Debate on the destruction of monuments against the source

The repair of ancient buildings is not a simple renovation It is necessary to replace the new components, and it will be more beautiful after repair, so what's wrong?

All buildings that are more than 100 years old can be called monuments, and those artifacts are protected because of their historical value. Wood has always been the main material used in Chinese architecture, but since the 19th century, due to political influences, China has begun to introduce foreign architectural features, among which the Upper Bund is the most prominent, mainly because all its exterior walls are made of granite, and the interior is decorated with marble imported from Italy and mosaics with local cultural colors. Over time, it is important to renovate some buildings that have preservation value.

Building materials can be divided into many categories, not all materials can be renovated in Tianjin, among which stone, copper, iron, etc. are examples of materials that can be renovated.

Ancient ruins are very important, and if they are destroyed in our generation, then our descendants do not know how sorry they are! How nice it is to use modern technology to restore without adding other elements, to protect the monument without changing the original style! So that's right!

Our class has been doing this recently, and I'm the main debater on the opposing side, and I think like this:

Positive

Such casual correction of ancient ruins is a disrespect for ancient ruins.

AgainstBut I think that the current society is developing, science and technology are also developing ancient ruins are particularly important to us in terms of interests and values, so the ancient ruins are still ancient ruins after all, and will eventually age, so through the continuous renovation and renovation of our human beings, the ancient ruins not only have not changed their meaning and value, but also become more beautiful, adding the thoughts and values of our current social people, which is an innovation, an innovation that does not bind the old traditions of the Chinese people, a combination of tradition and modern science and technology, Wouldn't this ancient relic be perfect, more valuable and more significant?

destroying the original appearance of the monument, barely there is no happiness, forcibly increasing the amount that does not get anything, and destroying the original taste of the monument;

It puts a burden on monuments, and with these modern facilities, it will encourage people to destroy monuments even more;

We have always adhered to our style of preserving monuments. Although it has been destroyed. After the reconstruction.

Although it is already intact. But it has also lost its original flavor and material benefits. Of course, you will be questioned by the other party.

Just use your brain, you can't see what the other person is saying, you can't help you. You just have to think about the meaning of existence around protecting it. May you succeed.

Waste of resources! It's a broken thing to repair again.。。。

Expeditions can damage the environment.

Rebuttal: Our expedition is to better protect the environment, through scientific exploration of those areas that human beings have not yet deeply understood, in order to better protect the natural heritage of these needle hoops, we go to Antarctica to study it, and explore how to avoid the destruction of the Antarctic environment, so the exploration in the modern sense is to better protect the environment, if the other party has to say that the two are confused, then may I ask the other party whether the expedition is more harmful to the environment or not the exploration is more destructive?

technology to develop the argument word.

Opposite: When people are like people who play a triumphant song for science and technology, please don't forget to remember, science and technology

1. The historical and artistic significance of the ancient building itself is indestructible.

2. The significance of ancient architecture is an important reference for modern architecture.

3. Advocating the protection of ancient buildings does not mean keeping the old things, but learning from them, and the disadvantages of destroying ancient buildings can also be talked about, such as the demolition of the ancient city wall in Beijing, the demolition of the courtyard, etc., as well as the destruction of some historic sites.