.

Toilet. Direct contact with the toilet makes it easier for microorganisms such as parasites and bacteria to enter the skin and cause diseases.

First of all, from the perspective of hygiene, squatting does not directly touch the toilet, which effectively prevents the spread and infection of bacteria, especially in public places, such as enterprises, institutions, schools, hospitals and hotels, etc., countless people come and go every day, who knows what infectious diseases are? However, I think most of the current hospitals have done a good job, most of them are squatting, and they are also advanced induction toilets, flushing automatic induction, no need to press the flush with your hands, reducing the chance of infection, but for humane considerations, a small number of toilets are also set up, which is convenient for the disabled and seriously ill to use.

But I think that the current hotel is not as good as the hospital to do, it is really in need of improvement, I have been to several provincial capitals because of tourism, I have lived in a few hotels, I am not willing to live expensive, the price of living is generally about one or two hundred yuan, there are almost no squatting toilets, all are toilets, I am simply unbearable with cleanliness, but there is really no way, before each use, first use the shower head to flush the edge of the toilet and flush, wash and wash, and wipe with toilet paper several times, Finally, I put a circle of clean toilet paper on it, but I still don't want to use it, and because of this, I don't want to travel anymore, stay at home and don't want to go anywhere.

Here I would like to take this opportunity to appeal that hotels and guesthouses across the country should really learn more from the practice in hospitals, after all, it is a public place, for the health of most people, it is better to be clean, or to squat.

First of all, when you defecate in a natural squatting position, most of the weight of the body is pressed on the thighs, and it also naturally compresses the colon, which is conducive to promoting the elimination of stool.

Secondly, when a person defecates, he mainly relies on the puborectalis muscle to exert force, which will form a sharp forward angle with the rectum, which is medically known as the anorectal angle. Studies have shown that when using a toilet toilet to defecate, the anorectal angle is about 90 degrees, which requires more effort and time for the human body, which can easily induce hemorrhoids and constipation; The use of squatting pit to defecate, the anorectal angle can reach 100 degrees, the human body consumes less effort and time, and the defecation will be relatively easy.

In addition, by "squatting" to defecate, the buttocks do not touch other objects, clean and hygienic, do not have to worry about ** will be infected with some bacteria or viruses.

In public places, it's better to squat, especially in China. The Chinese are all Ying Yong squatting pits. Second, what about squatting, if you squat for a long time, you will have to leave later.

It will save people waiting to go to the toilet at the back door. If he is doing things, the toilet will sit comfortably, and he will spend longer. Third, the squatting pit occupies a smaller area.

Fourth, the cost of squatting is cheaper. The sanitation of the fifth squatting pit is awesome, and the bidet toilet is simpler, so I think it is better to use the squatting pit toilet in public places.

Of course, it is a squatting pit, although the toilet will look high-end and atmospheric, but it is really not hygienic, it is difficult to keep the toilet clean in public places, because the quality of the people who use it is different, even if it looks clean, but there are invisible bacteria that are easy to spread through the toilet, and the squatting pit can avoid direct contact.

In modern life, most family bathrooms and high-end places use toilets, and some families in schools and office buildings use squatting pits. From the point of view of the place of use, there is a market for toilet and squatting toilet, and there is a close relationship between the two application places. Do you know which is better, toilet or squat?

Which is better, a toilet or a squatting toilet? Compare the pros and cons of the two from three aspects, and you can clearly distinguish which one is right for you.

1. Which is better, toilet or squatting toilet - appearance.

In terms of appearance, the toilet looks more fashionable and beautiful than the squatting toilet, and the toilets on the market are diverse in style, with a strong sense of fashion, and various smart toilets have also appeared one after another, but they are generally more expensive than squatting toilets. But for squatting toilets, the appearance is not so good-looking, it looks simple and unfashionable, and it is cheaper than a toilet.

Second, which is better, toilet or squatting toilet - toilet.

Due to the different design characteristics of the toilet and the squatting toilet, the different postures when going to the toilet also produce different points. The combination of toilet and European-style bathroom makes bathroom life more comfortable, and the toilet is labor-saving, the leg weight bearing is small, and the elderly or frail people are more suitable, but it is not easy to defecate, and sit on the toilet.

It is easy to indulge people to go to the toilet for a long time, which is prone to hemorrhoids and so on. The use of a squatting toilet when going to the toilet requires a long time of squatting, and the elderly and obese people may have difficulty using the toilet, but the simple squatting toilet is smoother. At the same time, when using a squatting toilet, the legs are subjected to tremendous pressure, which will urge the user to "get things done" quickly and reduce the chance of hemorrhoids.

3. Which is better, toilet or squatting toilet - hygiene.

Unhygienic is the biggest disadvantage of the toilet, especially in public places, the human body is in direct contact with the toilet, and the parasites, bacteria, etc. attached to the toilet are easy to cross-infect, therefore, you will find that there are not many toilets used in general public places, and the toilet is more suitable for family use. The squatting toilet does not have such a problem as being unhygienic, because the user's ** will not have direct contact with the squatting toilet, so it will not contact the parasites or bacteria on the squatting pit, etc., which is relatively more hygienic, so according to his characteristics, the squatting toilet is generally used more in public places.

Toilets and squatting pits have their own advantages and disadvantages, in the choice of the two, should be based on the place of use, the use of the group of people to make a decision, the elderly at home is recommended to use the toilet, public places are best to use squatting toilets to reduce bacterial or parasite infection, the family can use the toilet. The above is the introduction of the disadvantages of the toilet and the squatting toilet, through comparison, have you found that which of the two is better? In short, there is no good or bad between a toilet and a squatting toilet, and it is good in an appropriate place and in line with the needs of the user, so there is no good or bad between a toilet and a squatting toilet.

