Do you think state owned enterprises are necessarily better than private enterprises?

State-owned enterprises have the benefits of state-owned enterprises, and private enterprises also have the advantages of private enterprises, depending on the individual's ideas. At present, the work of state-owned enterprises is relatively stable, but it is generally a radish and a pit, if you want to be promoted or how much development you have, you have to wait for the hole above you to be empty, you can fill it, and you have to be a person in the case of a relationship. Private enterprises are generally different, private enterprises look at your personal ability, you can bring profits to the company, then you are the master, can not estimate or simply directly lead to problems, you can just get out.

In short, if you want to have a stable work life, it is appropriate to choose a state-owned enterprise. But if you want to work hard and earn more Mane, you can consider going to the private sector, but it also depends on the specific job.

Personally, I think it's still a state-owned enterprise! Welfare is guaranteed! Maybe I didn't make a lot of money at the time!

However, it is definitely better than the private sector after retirement! Still have to plan for the future! Take teachers, for example!

I used to be a teacher in a private school, and I didn't have much money! The headmaster position is in its own interests! Of course, it is also individual!

But that's basically the case with all private business owners! Deduction of wages! There's no insurance or anything like that!

I can't even say anything about retirement! But the state-run ones are different! Maybe less money to start with!

But it will increase with the length of service! There are five insurances! Pensions are also available!

And no less! So, let me choose! Or a state-owned enterprise!

I have worked in state-owned enterprises and private enterprises for many years, and my own personal imitation will better illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of both. The owner of a state-owned enterprise is the state, but who represents the state? It is the top manager of a state-owned enterprise, but the fundamental interests of this manager are not linked to the interests of the enterprise (for example, if the enterprise goes bankrupt, he will not go bankrupt, and the development of the enterprise will not benefit synchronously), and behind the top manager of the enterprise, there is a competent department that can control his fate, which contains a lot of interpersonal relationships.

No matter how good he does a big thing, it is pure and possible to let him walk with a piece of paper, no matter how bad he does, someone will still be "covered" by him.

This is the existing mechanism of state-owned enterprises, to put it bluntly, the owner of state-owned enterprises "country" is a virtual subject, is he + you + me, so no one will rack their brains for the interests of the enterprise, the best management is just a profit under the feeling of hello, I am good, everyone is good, if you go carefully to observe, compared with peers, almost all state-owned enterprises labor productivity.

are far lower than private companies.

But state-owned enterprises are welcome for most people, because the work in state-owned enterprises is relatively easy, there is little pressure on economic indicators and working hours, even if there is a loss at the end of the year, there is also a subsidy to be responsible, and you will not lose a penny of your own money, as long as you are consistent with the "thoughts" of the superior leaders, there will generally not be anything "fired".

and so on.

There is a sharp difference between private enterprises and state-owned enterprises, because the main body of private enterprises is very clear, the purpose of the business boss is to make money, and all employees of the enterprise must strive for a very clear goal of "profit", so the employment policy of private enterprises is different from that of state-owned enterprises.

Therefore, generally speaking, the economic pressure of people in private enterprises is much greater than that of state-owned enterprises, and the ability of private enterprises to resist risks is much smaller than that of state-owned enterprises, and the risks of enterprises will be more distributed to each employee, and this pressure will be transformed into motivation to a certain extent, so the degree of stimulation of labor productivity in private enterprises will be higher (many production workers in private enterprises implement piecework wage system, if you do well in private enterprises, it is easier to get high remuneration, and the wage and personnel systems of private enterprises are generally much more flexible than those of state-owned enterprises.)

I think state-owned enterprises are better, because the work of state-owned enterprises is relatively stable, the salary is also very good, and then there are five insurances and one housing fund.

I think state-owned enterprises are better, because the work of state-owned enterprises is relatively stable, and the benefits are very good.

State-owned enterprises are better, the wages will be higher, and their jobs will be less, and there will be a lot of benefits.

It can only be said that on the whole, state-owned enterprises are better, but it does not mean that every state-owned enterprise is better than private enterprises!

State-owned enterprises refer to wholly state-owned enterprises, wholly state-owned companies and state-owned capital holding companies that perform the duties of investors on behalf of the state and local people, including enterprises at the same level and enterprises formed by investment at the same level and their level by level supervised by local state-owned assets supervision and administration institutions and other departments.

A private enterprise refers to a for-profit economic organization invested and established by a natural person or controlled by a natural person and based on wage labor. Including private limited liability companies, private shares, private partnerships and private sole proprietorship enterprises registered in accordance with the provisions of the Company Law, the Partnership Enterprise Law and the Interim Regulations on Private Enterprises.

