Is Jiang Gan really stupid in history? Why?

Updated on history 2024-07-24
19 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    No, Jiang Gan in the official history.

    In fact, he is very capable, and he is not as useless and stupid as written in **. I believe that many people should have watched the TV series version of "Romance of the Three Kingdoms".

    In the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, there is a plot describing Jiang Gan stealing books, and Jiang Gan's actor in the TV series is a relatively thief-eyed person, who doesn't look like a good person, and is very stupid. may be because the director and screenwriter of the TV series feel that Jiang Gan should be such a character, so they chose such an actor, so that Jiang Gan's image is more like a villain. <>

    In the TV series, Liu Bei.

    Guan Yu and Zhang Fei's choices are very normal, they all look like decent characters, even Zhao Yun.

    Ma Chao, Zhou Yu, Zhuge Liang.

    's actors are normal, mainly because in the impression of many people, they will feel that these people are positive characters to highlight the role image of these characters. And in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Jiang Gan was portrayed as a very treacherous villain. But the real Jiang Gan in history is not as described in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, but a very upright person.

    Jiang Gan in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is not only very timid and confused, but also very stupid, and often does some stupid things. In fact, the real Jiang Gan in history was a famous man in Kyushu, and he was very bold and followed Cao Cao.

    During the southern expedition together, Jiang Gan was Cao Cao's staff. Cao Cao ordered Jiang Gan to persuade Zhou Yu to surrender, and after Jiang Gan received the order, he was vigorously welcomed by Zhou Yu as in the TV series, but Jiang Gan could see Zhou Yu's thoughts at a glance, and under Zhou Yu's careful guidance, Jiang Gan observed the entire Eastern Wu along the way.

    , and there is no such thing as Jiang Gan stealing books in history. <>

    The reason why Jiang Gan is portrayed so obscene in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is mainly to highlight Zhou Yu's character image, because Zhou Yu is a positive character in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, so other characters must serve the protagonist.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    Of course, he is not stupid in history, otherwise he would not have been reused so many times, and he must have some real skills. He's actually a relatively talented person.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    No, this is because this character in history is different from the characters in film and television works, so it is inconsistent with history.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Of course not. Because in the canonical history, he is very capable, he is a wise and foolish man.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    In the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, in order to show the drama of the Battle of Chibi, at this time, Jiang Ganmao recommended himself that he had an old relationship with Zhou Yu and wanted to go to Soochow to persuade Zhou Yu to surrender, isn't it just right?

    Moreover, Zhou Yu also invited Jiang Gan to sleep with him and talk about the friendship of his classmates, but Zhou Yu put the secretly forged letter aside from his sleep.

    Jiang Gan hurriedly brought this letter to Cao Cao, Cao Cao was shocked when he saw it, after all, it was a general who did not have so many feelings, so he immediately pushed them out and beheaded them, and after the beheading, Cao Cao suddenly felt that he had been tricked.

    This was Jiang Gan's first stupidity, and in the second time, Jiang Gan felt very shameless because he didn't succeed in the previous time, so he asked Cao Cao again for instructions and went to Soochow to persuade Zhou Yu.

    Pang Tong came up with a fire battle to death strategy for Cao Cao, a chain plan.

    This is the Jiang Gan described in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, it can be said how stupid and stupid he is, and he has been used as a gunman many times.

    But in fact, Jiang Gan in history is a celebrity and a famous debater, he did go to persuade Zhou Yu to surrender, but it was not so unbearable, but very high, after finding that Zhou Yu could not say that he would surrender, it would not be difficult for others, he smiled and said nothing, and went back to reply that Zhou Yu could not be persuaded to surrender, and that's it, since then there is no trace of him, this is chic.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Jiang Gan in history is not as stupid as in Romance, he is a person with both talent and appearance, otherwise he would not have been sent by Cao Cao to be a lobbyist to persuade Zhou Yu to take refuge in himself.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    In "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", Jiang Gan was really hacked, he crossed the river twice, and was cheated twice, and Jiang Gan in the official history was a very smart person, and he was not killed by Zhang Fei, in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, the author deliberately scandalized Zhuge Liang and Zhou Yu in order to elevate Zhuge Liang and Zhou Yu.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    In fact, it is not as stupid as in the romance, it is just an exaggerated propaganda for later generations.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    In fact, he is not as stupid as he acted in the TV series, he was scandalized in the TV series, in fact, he is quite talented in history.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    No, "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" was written by Luo Guanzhong based on "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", Jiang Gan is actually a very capable person, just like Zhou Yu is not a stingy person, Jiang Gan is not useless, just a change made for the needs of the plot.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    No, Jiang Gan sent Zhou Yu at that time because Cao Cao affirmed Jiang Gan's eloquence and took the initiative to order him to go, Jiang Gan in history was calm and calm after seeing Zhou Yu, and Jiang Gan in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms had no grace, and Jiang Gan stole books, there is no such plot in the official history. Therefore, Jiang Gan in the official history is not stupid.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    No, Jiang Gan in the official history is a very smart person, and he was not killed by Zhang Fei, in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, the author deliberately scandalized Zhuge Liang and Zhou Yu in order to elevate him.

  13. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    In fact, Jiang Gan in the official history is very smart, not as stupid as ** wrote, but the author deliberately scandalized Zhuge Liang and Zhou Yu in order to beautify him.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    No, in the official history, he was just a debater, and he went to Jiangdong to persuade Zhou Yu to surrender before he came back. There are no plots like those in "Romance of the Three Kingdoms".

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    It shouldn't be, because the settings of many characters in "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" are exaggerated or fictional, and the records of Jiang Gan in the history books are not as easy to be fooled as in film and television dramas.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Jiang Gan is a very smart person, and he was not killed by Zhang Fei, and the author in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms deliberately scandalized Zhuge Liang and Zhou Yu in order to elevate him.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Jiang Gan in the official history is not as imported as in "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", because he was appointed because he also has a certain talent and eloquence, and Jiang Gan's low image is to highlight the positive characters.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    In order to elevate Zhuge Liang and Zhou Yu and cater to their deeds, he was deliberately scandalized, so that there would be a contrast.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Probably not. The story ** is not a fact after all, and we don't know what the facts are, but Jiang Gan will not be so stupid and cute as Cao Cao's strategist.

Related questions
14 answers2024-07-24

I don't know because history is always in the hands of the victors, and the victors can write history however they want.

5 answers2024-07-24

The Yang family will really exist in history, to say that the image of existence in my mind, it is definitely a kind of embodiment of loyalty, we all know that the Yang family will be in history to defend the Great Song Dynasty against the invasion of the Khitan people of the Liao State, it can be said that the Yang family for the Great Song Dynasty to die of all their might, the last bullet was gone, and they failed to save the Great Song Dynasty, it can only be said that it is a heroic tragedy, but the spirit of the Yang family will always accompany us. Passed on. >>>More

20 answers2024-07-24

It's not in history, but in fact, it can't give Su Peisheng a handful of golden melon seeds. Because it's not installed, it's just a small flying screen in the harem, and it actually doesn't have so much wealth.

13 answers2024-07-24

There is no such person as Xia Yuhe in history, it is just made up in film and television dramas, and Qianlong's favorite woman should be his queen Fucha.

3 answers2024-07-24

No. This plot originally came from the "Three Things of Guo Chong" quoted by Pei Songzhi in the biography of Zhuge Liang in the "Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms", but Pei Songzhi immediately argued it after the quotation, believing that this was a fictitious thing. Because when Zhuge Liang "came out of Qishan", Sima Yishang was the governor of Jingzhou and stationed in Wancheng. >>>More