What kinds of kind people are comparable to lack of virtue and should be kept away in time?

All people should have the ability to distinguish between right and wrong, and although they tolerate the shortcomings of others, they should not let others be evil. There is essentially no difference between allowing others to be evil and those who do evil. When a person is unable to dissuade evil in time, but says to the person who has been hurt:

It's an unintentional mistake, why do you hold on to it? This kind of "kindness" seems to be for the benefit of sentient beings, but in fact it is bringing a favorable opportunity for secondary evil.

In daily life, we must prevent ourselves from becoming a hypocrite, and use self-righteous kindness and generosity to ask people to tolerate evil personal behavior. This is also an excessively one-sided and self-oriented attitude towards facing and solving difficulties, so that evil is invisibly indulged and the difficulty factor of evil being suppressed. If there is a person around you who advises you to be generous and kind-hearted, you must stay away from him, and don't say too much to him.

For a hypocrite, all his words are to show his social morality, in his eyes you don't do what he says, you are immoral, no matter how good you say and how well you explain, it is all nonsense. Instead of doing useless work on the side of the hypocrite, it is better to laugh it off, and stay away from him to make a decision, so that your injured and destroyed heart will be better.

A wise person will have a sense of the situation, either participating in the joys and sorrows of others, standing in a reasonable perspective and not slowing down, or standing in a righteous perspective to help solve difficulties. Only those who seem to be smart and hidden wise will not only participate in other people's affairs, but also need to please both sides, this kind of "mellowness". People usually call such people "adulterous" people, and they are the most tiresome.

When some differences arise, it is a strong argument that the public says that the public is justified and the public is reasonable, and in the middle is mixed a person who pleases both sides, and the two sides do encouragement and recognition, causing the original conflict with each other, and the problem is even worsened. In that way, the person who pleases both sides is more evil than hypocrisy, because her purpose is to stand in the attitude of "not provoking people" and give herself the title of "good person". And they will also hype up how much energy and time they put into it in order to be "good for others".

This kind of two-faced person not only does not really help others, but is also a person with distorted views. If there is such a person around you, you must stop contacting you to ensure that your future life is not messed up by such a person.

I think the first type is tolerance without a bottom line, some very evil people, the second type is a person who will please both sides, and the third type is someone who can't see being a military advisor afterwards.

The first point is that some people are very kind, but they do things that are not glorious, the second point is that they are very kind on the surface, but they often bully people, such people must stay away, and the third point is that people who have no virtue in their mouths must stay away, not a good person,

No matter what happens, it is not good to always advise you to be generous, and the "kindness" of this kind of person is comparable to a lack of morality, and you should stay away in time.

The moon is cloudy and sunny, and people have both good and evil sides. To be a man, you can not be kind, but don't lack virtue.

Human beings are born without distinction between good and evil, and they do not know what good and evil are. We all came into the world with simplicity in mind, and we all have been kind. However, all human beings are born with an inferiority to their roots.

Good and evil come from people's desires, and moderate control and not excessive overflow are good; Overindulgence and unscrupulousness become evil.

In the past, kindness was a quality, and now, kindness has become a luxury. It is a blessing to suffer, and it is becoming less and less convincing.

Kindness itself is a virtue, and there is nothing wrong with kindness itself. Kindness is exchanged for other people's gains, and kindness is exchanged for blind accommodation. Kindness is increasingly becoming one's own weakness. Kindness, as if put on a cloak of cowardice.

To be a human being, we must distinguish between good and evil. Ambiguous, no bottom line, life, and a muddy life. In life, you can not be kind, but you must have a conscience and don't lack virtue. Cheating and abduction, stealing and cheating, trying to be quick for a while, not a long-term solution.

You can be unkind, but don't be hypocritical, be more honest; To be a man, you can not be kind, but don't lack virtue, be more sincere; You can be a man, you can not be kind, but don't be a villain, be more honest.

In life, you can be unkind. However, to live with a clear conscience. The heart is open-minded and walks in all directions, and the road is smooth and smooth.

Hello friend.

It seems that you must have annoyed this simple and kind person.

That's why he said such unpleasant things.

If yes, then quickly apologize to him.

I'm afraid that now this simple and kind person is also saying such a sentence with a lot of guilt!

Turn hostility into friendship!

From a scientific point of view, it doesn't depend on what you do.

If you really do something that lacks virtue, you will have karma if the other party says it or not.

The other party said that the lack of virtue will only make the other party increase their oral karma (bad energy).