Squatting pits. Squatting pits, can be isolated. Contact with everything such as the toilet. Reduce the transmission of cross-infection or some public diseases. It feels more hygienic this way. More suitable for public health and public places.

So, squatting. More suitable for public places.

Squatting pit is more suitable for public places, because everyone has it in public places, choosing a squatting pit is much more hygienic than the toilet, the toilet will be relatively dirty around it, and if the toilet is not clean after the buttocks and the toilet are in contact, it will lead to bacterial infection, and even cause some diseases, while the squatting toilet ** is not in direct contact.

Squatting pits are more suitable for public places.

From the aspect of hygiene, the toilet must be relatively unhygienic, and the human body is in direct contact with the toilet, which is easy to lead to bacterial infection, etc., especially in public places. However, if you use the toilet, you can choose according to the family situation, but if you use the toilet, you must pay attention to regular cleaning.

In terms of health, squatting is smoother, and sitting on the toilet to defecate will squeeze the intestinal tissue, which is not conducive to smooth bowel movements. In addition, squatting will greatly reduce the probability of intestinal diverticulosis and hemorrhoids. There are also studies that show that squatting is more efficient!

From the point of view of the product itself, the appearance of the toilet is fashionable and beautiful, and the decoration is relatively easy, but it is higher, and the toilet is prone to failure, and squatting is the most problematic flushometer, so from the product itself, the squatting toilet is the best.

Hello, if the landlord considers from a public place from a point of view, it must be more suitable for squatting. Because people use it in public places, many people use it, because if you use it crosswise, if someone is infected with the disease, then it may spread through the toilet. And the toilet is generally very sure to contact people's **, so relatively speaking, the toilet hygiene is not as good as the squatting pit.

Because the squatting pit actually does not contact people in the process of use, and although the degree of hygiene is worse, it is better in terms of spreading diseases. Moreover, the toilets used in public use are also relatively dirty, and the cleaning is relatively poor, which is more likely to spread some diseases. If you squat in the pit, you will have these defects of the toilet, and the squatting pit is more hygienic and should not spread diseases, so the squatting pit should be better.

For public places with a lot of people, squatting pits are more suitable. Because people don't have to physically touch the place. And some people in the toilet are very easy to leave germs on it if they do not pay attention to public health, thus infecting others.

Squatting pits, of course, are more suitable for utensils used in public places. Because squatting does not come into direct contact with people like toilets, there is much less chance of spreading bacteria and viruses. Sitting on the toilet is different.

A lot of people, especially the elderly. ** debris that falls from the body will be left on the toilet, which is very unhygienic. Therefore, squatting in public is the safest, least easy to spread diseases, and the most hygienic sanitary ware.

I think the squatting pit is more suitable for public places, on the one hand, it is more convenient to clean and can reduce the amount of cleaning labor, and on the other hand, the squatting pit is more hygienic.

Squatting pits are more suitable for public places, where more people use them, and squatting pits do not have direct contact with people like toilets.

Therefore, squatting pits have much less chance of spreading bacteria and viruses than toilets.

From the health aspect**, squatting is smoother, and sitting on the toilet to defecate will squeeze the intestinal tissue, which is not conducive to smooth bowel movements.

Moreover, if the toilet is used in public places, it is easy to cause damage and needs to be repaired frequently, which is not as economical as squatting, easy to maintain, and has a long service life.

When the new house is renovated, it will encounter such a problem, whether to install squatting or toilet in the toilet? In the north, most families may install toilets, but in the south, many places will install squatting poop, some people think that squatting is more hygienic, and some people think that toilets are more hygienic, so which of the two is cleaner and more hygienic?

1. Some people think that everyone will sit on the toilet and go to the toilet, so it looks very unclean.

People who think that squatting is cleaner and more hygienic generally feel that when they use the toilet, everyone will sit on it, so it will look very unclean. And every time you go to the toilet, you have to lift the lid, which will also make some people feel unhygienic.

Because there will be a lot of water flushed out at once when flushing the toilet, so there will be a lot of fine particles floating into the air from the toilet, if people stand aside to flush the toilet, it is likely that a large number of bacteria will be inhaled into the body, although these fine particles are difficult to find with the naked eye, but it is obvious that this will be more unhygienic, which is why many people think that squatting will be more unhygienic. And the toilet.

Since there is a lid, this is well prevented. Of course, there are also some squats that have been covered with lids, which can also better avoid this situation.

3. Which kind of toilet to use also has a lot to do with personal preference.

Some people like to squat, and some people like to sit on the toilet, of course, some people think that there is a disadvantage on the left, it is easy for people to go to the toilet for too long, because it is more labor-saving to use this side, so many people go to the toilet while looking at their mobile phones when going to the toilet, which leads to a significant increase in the time to go to the toilet. Of course, this is not a good habit. So as for what kind of toilet to use, you still need to decide according to your hobbies, of course, cleanliness and hygiene are also very important.

I think it's cleaner than the toilet, especially the toilet for public health is very dirty, at least the squatting toilet will not come into direct contact with **.

The toilet is actually cleaner and more hygienic than the squatting pit. Because when we squat in the pit and flush the water, the cyclone will carry up the bacteria, and it can also bring the bacteria to the level of the person's nose, and the toilet bowl is mostly siphon, and the bacteria are carried into the sewer. Compared to the toilet, it is a little more hygienic.

The squatting pit is actually not cleaner and more hygienic than the toilet, but the squatting pit is more unhygienic, because the flush squatting pit will splash a large number of bacteria and microorganisms when flushing, when we use the squatting pit, the breathing area is lowered, the contact distance with the excrement is closer, and it is easier to inhale the pollutants suspended in the air, while the siphon toilet with the lid flushing is less bacteria flushed out.