How is the 4th Debate Draft written? 4. What is the standard format of the defense draft?

The writing of the 4th debate is generally divided into two parts, rebuttal and summary sublimation. A rebuttal is a summary of the points of the full-time confrontation and a rebuttal based on that. Summarizing and sublimating is to summarize and raise the level of arguments for oneself.

Four debates, in a debate competition, the debater who makes the summary is responsible for summarizing the whole audience and making the last few minutes of a game concise and clear. In a debate match, the role of the debater who summarizes the game is to summarize the whole game and make the final minutes of the game concise and clear.

Fourth, the difference in the writing characteristics of the manuscript:

The argument of the first argument covered and affected the whole game, but due to the sufficient time, it will be refuted and attacked by the opponent throughout the game. Therefore, the argument of the first argument must be rigorous and simple, and there should not be too much controversy for the other party to speak. By the time the four debates were performing, the competition was already over, so all the people in the audience could not speak except for the four debates.

The scope of the arguments of the four arguments is relatively small, but it is also due to the time constraints, and any of your remarks will not be refuted by your opponent. Even if you speak first, it is impossible for the other party to explain things clearly in very short words.

The above content reference: Encyclopedia - Four Debates.

Format of the summary statement of the four debates in the debate competition:

Respected chairman, judges, opponents and audience friends, are here to say hello to everyone! Here, allow me to reiterate my views. After the wonderful debate just now, the opponent's debater talked eloquently, but please don't use your superb language skills and flowery rhetoric to mislead everyone, it is not difficult for us to find a few loopholes in the opponent's debate, please allow me to point them out one by one.

1. There is a constant emphasis on convenience. But ask the other side of the debate. With specific examples, it can be celebrity anecdotes, history, famous quotes, etc.

2. It is also mentioned for convenience, but it is not there.

3. The opponent's defense friend also put it. Take it out to talk about things, so did the opponent's defense friend clearly hear what we mentioned in the first defense (or second and third defenses). So.

4. I have been entangled in convenience. I don't know if the opponent's defense friend has heard of it. Thus. Isn't that my point of view?

5. We have been avoiding our proposal for convenience. (Question), I'll do it for you now.

6. The opponent's defense friend is always right. Vague concepts, stealing beams and changing pillars, is this really powerless to agree with our point of view?

Basic content: The four debate drafts are to list the arguments in four steps under a clear debate direction. From four perspectives, step by step, the debate is proved as a proof question. Finally, it is necessary to draw conclusions. To conform to the logical relationship, it can be exported.

Hello to the chairman, judges, opponents and students! It is a great pleasure to have this friendly debate match with the opposing side, and I would like to allow me to make my concluding remarks on behalf of the positive side.

First of all, let me elaborate further on my argument, I do not deny that the demands of the outside world have some effect on us, but it can only be used as a test of birth, and it does not ultimately determine our will, because a person, no matter where he is, can always hear his inner voice.

At the beginning of the argument, we gave a clear standard to the voice, "If there is a way in the world, it will appear, and if there is no way, it will be hidden", and the voice here refers to "the principles, beliefs and consciousness that are conducive to the requirements of social development, do not violate the moral bottom line, and reach a common relationship with the society."

At this time, we should give full play to our talents and actively join the WTO, and when the politics are dark and the people in society are struggling to make a living, a person should listen more to his inner voice and do things for the people at the lowest level, rather than climbing to a high position to act as a tiger and be ashamed of the people. ”

One. Learn about the debate tournamentTwo. General formatThree.

Debate classic quotesAt the end of the day, the four debaters are equivalent to the soul of the entire debate team and play a vital role, and there is no way to add to the debate tournament by simply relying on the pre-match memorization. It is difficult to get your own level of debate – to get higher and higher.

Do anything, love is the background, pursue your dreams, and constantly improve your ability is really charming.

Image source network, invasion and deletion).

With the end of the four debates, in fact, the debate of one side has ended. Therefore, the four debates actually play a crucial role in the debate arena. First of all, the four debates must summarize the format of the arena, repeat their own arguments, and systematically summarize the opponent's loopholes.

Synthesize our first, second and third arguments, complete a summary, and improve the theme; In the process of the opponent's second and third arguments and our second and third arguments, seek the negligence of the other party to better support our point of view.

First of all, there must be something or content that is the same as the previous debate. In this way, it will allow us to be coherent in the debate.

The four debates in the debate competition are the last person to speak, and the speeches of the four debates may play the role of the finishing touch.

How to write the manuscript of the four debates of the debate competition

1. The fourth debate is the last person to speak, and there will be no one to refute you after you, so you can rest assured that you can boldly say what you want to say. Free debate is the beginning of the appearance of the four debates, generally the first to start speaking should be the four debates, attacking the second and third debates as the spear and defending the first and fourth debates as the shield, the most important role of the four debates in the free debate is to make the views clear and stable, and never be led away to bring the views back.

