What are the answering skills of the line test 5, what are the answering skills of the line test

Hello, happy to answer your questions!

The answering skills of the line test are mainly used in the three aspects of quantitative relationship, graphical reasoning and data analysis, such as the problem of equal proportion and difference in quantitative relationship, axis symmetry, central symmetry in graphical reasoning, etc., and data analysis does not need to calculate the final answer to each question, or it is not a waste of time. When you encounter an answer that is accurate to several decimal places, as long as the alternative answer is not repeated, and there are 3 digits the same as your calculation, it can be determined. It is necessary to be familiar with the various forms of data carefully, and some can be directly selected.

The problem-solving skills in the practical test are based on a lot of practice and deep theory, and it is useless to detach from these skills.

The review of the test feels that there is not much improvement, it may be that the review method is wrong, and the candidates can choose a one-to-one Zhongzheng test campaign mode.

Through expert explanations, improve the efficiency of exam preparation and improve the effect of revision.

Hope it helps you solve your problem!

Line test: Buy a copy of the national examination test book of the Chinese public to review, and review it according to the national examination standards.

Go to the ape question bank to do the question, the analysis there is better, go through the book quickly, do the question after reading the book, you can do 1-2 sets a day, depending on your own time.

In general, there is no need to enroll in a tutorial class for the written exam.

The mantra for logical reasoning skills is as follows:1. Straightforward reasoning.

It's really annoying to judge bluntly, and it's like a fog and cloud to the phalanx.

Two must be false, and two must be true.

The diagonal relationship is contradictory, one false and the other true.

If you encounter the truth and falsehood in the question, the first thing to see if there is a contradiction.

The dialogue between the three is true or false, and the truth and falsehood must be in the contradiction.

Bypass the contradiction and push the reason, and the true and false relationship between the brother and the brother will naturally be divided.

The dialogue between the four people is true and false, and there is a truth in the contradiction.

There is no contradiction in the remaining two sentences, assuming that the true and false are substituted.

2. Compound judgment.

It is easy to judge the joint words, and the truth is really not to forget.

It is difficult to grasp the judgment of the choice of words, and there is one that is true.

Every part is false, and the compatible choice is false.

Reasoning is only possible by denying a limb, and affirming that a limb is meaningless.

If the sufficient conditions are false, the first true and the latter false are the only ones.

It is the rule to be willing before and after that, and to pay attention to it before not.

3. Negative propositional reasoning.

There is no precedent in the proposition, and you should pay attention when reasoning.

It's not all negative, it's not the same as before.

And or exchange with each other, and some of the reeds will also be replaced.

There is also possibility and inevitability, and the exchange of the two should not be forgotten.

Right and wrong must also be turned, and the two propositions are equivalent.

Fourth, the logic of argumentation.

It is not difficult to argue the logic, and the structural model needs to be clear.

Whether it is strengthened or weakened, the argument is the key.

Causal arguments are important, and causal inversions are often presented.

Whether there is other cause or not, the frequency is also high, and there is a cause and no effect to weaken the obvious.

No cause and no effect is reinforcement, and no cause and effect refute the argument.

If the proposal is put forward in the question, the argument for the measure is obvious.

Whether the method works and achieves the goal is the key.

If there is data in the question stem, statistical argumentation is the test point.

Whether the sample is representative or not is often generalized.

If there is a percentage in the question, beware of several traps in the data.

The total amount of the base number is often reminded, and it is relatively absolute to be able to distinguish.

If there are two comparisons in the question, the comparative experiment is the test point.

The two can only be compared with the same, but the difference between the two weakens the present.

There are also analogical argument questions, and analogy similarity is the key.

The structure is relatively simple, and the answer to the form is clear.

Answering skills for the line test: time bipartite method, ant late age order answering method, resolute abandonment method, confident order method, and scoring order method.

1. Time dichotomy.

In the first 60 minutes, students will answer questions in order: common sense judgment, verbal comprehension and expression, and judgment and reasoning. In the last 60 minutes, the answers will be answered: data analysis and quantitative relationships. This method has been trained with 3 to 5 sets of real questions, and most of them can get immediate results.

2. Sequential answers.

According to the order in which the questions are written, the answers will be made in order. This method requires a lot of training in real questions, and the average response time for each question type can be easily dealt with, regardless of the order of the questions in the test paper.

3. Resolutely abandon the law.

Give up a certain type of question and focus on a few others. In layman's terms, this method is to concentrate superior forces on the type of questions that are easy to score.

4. Confident sequential method.

Finish the questions that you are confident in first, and then answer the parts that you are not good at.

5. The method of scoring the order.

Answer the parts that are relatively easy to get points for first, and then answer the more difficult parts. That is, answer time-saving and easy questions such as data analysis, common sense judgment, word choice and fill-in-the-blank, analogical reasoning, and graphic judgment first, and then answer the rest of the questions.

Answering skills for the line test: first do the word choice fill-in-the-blank and fragment reading questions for verbal comprehension; Then do graphical reasoning, analogical reasoning, definition judgment, and logical judgment questions for judgment reasoning; Then do the data analysis questions; Finally, do the quantitative relationship problem.

The test questions are divided into five specializations: general knowledge judgment, verbal comprehension, quantitative relationship, judgment and reasoning, and data analysis.

General knowledge tests the ability to apply basic knowledge, speech tests the ability to think and communicate in language and writing, quantitative tests the ability to solve quantitative relationship problems, judgment and reasoning tests analyze and reason ability, and data analysis tests the ability to comprehensively understand and act or analyze and process.

Common sense judgment mainly tests the basic knowledge that candidates should know and the basic ability to use these rulers or knowledge to analyze and judge, focusing on the understanding of national conditions and social conditions, the basic quality of comprehensive management, etc., involving politics, economy, law, history, culture, geography, environment, nature, science and technology, etc.