Alibaba was fined 18.28 billion yuan, what is the impact of anti monopoly on corporate competition?

Anti-monopoly can keep the market in a healthy and balanced state, and enterprises can compete more fairly and impartially, so as to safeguard the interests of consumers and promote the healthy development of society.

Anti-monopoly can promote the healthy development of the market, create a benign competitive environment, and make the competition between entrepreneurs more fair and just.

Alibaba was fined 100 million yuan, and anti-monopoly has a very big impact on enterprise competition, but for Alibaba, although it has been fined so much money, the impact on him will not be great. Reduced earnings are inevitable.

It can have a big impact on their money chain. Lose some of their hole cards to their competition. Increase the difficulty.

1. Monopoly raises costs and reduces competitiveness. On the one hand, monopoly enterprises can obtain excess profits through monopoly, which hinders the improvement of efficiency, hinders their enthusiasm to expand business scale, and inhibits innovation to a certain extent. 2. The essence of anti-monopoly is to regulate anti-competitive behavior, and its existence can enable continuous healthy competition between enterprises, presume the continuous development and progress of all walks of life, and itself is conducive to the overall interests of society.

What the State has done in this regard has given our civilian population a guarantee of security.

Antitrust will turn corporate competition into a healthy competition. It is a kind of competition at the technical level and service level, rather than competition at the capital level. It is getting better and better for small and medium-sized enterprises, and it is getting more and more difficult for monopoly giants.

Anti-monopoly has a very great impact on enterprise competition, which will make the competition between enterprises benign rather than vicious, and will make the competition between enterprises more intense.

It is not conducive to the competition between social enterprises, and at the same time, the interests of the people are not guaranteed to a certain extent, which has caused some bad atmosphere in the society.

Because it would cause one store to monopolize it, and it would be unfair to other people, and it would be very panicked for us, so I think it's a very bad thing.

First of all, horizontal monopoly agreements affect the company's ability to restrict and eliminate competitiveness. Horizontal monopoly agreements are more harmful than vertical monopoly agreements. As a result, most administrative law enforcement agencies and judicial authorities have adopted strict principles of violating the law, such as the case of the Fengcheng Ready Mixed Concrete Association and its member companies.

Instead of further analyzing the effects of eliminating or restricting competition, the administrative law enforcement authorities have determined the formal requirements for relevant entities to implement pricing, limit the number of goods, divide sales markets, and boycott. Transactions between the association and member companies, horizontal monopoly agreements.

Second, the act of entering into and executing a monopoly agreement with a counterparty in a transaction has a great impact on the company's transactions. There are no other penalties and the company's operations will not be affected. In terms of performance, the company did not affect dealer shipments**, so it will not cause a decline in revenue.

According to the regulations, the company cannot stipulate the external sales of dealers. It is up to the dealer to decide whether the other party will sell the product below the cost to increase sales. Monopoly fines are not directly related to ** transactions, and are normal investment risks.

Second, a concentration of undertakings that has not been declared and implemented in accordance with the law does not have the effect of eliminating or restricting competition. According to the Anti-Monopoly Law, the treatment includes reinstatement of the pre-concentration status and a fine of less than 500,000 yuan. Returning to the state before concentration will have a greater impact on the development of enterprises and economic operations.

Judging from the illegal implementation of centralized law enforcement in China and the experience of overseas law enforcement, it is generally only applicable when the transaction has the effect of eliminating or restricting competition. After investigation, none of these three cases had the effect of eliminating or restricting competition.

It should be known that a horizontal monopoly agreement is an agreement between competing operators on fixing, limiting the number of goods, dividing the market, etc. The delivery of property between the subjects of a horizontal monopoly agreement is relatively rare. In the other four cases of abuse of market dominance, the main reason for one party's claim for continued performance of the contract was that the other party had not performed the contract and the delivery of the property had not been performed or had not been fully performed.

All parties to a horizontal monopoly agreement have a subjective will to enter into a monopoly agreement.

The punishment of these large enterprises will definitely have a certain impact, at least they will no longer dare to use monopolies when expanding their business in the future, so their business competition will become more intense, and they will not be as dominant as before.

It will affect the interests of the company, and it will also affect the company's reputation, and it will affect the company's development. It can lead to the value of the company being affected, and it can also lead to the company being boycotted by other industries.

This incident will also have a certain impact on the company's operation, after all, these companies are involved in monopoly, will be punished by the market department, the impact of this incident is also very bad, may affect the image of these companies in the minds of consumers, will also affect the subsequent development.

With the deepening of the normalization of anti-monopoly supervision, enterprises have continuously improved their awareness of the declaration of concentration of undertakings, actively self-examined historical transactions, actively reported suspected failure to declare in accordance with the law, and actively cooperated with the investigation. The State Administration for Market Regulation resolutely implements the decision-making and deployment of enterprises and fully supports the development of enterprises, and is speeding up the completion of the clean-up of existing cases in accordance with the law, helping enterprises to travel lightly and promoting the sustainable and healthy development of enterprises and industries.

Monopolistic behavior like Alibaba's may create an imbalance in a market, where only one company dominates the market and lacks the corresponding competitiveness, which is very unfair to other companies.

I think that this will cause us to stay in other industries, so I think it makes a very bad impression on us, so I think we should be punished because it can reassure everyone's heart.

First, it may cause other players in the industry to have no way to develop, second, he may make Alibaba a giant organization out of the control of the state, third, there is no good choice and comparison for the people, fourth, he may let our now developed mobile phone industry go downhill, and fifth, it may trigger vicious competition in the industry.

Monopoly is very detrimental to the development of this social market, and it cannot guarantee the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, and is not conducive to healthy competition between markets.

Monopoly will affect the entire market order, and it will also have a very big blow to some other small enterprises.

It is very immoral to make other industries and enterprises unable to develop, and for these phenomena in society, it is necessary to let a hundred flowers bloom to look good.