Is it a good thing for leaders to be too united with their subordinate employees?

I think it's a good thing that the subordinate employees are too united, which shows that there is cohesion between them, so they are also very motivated to work in the future.

Answer: It is not a good thing for subordinate employees to be too united, which will make subordinate employees lack competitiveness among themselves, which is not conducive to the development of the company.

It's a good thing, because their unity will make their work more efficient and the company's interests better.

It's a good thing, because if the leaders and employees are very united, it will create a lot of company performance.

It's not a good thing, if the subordinate employees are too united, there may be a collective departure from the company, which is even more difficult to manage, and everyone will rebel against themselves.

I think it's not a good thing for leaders to be too united with their subordinates, because when there is a conflict between employees and leaders, employees will not let the leader go.

It's not a good thing, because sometimes the leader may do something wrong, which will cause all the members to rebel together.

It should be regarded as a good thing, because after all, the unity of their employees means that the company is cohesive, which is a good thing for leaders.

Not a good thing. It's very problematic to manage that, and it may rise up en masse against some of your claims.

This is not a good thing, because the most important thing in a company is to check and balance each other's subordinates, and employees who are too united is a threat to the leader.

It's not a good thing, after all, if these subordinates don't like you, then these subordinates may be difficult to manage, and it is not good for this leader.

If I say it, I will isolate it directly, I don't want this person at all, generally speaking, if it is a black sheep, it will naturally not be able to stay. But there is also a possibility that if you are really very powerful, you will also seem to have a bad relationship, and you can get productivity and not offend other people.

In fact, the leader generally does not deal with the relationship between employees, he only cares whether the interests generated between the two conflict with him, and if there is a conflict, he will talk to them face-to-face.

The best thing to do is to find the most disobedient one and fire him to make an example.

If the subordinates are united, the orders of the leader will be taken lightly. The reason is very simple: the screw caps can be taken one by one, but the screw caps are melted into a piece of iron, and it is not easy to take them.

If one of the subordinates overpowers everyone else, that person will challenge your authority, and those under his influence will also despise the leader.

But if you can provoke your subordinates to fight, the situation is different.

Keep their fights in a win-loser, don't let them divide the odds, then your attitude will play a decisive role. They will all want your support.

The slightest show of care you will give them a runny nose.

If someone in your subordinates challenges your authority, OK, pick one of the others to support the confrontation instead of getting yourself involved in the fight.

Even if he wants to challenge you, someone will hold him back.

Everything is relative, just a matter of balance, if the accountant and the cashier are husband and wife, then the front of the enterprise is not his family, if the accountant and the leader are enemies, then how to deal with some problems, understand.

Very simply, the reason why leaders hire employees is that they will always be on a front with themselves, their interests are supreme, and they can be controlled at any time, and the reason why they don't want to see middle-level subordinates too united should be becauseIf the staff is too united, it will be difficult to manage, and the second should be yesTwo fronts were formed, the whole will become the opposite of each other.

First of all, a collective unity is the top priority, mutual cooperation with each other, often make the whole collective get more benefits, create more interest space for each other, over time, it will form a cycle, the more united the collective, the more outstanding the value of interests, for the boss, the employees are too united, it will form a situation where officials protect each other, and the senior management will not understand the true situation of the collective.

The second is that employees are too united, may form two fronts, each employee is too self-interested, the upper level does not understand the specific situation, so it may lead to the formation of two opposites up and down the company, over time, it will lead to the loss of the company's collective interests, of course, some leaders in the workplace do not want to see unity in this sense, after all, this unity will affect the interests of the company.

In fact, it is more beneficial to the company that the company's employees are too united, as long as it does not threaten the interests of the company as a whole, the company can still achieve a long-term peace and stability situation. At present, the market is not saturated, and the employment opportunities are not very sufficient, as long as you get a satisfactory job, you will pay special attention to this kind of opportunity, so you will definitely actively integrate into the group and create great benefits for the company. I hope that the company's leaders can create good job opportunities and workspaces for employees.

If the middle subordinates are too united, it may have a negative impact on their position and create a passive situation.

Because if it is too united, it is not very beneficial to the company, and if the company makes some decisions that are not appropriate, they will oppose it.

In the workplace, employees are too united, which can create a passive pattern for the company or the leader.

