Is there a lost branch of TCM that has the same theory as Western medicine?

Traditional Chinese medicine predates Western medicine theory by more than 2,000 years, and you say who is the branch of whom.

Traditional Chinese medicine predates Western medicine theory by more than 2,000 years...

I couldn't agree more.

There are many lost branches of traditional Chinese medicine, and since they have been lost, they naturally do not understand what their theories are. For example, the Yellow Emperor's Outer Classics, Bai's Outer Classics, and the ancient Yu Tarsus. According to legend, he was a good doctor when he was the Yellow Emperor.

Hanshu Art and Literature Chronicles: "Taishi Yellow Emperor Bian Que Yu Fang" twenty-three volumes. Yan Shigu quoted Ying Shao and said:

The Yellow Emperor is also a doctor. "Hanshu Art and Literature Chronicles": "Fang Skill, all are born tools, and one of the king's officials is also guarded."

In the ancient times, there were Qi Bo and Yu Xuan, and in the Middle Ages, there were Bian Que and Qin He, and the disease and the country were originally diagnosed. Hanxing has a canggong . Nowadays, its technology is ambiguous, so on its book, there are four kinds of preface techniques.

Historical records Bian Que said: In ancient times, the doctor had Yu Xuan, and the treatment was not sprinkled with soup, the stone bridge was introduced, the case was poisoned and ironed, and a set of responses to the disease, because of the loss of the five organs, it was to cut the skin and dissolve the muscles, the veins and tendons, the brain and the marrow were barren and the claw curtain, the intestines and stomach, the five internal organs were rinsed, and the essence was easy to form.

It has become a cure, and the ghosts and gods avoid it, saying that Yuan said: The middle ages were doctors, and Yu was called Yu, and Yu was also doctors. The marrow and brain bundle are blind, the nine orifices are burned, and the meridians are determined, and the dead are reinstated as the living, so it is called Yu, and Ban Gu said:

Fang is a trick, a tool of life, and one of the king's officials. In the ancient times, there was Qi Bo Yu Xuan, and in the Middle Ages, there was Bian Que Qin He, and Ying Shao said: Bian Que Yu Xuan, and the Yellow Emperor was also a doctor.

At that time, the infection could not be controlled, and even now, antibiotics are abused, and it may not be possible.

Traditional Chinese medicine likes to imitate antiques, and constantly uses a few words in ancient books to express that "this has long been conquered by Chinese medicine", and then produces a sense of pride that "Lao Tzu was once much wider than you". Western medicine treatment is based on materialology, chemistry to restrain human diseases, the introduction of Western thought of medicine, the specific time has not been figured out, the first method, such as the human body as a machine, the machine inside and outside the whole body has many parts, that is, all parts of the human body, internal organs, external hands, feet and minds, physiologically, Chinese medicine is based on the function of the viscera, such as the liver is on the right, the qi is on the left, the lungs are on the left, and the qi is on the right. Western medicine is based on the substantive function of the organs, such as the liver is located on the right, mainly for detoxification, do not agree with qixing, the lungs are breathing, and oxygen is taken on both sides. The method used in **....Anti-natural, anti-physiological, anti-life....Forever in self-denial:

The practice of the past is negated by the present, and the practice of the present is negated by the future....Mistakes and mistakes....Repeated mistakes....Changing and changing....There is never a right ending....Just because there is no theory....Like a wandering lonely soul...

Traditional Chinese medicine cannot be scientifically developed because it cannot abandon its own metaphysical system. Traditional Chinese medicine itself also has different schools, and there are various inconsistencies and inconsistencies between them. Like cinnabar is not poisonous, the Chinese medicine community has been arguing for at least 400 years, and now any junior high school student knows that cinnabar is mercury sulfide, and heavy metals are poisonous.

Western medicine is about theory, and Chinese medicine is about dialectic. Western medicine mainly finds bacteria, kills the virus with drugs, and then recovers. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is to enhance the body's ability to resist the virus, so that the body can not get sick.

Both Chinese and Western medicine are compatible with each other and complement each other's strengths.

The theory of Western medicine comes from the intersection of various disciplines of natural science, which is consistent with the development of modern society. It has a complete pharmacology, pathology, anatomy and other aesthetic systems, and strong support such as mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology and information science. It is the principle of human reason.

