Confucius The reason why Qin Shi Huang voted the most

Confucius has been the decoration of the superstructure of Chinese society for thousands of years, and his influence is not only reflected in the distant past, but also deeply imprinted his imprint in the Chinese national psyche, and this influence has spread to many countries around the world with the expansion of the history of the Chinese Empire again and again, after all, the Confucianism founded by Confucius has a certain degree of stability in the rule of the rulers and the education of the people, which is incomparable with other sects; With Marco Polo's epic description of China, Confucius began to be recognized in Western countries. If China is really on the rise now, the only choice that can be matched in terms of cultural heritage is Confucius and the Confucianism he represents. Although this choice is also a trade-off.

Of course, in the hearts of the middle-class people, who are basically the main users of the Internet, the emptiness of the soul brought about by materialization, and the revival of Confucianism can also give them some psychological comfort. Like Sifu, Confucius stands.

Qin Shi Huang is now a tyrant in Chinese history and the founder of a much-criticized feudal society, but even this acknowledges his merits. The unification of the country and the implementation of many economic changes are just a sieve, and the real merit is to promote the pace of historical progress. In today's society, who else can compare with the meaning of reunifying Taiwan?

What's more, the Mausoleum of the First Emperor, which is still standing, and the people's aftertaste of the most powerful army in the history of China during the Qin period, weighs his weight even more. The founders of the current state of China all said, please see the Qin Emperor and the Han Dynasty.

Personally, I like Qin Shi Huang and don't have a good impression of Confucius.

Qin Shi Huang was recognized as a statesman and military strategist, and Confucius was also a great educator, and the two seemed to be indistinguishable from each other, but they had subtle differences.

Qin Shi Huang, as an emperor, killed countless people, and throughout history, no emperor had no life in his hands, so it could not constitute a capital crime.

One of Confucius's ideas is modesty, but there are times when it proves that he does not admit mistakes, his thinking is excellent, but after all, it is borrowed from Zhou Li, and it is still wrong in some aspects, he pursues great love in the world, but it is not enough in "small love".

In fact, the two can't be compared, saying that no one is perfect, I evaluate personal emotions, but it is undeniable that Confucius is still great.

This should not be compared at all, people from different systems. In terms of power or influence on the state, Qin Shi Huang was greater, and Confucius was even farther.

You say, who is better Lu Ban or Zhuangzi?

It's the same, there's no comparison. It can only be said that they are the best of their kind.

The verdict is not on you or me. However, I personally think that the two have their own merits, but Confucius is superior.

Fighting the world, of course, Qin Shi Huang is powerful!

To educate people, of course, Confucius is more powerful!

I think Confucius.

Because even if Qin Shi Huang did not unify the world.

Others will be unified.

Qin Shi Huang, he unified the world, so that China has a unified idea from then on.

As for Confucius, the current Confucianism has worn out the martial spirit of man.

Of course, Confucius is more powerful! If you become emperors, you will be like Qin Shi Huang! But if you are a student, you may not be able to become a great writer like Confucius!

Zi said: Qin Shi Huang and Confucius are not bulls.

It depends on that aspect, but I still think Confucius is greater

Of course, it was Confucius, he taught and educated people, which was like Qin Shi Huang, burned books and pit Confucianism, overhauled the Great Wall, built the Afang Palace, Terracotta Warriors, and then killed all the skilled craftsmen, it was too cruel.

Is it great? How I don't think.

Qin Shi Huang was actually a man of humility, and Confucius was not a man of ancient times.

If two people meet, they will definitely complement each other. Confucius will not dream of the sigh of Zhou Gong, and Qin Shi Huang will also respect him as a guest and ask for advice from time to time, and history will naturally be rewritten.

Qin Shi Huang would have killed Confucius, because Qin Shi Huang would have killed Confucius because he was the founder of Confucianism.

As long as the bottom line of both parties is not touched, everything is easy to discuss.

The two collided with a spark of affection.

Although the Qin Dynasty has always advocated Legalism and did not exalt Confucianism, it did not want to exterminate Confucianism. In fact, Qin Shi Huang and Qin II have always had many Confucian "doctors" around them. The dialogue between Qin Shi Huang and people, in the record of "Historical Records", in addition to the prime minister and others, is mainly with these Confucian doctors, it can be seen that these doctors have a very high status, often can discuss in front of the emperor, and the prime minister Wang Juan and others also have distinctive Confucian characteristics.

Qin Shi Huang's stone inscriptions in Taishanlang and other places also express respect for Confucianism, many of which are typical Confucian terms, such as "Zhuan Long teachings, men and women are courteous". Later, even in the era of Qin II, Chen Sheng and Wu Guang rebelled, for such a major event, Hu Hai also called "Doctor Zhu Confucian Students" to ask countermeasures, and more than 30 people came forward to answer questions, which shows that Confucian students have been involved in the senior decision-making level of Qin ** to varying degrees. Therefore, Qin Shi Huang cannot talk about his hatred of Confucius.

This is a false proposition, because most of the Confucians in the book-burning pit are monks, and they are the ancestors of the Taoist priests, ......Li Si's master is the Confucian Xunzi, why does Qin Shi Huang hate Kongqiu?

No, Qin Shi Huang respected Legalism and soldiers, and was very repulsive to Confucianism. Confucius was developed when Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, in order to rule the needs, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty "deposed a hundred schools of thought and respected Confucianism alone".

=-= What is the problem, why did Qin Shi Huang go to worship Confucius?

The ideas of any family are just tools of the ruler, okay, isn't Han Wu also deposing the hundred schools? It's just that it lasted until the end of the feudal dynasty, and it seems that the value of Confucianism is more than a little bit higher.

No, Confucianism was the object of suppression in the Qin Dynasty, so it was impossible for Qin Shi Huang to worship the founder of Confucianism.

Qin Shi Huang burned books and pit Confucianism, if Confucius and Qin Shi Huang were in the same era, they would have to be buried alive.

There must not be, Qin Shi Huang admired Legalism at that time, and he burned books and pit Confucianism, how could he go to worship Confucius.

No, Qin Shi Huang resisted all schools of thought in the Warring States Period, and only deposed the hundred schools of thought since the time of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, and respected Confucianism alone.