Why are Chinese strategic from ancient times to the present, while foreigners prefer frontal hard st

In the history of world wars, most foreigners are tough and rigid and the Chinese pay attention to strategy and strategy, which is similar to what savages eat raw meat and civilized people eat cooked meat, and on the surface it is only a difference between "raw and cooked", but in essence it is a gap in human production practices and the dividing line between civilization and barbarism.

Historically, China, as one of the four ancient civilizations, is indeed a model and model for Western civilization in many respects, and if we look at Western history, we can find that even if Europeans and Americans engage in some conspiracies in fighting wars, in the eyes of the Chinese, they are just conspiracies that can be seen through at a glance.

Summarizing the wars of the past dynasties in China, you can always find the corresponding chapters and sentences in "The Art of War". One reason is that it is abstract enough, if you can't find the Art of War, then go to the Tao Te Ching to find it, and you can always find it; One reason is that after playing the Ten Rings, and then corroborating with "The Art of War", it will definitely be confirmed.

So, is there no strategy? Useful, sometimes very useful. But it's not that trickery-level art of war, it's a scheming-level strategy.

And this kind of strategy often needs to be matched by the situation. So, it's hard to generalize a general pattern. And as far as specific wars are concerned, they are often crushed by strength.

The persistence of Westerners in the quality of equipment obscures the brilliance of their military strategy. Because of the knightly system in medieval Europe, the army was mainly composed of knights and their retinue. These knights are able to buy the best ** equipment for themselves.

Over time, Europeans became paranoid and superstitious about the quality of ** equipment. Bows and arrows are the longest-range and most powerful; Armor is the strongest, from chain mail to plate armor, to be honest, it surpasses ancient Chinese armor. Until the early years of the Qing Dynasty, the Qing army seized chain mail in the western region and regarded it as a treasure.

Attacking the unprepared in an operation is really a failure to pay attention to morality and etiquette, and a tough battle will only suffer losses. And war is also a battle of wills, the brave wins when they meet on a narrow road, and toughness is also a strategy and method. For example, in the battle of Shangganling, the three regiments of the 7th Division of the US Army basically did not have a fully formed company, and they could not be forced to go on, so they were replaced, and the US army was no more rigid than the volunteers.

The revolutionary fighting spirit of the volunteers, who are not afraid of hardship and death, has made the US military fearful.

The volunteers could march more than 100 miles in the ice and snow overnight, grope their way forward barefoot in the snow so as not to alarm the enemy, engage with the US troops in close combat, dare to pull grenades and die with the enemy, dare to sacrifice themselves to blow up pillboxes, block gun holes, and be burned without moving. These U.S. troops can't do it.

Because the history and culture of foreigners is not as profound as that of us Chinese, we Chinese have always paid attention to the strategy of the art of war, and have never been impulsive in doing things but have paid attention to acting in an opportunistic manner.

Because the Chinese talk about etiquette, and the frontal just has a feeling of killing a thousand enemies and self-inflicting eight hundred, they like to pay attention to strategy. Foreigners like to be tough because they are influenced by maritime culture.

Because of the early development of Chinese civilization, the invention of writing and paper allowed us to learn to think and communicate, and the military strategy was gradually formed.