Science is not omnipotent, pseudoscience is omnipotent.

It should be Western medicine, because I can understand some of his theories, but the effect of Chinese medicine is also very good.

The theory of traditional Chinese medicine is more reliable, that is, many Western medical theories are not accepted by others now, and most people in this process also have certain doubts in this regard, so in this case, they still choose the theory of traditional Chinese medicine.

I think the theory of Chinese medicine is more reliable, because the use of Chinese medicine can regulate the body.

Traditional Chinese medicine talks about the overall concept, and it is also holographic**, and now many scientists say that holographic is very scientific.

Western medicine is based on seeing is believing, and all the best methods are based on what the eyes see, and looking at the body is not a comprehensive view. For example, a bone on the foot is protruding, and traditional Chinese medicine determines that there is a problem with the spleen by observing and checking the pulse, and the bone can obviously go down through the conditioning of the spleen meridian. But in Western medicine, a piece of bone is surgically removed.

That's the difference.

Traditional Chinese medicine naturally has its shortcomings, but this has a lot to do with the doctor's own level, if the doctor has enough cultivation, there is generally no problem.

The problem of Western medicine is also due to the fact that Chinese are not really experts in this area, it is said that the United States can now let a cancer patient live for 50 years, can China do it? So it's an individual limitation. But it is also because Western medicine always takes what is seen as the standard, and in fact there are many things that cannot be seen.

For example, a menopausal woman is uncomfortable, her problem is invisible, so Western medicine has no way, but Chinese medicine can.

That's the difference.

What is the difference between Chinese medicine and Western medicine? How do their theories differ? - Different guiding theories based on Western medicine is based on the development of modern science and technology, a continuation of ancient Roman medicine, it emphasizes evidence, reproducibility, emphasis on body anatomy, and emphasizes experimental research and clinical observation of microscopic and large samples.

Advocate disease differentiation ** without emphasizing individual differences.

Traditional Chinese medicine is based on the ancient Chinese philosophy of yin and yang and the five elements, the concept of the unity of heaven and man, and the doctrine of essence and qi. The overall concept emphasizes macroscopic and balance, does not pay attention to body anatomy, emphasizes individual differences, advocates syndrome differentiation and treatment, and treats the same disease and different diseases.

What are the disadvantages of TCM? The disadvantage is also his strength -- it's not very reproducible, because he puts a lot of emphasis on dialectical arguments. Therefore, it can't be a large sample, the individual differences are strong, the rate is small, and the rate is small.

Western medicine is based on local **, all diseases are caused by toxins in the body of bacteria and viruses, instruments, chemical preparations**, the effect is fast, and the symptoms are not cured. Traditional Chinese medicine uses the five elements to restrain each other, and the effect is slow

Traditional Chinese medicine is not only about the five elements, five luck and six qi, meridian direction, nine needles, I Ching health care, etc., and Western medicine treats your external diseases, it can not see your inner root of the disease, so it can only treat the symptoms, and he does not admit that there is a meridian This statement, but now it is much better, foreigners also like acupuncture, which is the traditional medicine of our country has been carried forward, but the disadvantage of Zhongyi is slow, but it can cure the root, although Western medicine is fast, but it can only treat the symptoms.

Western medicine materialism. ,, Chinese medicine is only phenomenal.

First of all, we should know that the controversy between Chinese medicine and Western medicine is different from the controversy in our concept, it is different from the general debate. Existing theories do not explain this controversy well. We can discuss this debate from the perspective of scope theory.

What we think of as an argument is one in which both sides of the argument eventually come to a consensus. The reason is not clear, the lights are not turned on, and the two sides reach a consensus through arguments. All admit that one conclusion is right and the other is wrong.

However, there is also a kind of controversy, and the argument between the two sides is not in the direction of unification and unity, but in the direction of differences. Disagreement from the beginning, no matter how long the argument lasts, remains disagreement. The public says that the public is reasonable, and the mother-in-law says that the mother-in-law is reasonable.

A says I'm right and B is wrong, B says I'm right and A is wrong, and both parties have sufficient evidence to prove that they're right.

