The property company is flying and domineering, and there are many conflicts with the owner, should

Some owners have a big conflict with the property, and some owners feel that they pay money to the property, but the property does not serve well, but makes it difficult for them everywhere. Although there are many conflicts between the property and the owner, I think the property should not be banned.

1. The banning of the property will cause great trouble to the life of the owner in the future. The community where our home is located is because some people do not pay property fees, and the property fees cannot be collected, resulting in the property not making a profit, so many properties have been run. After the property ran away, our community really got into a lot of trouble.

For example, no one collects water bills, and when no one collects water bills, the water supply to the upper floors of the community is stopped. Many people are there when they see the water outage, and they know that there are benefits of property.

There are many problems with the elevator when there is no property, when the elevator has problems, because there is no qualification, and it is not possible to contact people outside to come to repair, so many people have to take the stairs.

Second, the ban on property will cause hidden dangers to the safety of the community. There are still certain advantages to the existence of the property, such as the property can stand at the door to check the guard, and do not let some unrelated personnel enter the community. If you don't have a property, someone else's car can be parked in your neighborhood.

If you don't have a property, thieves can swagger into your neighborhood. If there is no property, who do you go to call for help when there is a safety hazard in the elevator? If you don't have a property, who will clean your community?

Third, the ban on property will lead to a mess of the environment in the community. Although the closure of property can save us some money in our pockets, our quality of life will plummet。When you go back to the community every day, do you feel good when you see a lump of garbage on the ground?

Every day when you go back to the community, do you feel good when you see someone spitting and defecating in the elevator? When you go back to the community every day, you see those messy environments, can you feel good?

It shouldn't be banned. If the property is banned, then the neighborhood will become very chaotic. There will be a certain amount of chaos in management.

In our lives, many people say that the property company is flying, not only with the owner of the contradictions, but only take money and do nothing, should ban the property, but I think that the property can not be banned, you must know that if there is no property, the community we live in will be a piece of garbage, no one to clean up, life will become very chaotic.

No, because although there are various problems in the property, it also brings a lot of convenience to the residents of the community.

There is no profit in the property, and it is imperative to ban the property!

A property built for the entire owner.

First of all, is there any liability for the property? Yes: You have to take it well. No: You have to be patient and persuasive, you can unite with the neighborhood committee and let the volunteers in the community blame it! Make him feel bad about himself.

First, the good-neighborly relationship of the community, may be the owner of the long-term self-discipline caused by other owners have a view of the promising, do the owner's ideological work to tell him that the environmental construction of the community needs everyone's support and cooperation, if each other is easy to produce a vicious circle, is not good for everyone.

Second, if the owner barbecues on the ground and affects the top, if the top also throws garbage from the top, let him know that he understands each other.

3. Tell the owner that there is no point in arguing and not solving the problem, that the construction of the community environment and the coordination of relations require the joint efforts of everyone, and that the management of the property is promoted, and if the other party does not pay attention to personal words and deeds, or has destructive behavior, it will be held responsible.

1.The flowers are uprooted, are the flowers planted by the owner planted in the public greenery? Is it approved by the Owners' Committee and the property?

In addition, according to the newly promulgated property law, as long as the property management company proves that all matters have been done in accordance with the contract, the property management company has no liability.

2.Conflicts between neighbors, the property company can only coordinate, sometimes through the local housing office, the neighborhood committee to coordinate the work, we just need to do what we should do, after all, it is difficult to reconcile.

Only if you do a good job of coordination, if you behave badly, you can call the chengguan to stop it.

Hello, the property company has deceived the owner of the inaction, as the owner, you can complain to the property section of the local Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau, so as to protect your own rights and interests.

According to Article 48 of the Property Management Regulations, the local people's real estate administrative departments at or above the county level shall promptly deal with complaints from owners, owners' committees, property users and property service enterprises in property management activities.

1. You can complain to the property management office of the local real estate management bureau, which is the competent department of the property industry;

2. Do the corresponding work before complaining. Try not to take the Wuzen method of verbal complaints, and try to submit them in writing;

3. Before submission, look at the property management agreement signed between you and the property management company, what are the places where the property company has not fulfilled its duties, and the evidence should be sufficient and complete.

The property owner rarely sues the owner, because there are subjective reasons why he does not want to completely deal with the owner, and there are also reasons why the property itself has problems with its work.

The service subject of the property is every owner of the community. Moreover, the property fee is charged every year, and the chain ruler property cannot sue the owner for property services every year. If you have a complete confrontation with the owner, then the work of the property is completely paralyzed.

In addition, the property company also understands that its job is not useless. Most of the problems complained about by the owners are also real, but the property can't solve them, so the vicious circle continues.

How property management disputes are handled

Mediation of civil disputes over property management includes civil mediation and administrative mediation. Civil mediation is jointly selected by the parties to the dispute, and a third party proposes a settlement opinion based on the opinions and authorization of both parties, and the dispute is resolved by the consent of both parties. However, this form of conciliation has no legal effect.

After the mediation, if one of the parties refuses to implement the agreed matters, the dispute will remain unresolved.

The administrative mediation of property management disputes is mediated with the help of the power of the supervisor, but if one party does not comply with the implementation, it must be resolved by other means.

Civil mediation and administrative mediation are different from mediation in arbitration or litigation proceedings. Mediation in arbitration or litigation is an integral part of the arbitration process and is not independent.

Analysis of legal troubles:

According to the relevant laws and regulations, the owner must change the property management company to protect his rights, and if the property management company performs its obligations in strict accordance with the property service contract, then it can collect relevant evidence to respond to the lawsuit. If the property management company fails to provide property services as agreed, then the owners can file a joint lawsuit.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Article 946 Where the owners jointly decide to dismiss the property management service provider in accordance with legal procedures, the property management service contract may be terminated. If a decision is made to dismiss the employee, the property service provider shall be notified in writing 60 days in advance, except where the notice period is otherwise agreed in the contract.

If the termination of the contract in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph causes losses to the property service provider, the owner shall compensate for the losses except for reasons attributable to the owner.