-
Anonymous users2024-02-13Books are the ladder of human progress, and books are the source of human wisdom. Yes, it's true that I don't have any objection, but the books that students have now are more and more divided into many categories, and everyone has their own ambitions, just like I don't care what kind of books you read. But what good does it do you to read those meaningless books, and what does it do you, and what does it do to read those unhealthy books, it will make your pure heart dirty, and everything I have just stated is my opinion, "Open books are not necessarily beneficial." ”
-
Anonymous users2024-02-12According to my experience, not necessarily, sometimes the answer cannot be found at all when the book is opened, it is very troublesome, and some of my classmates have failed because of the open book.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-11Not necessarily. It's not good to read some yellow books.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-10I think it's beneficial to open the book. The origin of the benefit of opening the book is that Song Taizu said:"As long as it's reading, there's always something good".Since then, it has become an idiom that the opening of the book is beneficial.
Gorky once said: "Books are the ladder of human progress." "The bookkeepers have been around since ancient times, and there is the "Mr. Wuliu" reading method of "not seeking to understand"; There are also Zhu Guangqian's advocacy of "scrutinizing the words and chewing the words" reading method; There are also Wang Guowei's so-called three reading realms ......But at the end of the day, open books are beneficial.
You may be wondering, why do you talk about this? It's simple, it's key"Total"Word. This is saying that there will always be good, not only good.
Therefore, to say that the book is beneficial, it needs to be argued that reading is beneficial rather than harmful. (Don't get caught up in the opposite side.) Otherwise, you will definitely lose.
The reason will be understood after reading the following)
As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, the power is so great that it makes people realize their mistakes, change their past mistakes, go to the bright road, and achieve success; Xiao can learn a few writing methods, a few words, and even recognize a few words. These are the benefits of reading, and there is no denying it. Therefore, a few points can be made to argue that bad books also have some benefits:
First, as long as it is called a bad book, it will certainly affect people's character and lead them to the wrong path. But think about it, if those bad books can't resonate with readers and make people go deep into them, then what will happen like this? If the structure and layout of the book, the way of expression, the idea and description, the language and the wording, etc., are mediocre, or even average"Journal"It's not as good as a similar composition, so how can it resonate with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad it is, at least some writing methods can be learned in the so-called bad books, and no matter how bad it is, you can learn a few words. Can this be said to be unhelpful?
Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book, it is judged by whether the good of the book outweighs the harm or the harm outweighs the good. In other words, bad books are also beneficial.
Third, Lao Tzu in ancient China had a point of view: everything has its own two sides, and since bad books are harmful, then they must have their benefits.
But have you ever thought that even if such a book exists, can anyone read it? Will you go to see it? Since I won't go to see it, then even"Uncoiled"With this premise gone, how to talk about whether opening the book is beneficial or harmful?
Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of depravity, madness, and breaking the law because of reading. So what does this mean? It can only show that the person who reads the book himself is not in the right state of mind.
That's a matter of mentality, and can't be blamed on books. Can someone take a knife to cut and kill someone, can they blame the knife for being bad?
Therefore, as long as you read, it will be beneficial, whether it is big or small. So it can be pushed"Uncoiling is beneficial"It must be true. Reference: Open book Is it not necessarily useful to have information?
-
Anonymous users2024-02-09Uncoiling is beneficial
kāi juàn yǒu yì】
Explanation]: Open book: open a book, refers to reading; Benefits: Benefits. There are always benefits to reading.
From]: Jin Tao Qian's "Waiting for the Son": "When you open the book, you will happily forget to eat." ”
Antonyms]: Reading is useless.
Syntax]: subject-predicate; as an object, a definite, and a clause.
The idea that an open book is good is that there is always a benefit to opening the book. It is often used to encourage people to be diligent and studious, and if they read more, they will benefit from ruining their friends. The reason is that books are the crystallization of human wisdom, books are the summary of historical experience, and books are the reflection of social life. >>>More
It is often said, "It is good to open a book, but it is good to read a book." However, on closer examination, this statement is not entirely true. If we are interested in every book, then "open books are beneficial" is not necessarily beneficial. >>>More
Reading is a blessing, when you are depressed, when you are bored, when you are lonely, a corresponding good book is a comfort. >>>More
Open book is beneficial means that there is always benefit in opening the book. It is often used to encourage people to be diligent and studious, and to read more will be beneficial. >>>More
The origin of the benefit of opening the book is that Song Taizu said:"As long as it's reading, there's always something good".Since then, it has become an idiom that the opening of the book is beneficial. >>>More