What do you think about the incident of a man who fell to death after losing a dog betting?

After looking around, I feel that Zhihu has overdone the matter of dog meat.

Of course, there are many incomprehensible and magical theories and operations of the so-called "dog lovers", but this cannot be a reason for normal people to target "dog lovers" and "dogs".

This matter, although it was a dog he bought himself, is private property. But none of the practices can be described as "extreme", and they are completely frenzied. This is beyond the scope of morality, and I personally feel that it is a lack of human nature.

To take an inappropriate example, the harshest punishment for mankind is "expulsion", that is, the death penalty. However, with the development of human society, those death sentences such as "stoning", "burning at the stake", "car splitting", "Ling Chi" and "beheading" have gradually disappeared, and have been replaced by relatively peaceful lethal injections. The ultimate goal is death, so there is no need to increase its suffering in the means of death, which is probably called "mercy" in human nature.

Things are one yard at a time, and in addition to gambling, the handling of dogs is not illegal. However, what is not illegal is not necessarily right, he has the right to dispose of his property, and we should also have the ability to distinguish between right and wrong.

Finally, there's a little story about dog meat.

I've been eating dog meat since I was a kid. Once I was eating, I was preached by a "dog lover".

Dogs are the most humane, how can you eat dog meat?! ”

I'm going to have my last meal, so eat something good. I owe usury, and people are about to come and cut me. Why don't you lend me money to pay off the debt? I won't be cut after paying back the money. I don't just understand human nature, I can also speak human words. ”(

。Dogs are man's best friend! ”

I'm also your friend, so I can't borrow money or not."

It's because you're my friend that I persuaded you. Start with me, start from the people around you. As long as everyone doesn't eat dog meat, no dog will be stolen and killed. ”∑

As long as we achieve equal wealth and poverty, we can achieve universal harmony and realize communism. Did you donate all your house savings? In this way, communism can be realized, which is my lifelong ideal! ”(

Your ideals have something to do with me!? ”

Then you don't eat dog meat and have something to do with me? (Speechless.)

First of all, it shows that I am not a dog fan, and secondly, I express that I have a great disgust for this kind of person and will definitely stay away from this kind of person.

In the eyes of such a person, there are only two situations, those with use value and those without use value. Never recognize the existence of feelings. It is understandable to eat dog meat, but the way he killed the dog was to fall to death, which can show that he has a malicious revenge psychology for taking advantage of the failed target.

If this kind of person asks for help from others, it is better to say that he is satisfied, but if he is not satisfied, he is likely to maliciously attack the person who is being asked for help. There are many non-dog fans who condemn the reason precisely because the fear of such people is not an isolated case, but exists in our lives.

If the point of view is incorrect, please correct it.

…Update ...... at noon on December 10

It seems that there are extremists haunting, okay. I'd better post some words from the sages to speak in my place.

There is no injury, it is a benevolent technique, and the cow is not seen the sheep. A gentleman is also to beasts, seeing their life, and not being able to bear to see their death; Hearing its voice, I can't bear to eat its flesh. It is a gentleman who cooks far away.

Although I don't think these people can understand it. But you can go. Comical.

The original answer ......Don't copy, just report it.

He said a lot of words in the past, and the ultimate goal was to say that the dog was his own property and could be executed at will.

In order to whitewash the abuse and killing, pull the poor people as a shield, and ask the poor people if they are willing? If not, don't be so arrogant. Pharmacy Bilian.

In January 2018, the cover news exclusively reported the incident of "Falling to Death of a Puppy" that attracted strong social attention.

Although He Moumou, the dog smasher, had already cried in the police station and apologized to the dog owner Wu Moumou, Wu Moumou also said that he would also take legal means to protect his rights and interests. However, in this process, there were still many netizens, including Li and two female netizens, who disseminated private information such as the mobile phone number and home address of the dog wrestler He Moumou through Weibo and other online platforms. As a result, He Moumou's mobile phone received a large number of harassing and abusive text messages, and his normal life was seriously disrupted.

On March 28, the reporter learned from the Longquan Branch of the Chengdu Municipal Public Security Bureau that the dog wrestler He Moumou was sentenced to 7 days of administrative detention on March 27 for using the network to send threats and intimidating information to threaten the personal safety of others, and the dog owner Wu Moumou and three netizens were sentenced to administrative detention for 7 days in accordance with the law on March 27.

In the Longquanyi District Detention Center, Li, who was being interviewed, kept his head down. He never imagined that two months ago, a Weibo with just over 200 words would have such a big impact on his life. Li is a local information blogger in Chengdu with more than 100,000 followers on Weibo.

Although both of them claimed that they were "kind" and did "bad things", their actions also had an irreversible impact on the life of He Moumou, the party involved in the dog throwing incident. On the afternoon of March 28, the cover news reporter talked to two netizens who were administratively detained for using the Internet to disseminate other people's personal private information, and both said that they realized their mistakes and were willing to repent. (The following is based on the interview conversation).

Such acts are extremely cruel, irresponsible and immoral and must be punished. First of all, if the owner of a pet animal can no longer take care of it and wants to send it to another family, then it is reasonable to find a baby to be dismantled to an animal protection agency or to find a reliable adoptive family. Instead of taking extreme measures to fall to death pet animals.

As far as the question of whether it is suspected of violating the law, such behavior may be sanctioned by relevant laws. This is because almost all countries and regions have laws against animal cruelty.

I believe that we have to protect animals and treat them with love, especially those animals that need special care and protection. In short, such extreme cruelty should not be accepted by anyone with a conscience and a moral heart.