I think that if the middle subordinates are too united, it will endanger the interests of some leaders.

Because the unity of subordinates can lead to some damage to the interests of leaders in the workplace.

Because I was afraid that they would form an alliance and rebel together, I was afraid that they would do something bad for the unit.

Because I'm annoying and unpleasant, I compare myself to myself...

If you are too united, it may be bad for you, there will be problems, and the employees may not be like you.

Because if the middle and lower levels are too united, it will threaten the leadership position of some leaders, which the leaders are very unhappy with.

In the workplace, we often hear many people complain that their bosses are unreasonable, they can't understand their subordinates, in short, as long as they turn on the chatter completely, they can't stop. It's as if every problem is your boss's fault and you won't make any mistakes. Yesterday, a colleague chatted.

He said his department had too much work to do lately. He was criticized by the leaders of other departments in his work report in the afternoon. Under the reign of his first bench, there was no presence, let alone honor.

Then I asked him to explain the whole story. I've found that some department leaders are very strict and able to stick to a certain issue, but the most critical problem is still within ourselves. It is said that in the workplace, the relationship between superiors and subordinates is very complicated.

In fact, if we grasp these three core issues, the relationship between them will be eased and they will be respected. The main reason for conflicts and conflicts between superiors and subordinates in the workplace is that employees are dissatisfied with their work. The subordinates were very angry in the face of the accusations from their superiors, but they were powerless to refute them.

The reason for this conflict is the failure to put oneself in the shoes of others.

<> here are some things you might not like to hear, but should be warned. All tempers are a sign of incompetence unless they demonstrate their core values. Lose your temper with your colleagues, lose your temper with your boss, and stop working at the beginning.

Such an employee does not last long anywhere.

The reason why the boss is not satisfied with us is not because of you, but because the quality of your work and the lack of control over the content of your work, so the boss will be more strict with himself, fearing that he will end up with a "big hole". Therefore, the most effective way to alleviate the relationship with the leader is to keep them updated on the progress of their work.

Give him a sense of control, and when facing the boss, he can clearly explain the progress of your work and the effect of the completion, otherwise the subordinate relationship will only fall into a vicious circle. In the workplace, there are not a few people who slip through the wall after seeing their bosses. Fear of communicating with your boss, and sometimes even unable to keep up with your boss's train of thought.

So in the process of every communication, there is always a situation of passive input. What kind of employees does the boss like, not the kind of employees who are particularly obedient, but subordinates who have their own ideas and can help them solve problems. Jujube Brigade.

Because sooner or later, the leader will see his true face, and those who have no ability will not be valued by others.

Because the leader is also a smart person, they know which employees in the company are slow to work hard, and which employees only know that they are lazy, and the employees who have been unable to do anything in the company, the leader will not let him stay.

Answer: Which leaders of the staff are certainly not very good at what they do, and they only know flattery, and they are slow at work, and if these people stay in the company for a long time, they can only pull the company back from the company.

Because these employees are not capable at all, and their minds are not pure, they can only pat on the back, and everyone is more disgusted after a long time.

First, divide and conquer, and break them one by one.

The subordinates are very capable, but also very temperamental, when they are together, on the one hand, they can do a very good job, very results, but on the other hand, they often put forward conditions to the leader, ask for benefits, disobey discipline, what should I do? The open and fair approach is to divide and conquer, break them one by one, first transfer them to different departments, and then disintegrate them one by one, either to give promises, or to give punishments, or to give praise, or to give rewards, in short, there are many ways, in order to make these people who have the ability, but have the temper, no longer monolithic. As long as there is a disagreement within them, a lot of things are easier to do, and you will be able to manage people better.

Second, whether it's a friend or a competitor.

A lot of times, it's really not up to the individual to decide the game. As a simple example, Xiao Zhang and Xiao Li are very capable of working, and they are in the same department, the two have similar family and educational backgrounds, so the relationship is very good, and the cooperation between the two is also very good, so the work performance of the department is also very fast, but the leaders sometimes consider that if they are too united, they may collude to deceive the leaders.

So put the two of them in the competitive department, at this time, even if their personal relationship is good, but at work, this natural contradiction between departments, will force them to continue to face to face and face to face, after a long time, there will inevitably be estrangement in their hearts, and they will not be so united.