The scope theory refers to the former argument as the same scope argument;The latter argument is called a two-scope controversy. The two-scope debate is also a form of debate, and it is possible that there will be two spheres of controversy in the fields of politics, economics, culture, science and philosophy. For example, the controversy over whether literature and art have a class character, the controversy over "white horses and non-horses", the controversy between the particle theory and the fluctuation theory, and so on, all belong to the two categories of controversy.

The controversy between Chinese medicine and Western medicine belongs to two areas of controversy.

So why is there a two-scope argument?

This is because of the scope of observation, and our human eyes only observe a certain range of things.

The human eye grows in front of the head, and when the body and head do not move the eyeballs, the spatial range observed by the eyes is called the eye-movement field, and the eye-movement field is the basic way for people to observe objective things. When you look at it, you can see that the scope of space is not infinite, it has a marginal boundary, and you only see things within a certain range, and you can't see things outside this range, such as left, right, and behind you.

The same is true of individual things, because everything in the world is a whole made up of two or more parts, and our human eyes can only see the parts, but not the whole. What we see is only a certain range of things, and this phenomenon is called the scope of observation.

Therefore, in the debate between Chinese medicine and Western medicine, whether it is Chinese medicine or Western medicine, they observe how to treat diseases and save people, but what they observe is a certain range of things. That is to say, Chinese medicine and Western medicine each observe different areas of things, just as one observes the heads of the same coin and the other observes the tails of the same coin,......What is observed is a different range of things. This is different from a dispute of the same range, where both sides of the same range of arguments are looking at the same range of things, just as they are looking at the same side of the same coin, such as heads or tails.

Reliable. Because Chinese medicine is broad and profound, and Chinese medicine has helped me cure stubborn diseases for many years, I think Chinese medicine is very reliable.

Traditional Chinese medicine is still very reliable, traditional Chinese medicine has been circulating in China for thousands of years, it is the crystallization of the wisdom of ancient human beings, and in the long run, it is the best solution with the least damage to the human body.

Traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine have their own advantages, the advantage of traditional Chinese medicine is mainly that the conditioning effect on the body is very strong, and the best is relatively small, although the medicinal properties of Western medicine are comparative, but the best effect of Western medicine is better, most of the drugs of Western medicine have anti-inflammatory effects, these effects are not in Chinese medicine.

Compared with traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine, just like the doctors in large hospitals compared with grassroots doctors, the society has formed an inherent concept, which is difficult to change, and people believe that traditional Chinese medicine is inferior to Western medicine, and grassroots doctors are not as good as doctors in large hospitals. Unless there are special circumstances, therefore, in order for Chinese medicine to have an advantage, grassroots doctors must be more powerful than doctors in large hospitals, so special situations must be discovered and created. Identify the shortcomings of Western medicine and the shortcomings of doctors in big hospitals, and there will definitely be a day when yin and yang will be balanced.

Looking back at hundreds of years ago and the war years, many people's diseases in modern times can be cured or cured without even looking at them, or they can be cured by just looking at traditional Chinese medicine. If it is really difficult and expensive to see a doctor, the hospital will not be bustling! We can't afford to waste medical resources and health insurance funds anymore!

The so-called excessive examination** is actually for Western medicine, I think: even if 90% of the diseases are solved by Chinese medicine, the health and longevity of Chinese will not be reduced!!

Traditional Chinese medicine is reliable, but many Chinese medicine doctors are not reliable.

Traditional Chinese medicine is indeed able to take care of most diseases, which can prove that the thinking concepts and methods of modern medicine are going in the wrong direction.

Western medicine is even more unreliable than Chinese medicine!!

Of course, it was just a fake Chinese medicine trick.

Western medicine is not controversial.

Don't follow the controversy, as long as you can cure the disease, it is right.

There are only unreliable people, and there are no unreliable medical skills.

Shen Yi theory is the same as the Book of Changes, it is a natural philosophy, not a real human medical theory, and the real practice is empirical medicine

My understanding: Western medicine is: science, Chinese medicine is liberal arts

The question asked by that brainless guy, is Chinese medicine reliable? Unreliable things can be passed down for thousands of years, and then disappear in fifty years, right?

There are also Tibetan doctors, Miao doctors, and cloth doctors.

Which Western medicine is reliable. Is it guaranteed to be cured?

Think about it with your reverse thinking! Chinese medicine and Western medicine who poison people will know soon?? The same is true