At the end of the argument, he said with confidence. But don't bring up new ideas, it's important to follow the previous ones, because if there are new ideas that will disrupt the overall effect. The best position is to say that everyone is still most impressed by you, remember that the end is the best time for your theory, and the judges have the deepest impression of the end.

The opposing side can also use more time to attack the opponent's loopholes, and it is best not to emphasize their own points of view.

2. If you have your own summary of the four debates in advance, you will mainly summarize them according to their slips of the tongue and loopholes in their statements during the debate, in fact, it is very important for you to listen to the 2 3 debates as long as you are not nervous. 4. Defend the speech before the summary, expound our views, and expose them. Rebuttals, holes and mistakes of the previous opponent and points of view.

In fact, the 4 debates are the most difficult and the best to do. Anyone can sum up, the question is whether it is done well or not.

There is basically no controversy about this issue. It's all about the right degree.

Too much is easy to cause bad emotions and even life crises, and less is arrogant and complacent, which is called social garbage.

3. In the debate, the summary statement has always been a link that is not paid attention to, because the results are often finalized in the previous stage of free debate, so the summary statement is often memorized, the level of this summary statement is very low, it sounds like chicken ribs, a good summary statement, need to have structure and level, and integrate the pre-prepared arguments with the summary of the game on the field.

4.Summarize the meaning of the statement.

A debate match, especially when the two sides are evenly matched, a good closing statement can often seal the final victory. If the closing argument is just a mechanical retelling of one's own opinion, it will give a very bad impression to the judges. Under normal circumstances, there are not many opportunities for free debate and speech in the four debates, and only by making the summary statement flexibly can we fully demonstrate individual ability and not give people the impression that the team's ability is uneven.

The debate of the opponent's defense friend is really very exciting, but eloquence is better than the truth after all (the opponent's defense friend is really noisy and miscellaneous, big and small mistakes). The opposing defense friend has only seen the superficial phenomenon (·· And did not see the essence (·· The other side has been confusing what with what; The other party has been secretly changing concepts to generalize; The other party has been misunderstood... meaning; The other party has always avoided talking about anything, and has repeatedly avoided the question of my visit...

The other party has the following mistakes:

First, ·· You can guess their mistakes in advance and think about how to refute them)

Second, ·· Thirdly, ·· During the debate, work with your teammates to catch the loophole and write a note for you).

I will prove my point of view from the following points: (If you do not finish at the free debate stage or if there is something important that needs to be added, you can say it first).

First, ·· Second, ··

Third... So I insist...

Probably in this mode, you must communicate more with your teammates, properly emphasize the outstanding examples, strengthen their views, and then summarize the views and shock the audience.

Concluding remarks:

Attack the free debate stage (no matter which stage, if it is necessary and easy to counterattack, you can catch the loopholes that appear on the other side) (everyone needs to cooperate here, and other people can find loopholes through a small note to the hands of the four debaters);

Make up for your own mistakes (because the time is up, the points that have not been finished in one, two, or three arguments can be supplemented at this time);

Finally, reiterate my own point of view (corresponding to the foothold proposed by the first argument, it is better to add a little personal example and novelty).

In short, the role of the four debates is to check and fill in the gaps, deepen the theme, and shock the audience.

The fourth debate is the last person to speak, and there is no one to refute after that, so you can rest assured and boldly say whatever you want. The task of the four debates is mainly to summarize the arguments, which is not only another statement and summary of the views of the other side, but also a final sublimation and eye-catching.

1。When a person has not experienced anything, it is said that "gods and horses are all floating clouds". It's just parroting, it doesn't make any sense, there's no negativity to speak of.

2。When a person has experienced setbacks and has not yet stood up, it is said that "gods and horses are all floating clouds". How can you judge that she will not get back on her feet?

Don't say anything impossible. Regardless of personal wishes or not, people have always been pushed forward by Qiaoling's poor life, do you think that if you don't want to be calm, you won't be calm? You always have to come out calmly, no matter what you look like on the surface.

Just like our game, if you lose, you can only accept it, no matter how it looks now, looking back on this experience a few years later, saying "all gods and horses are floating clouds" is just a summary of reality, how is it negative?

3。When a person experiences success, it is said that "all gods and horses are floating clouds". Can you talk about negativity?

But do you think she's modest? Have you ever calmed down and thought that when you share the news of your success, it is long gone. The success of everything is just that moment.

You've already started a new journey from scratch. Isn't "all gods and horses are floating clouds" a true portrayal? Whether you admit it or not.

However, it is better not to deceive oneself, because facts are always just facts.

Summary: People, it doesn't matter if they are negative, they are just what she thinks she is. As long as there is no death, people are always calmly moving forward, just as time is always calmly turning to the next second, whether they recognize this reality or not.

When looking back on these, what is worth being negative or positive, accept the reality, "gods and horses are floating clouds", this is the meaning of calmness.