What do you think of the recent uproar over the China Literature Overlord contract? 100

Awesome, no one will have a position to ask people to spend money to read books in the future, and the free ones are also genuine.

China Literature Group is very far-sighted, and it is not by luck that it can sit in the leading position in the online literature industry.

Now the charging model seems to be able to make profits for the author, but in the long run, there are routines and gunman articles everywhere, and China's online articles can only go downhill.

As for the new contract, it seems to be a trick, but on the premise of improving full attendance and motivating writers to improve their writing skills, it will inevitably lead to a better spring for online articles.

Many authors seem to be cheated, but in fact they forget that if there is no platform for China Literature, not a single word of what they write will be sold.

Drink water and don't forget to dig wells, authors who are bent on falling in the eyes of money, it's time to reflect on your conscience.

I think we should support the author, and don't read the online article without changing the terms, because if the overlord contract takes effect, there will definitely be many authors who will quit the circle, and the quality of the online article will not be guaranteed in the future.

We, the readers, should boycott China Literature and make China Literature lose users, so that China Literature can recognize the unfairness of the contract and give justice to the authors.

As readers, we are also consumers of China Literature, and from this point of view, we can completely avoid recharging and paying for China Literature's products, and secondly, we can reduce the reading of China Literature's texts. In this way, China Literature continues to lose readers and suffer financial losses, and only in this way can China Literature pay more attention to its authors.

What readers can do in this incident is to treat the author's slow or interrupted changes with a peaceful mind, after all, the author's rights and interests are protected in order to produce better works.

The whole network has basically heard of it now.

The Copyright Law has provisions on copyright, but at the same time, there is also a claim for the copyright of the unit, and Cheng Wu and their company's legal counsel or lawyers grasped this point and concocted this contract, and the essence of this entrusted creation contract is not only to buy out the author's rights such as dissemination and distribution, but also to buy out the rights of creation and signature.

From the perspective of the legislative spirit, the original intention of the establishment of the unit's copyright should be compared to the unit's patent in scientific research, because the unit often has experimental research equipment, materials and other conditions that the individual does not have, and provides these conditions to the individual in the process of researching the invention, so the invention patent completed by the individual through the use of these conditions should belong to the unit.

And what is the similarity between online literary creation and scientific research? Whether it is the cost of equipment, the cost of data, or the inventory of reading works that may bring inspiration, it is not a condition that only the unit can provide, so this practice of China Literature is a typical loophole in the law, which runs counter to the true legal spirit of fairness and justice.