Not necessarily, no matter how strong your ability is in state-owned enterprises, as long as you can't climb up, you won't earn more than others, as long as you have the ability to private enterprises, whether you are a manager or not, you may earn more than them, which is why private enterprises are not allowed to inquire about wages privately, and they all say that state-owned enterprises are better treated than private enterprises, not necessarily, some better private enterprises are also treated very well, and they should have insurance.

And**. They are all given, but this kind of company is not easy to find, so you have to work harder.

Because state-owned enterprises can give dignity to people in all aspects. In general, I like the work of state-owned enterprises now, because I think there is still more humanistic care, which is more humane. At least there are not so strict requirements for leave and tardiness, and there is no mandatory overtime.

Five insurances and one housing fund or six insurances and two housing funds.

The five insurances and two housing funds refer to endowment insurance, medical insurance, unemployment insurance, work-related injury insurance, maternity insurance, and housing provident fund.

The six insurances and two funds are extra plus: supplementary endowment insurance (can also be used as supplementary medical insurance) and enterprise annuity.

Some state-owned enterprises will also buy commercial insurance for their employees, and they will also insure you if they fall on the way to work.

Private enterprises may not pay social security, may only pay for the three insurances (pension, medical care, unemployment), and there are not many people who can pay five insurances and one housing fund, let alone six insurances and two housing funds. State-owned enterprises strictly implement the relevant national regulations in the six insurances and two funds, and the upper limit will generally be taken in the proportion of handover, or even the highest proportion, and private enterprises are likely to pay according to the minimum standard.

Some people may feel that they pay less wages and are unwilling to pay, but in my opinion, this belongs to drinking water to quench thirst. The most important of the five insurances and one housing fund should be the housing provident fund, followed by medical insurance, and the pension insurance is very important from a long-term perspective. The provident fund can be used to buy a house, pretend to be imitated and repaired, and some people can even use the provident fund to repay the loan.

Medical insurance is for medical treatment, who doesn't have a headache and brain fever these days?

I think there are advantages and disadvantages for both state-owned enterprises and private enterprises, and it depends on different factors, such as industry, management, policies, etc. Here are some common sentiments:

Advantages of state-owned enterprises:

2.Social responsibility: SOEs typically have a higher sense of social responsibility, including concern for employees, the environment, and society.

3.Technological advantages: Some SOEs have a high level of technology and R&D, and have a monopoly position in important areas, such as oil and gas.

Advantages of the private sector:

1.Innovativeness: Private companies are generally more agile and quick to adapt to market changes, making it easier to innovate and experiment with new ideas.

2.Efficiency: Private companies tend to focus more on efficiency and cost control, making it easier to achieve performance growth and profit maximization.

3.Competitive Initiative: Private companies typically face greater competition and therefore focus more on market share and brand value.

In general, state-owned enterprises and private enterprises have their own advantages and disadvantages, and which type of enterprise is better for a specific industry and market will depend on a variety of factors.

1. From the perspective of overtime.

While overtime takes time and effort, it's very different in nature. Many state-owned enterprises work overtime to meet the inspection of superiors, and the suddenness is relatively strong; Private companies work overtime more for business, and there is really no comparison. In state-owned enterprises, you do a lot of work, you have strong ability, and the more unlucky things will be thrown at you, and the interests have nothing to do with you.

No matter which state-owned enterprise it is, 1 3 is working, and the rest are sitting on empty salaries, so the work will not be done. Does the private sector dare to play like this, and can it afford it?

2. In terms of time.

The private sector is the most relaxed, usually going to work at 10 a.m. and going home after 4 p.m. State-owned enterprises, in accordance with the provisions of the "Labor Law", are 8 in the morning and 6 in the evening, and they have to clock in and out on time, and they can't leave until they are not. If the leader doesn't leave, you won't be a friend, so I'm embarrassed to go.

3. In terms of welfare and competition.

Welfare is the most important thing for every employee. A lot of people work for this tael of silver. In a state-owned enterprise, as long as you sign a labor contract, the normal five insurances and one housing fund, and holiday benefits will be guaranteed to some extent.

If you don't make big mistakes, you'll basically be able to mix up until retirement. In the past, this kind of old life pattern made many people hate it. But now, more than ever, this stability is popular with job seekers.

And what about the private sector? Layoffs are untimely, there is no security after the age of 35, and many people say that there is a midlife crisis, but in fact it is also because of the employment panic caused by too many layoffs in private companies. As for insurance or something, some companies don't have it at all, and the bonus should be linked to the company's efficiency, and the boss said that it was gone, and it was gone.

Therefore, many state-owned enterprises are becoming more and more involuted, some people complain about more and more overtime, and some often stay up all night, and there is a chance to stay up all night every week, which is much more than some private enterprises, which is really incredible.

State-owned enterprises win in stability, but the development prospects are long, and private enterprises win in high wages.