Ask for a problematic admissions ad about the university, please 3Q

Hello, see that your question is about to be squeezed out of the list of questions by new questions, and if the question is not expired, points will be deducted and bounty points will be forfeited! So I would like to give you a few suggestions: First, you can choose to ask questions in the correct category or go to the professional ** forum related to your question, so that more people will know the answer to your question, and more people will be more.

Second, you can get to know more knowledgeable netizens, keep in touch with netizens who have answered your questions often, and ask these friends directly when you have questions, and they will be more sincere and enthusiastic to find answers for you. Third, what should be done by oneself must be done by oneself, and some things must be solved by one's own ingenuity, and others cannot do it for them! Only what you do is truly your own, others can only provide you with guidance and advice, and ultimately rely on yourself.

You don't have my answer, but please be sure to suggest it!!While my answer probably won't solve your problem, it will certainly make you better at using Q&A

In today's highly competitive environment for college admissions, where the choice of students and parents is peddled by both college admissions culture, there are some unscrupulous admissions guidelines or propaganda, here are a few examples:

1.In the name of poison as a means of recruitment marketing.

In the early years, a female university used the names of drugs such as "poison lace" and "poison fentanyl" as a recruitment and marketing tool, which caused a lot of controversy. This kind of bad marketing method not only seriously violates morality, but also has the suspicion of spreading drug culture without authorization, which has caused an extremely bad impact on society and schools.

2.Exaggerate your strengths.

Some schools will exaggerate their advantages in publicity, such as "nationally renowned", "leading university rankings", etc. Some schools will also exaggerate their scientific research achievements, academic standards, etc., and the actual situation is far from the propaganda. This kind of false propaganda not only violates the basic principle of honesty and trustworthiness, but also has the risk of misleading consumers and reducing social credibility.

3.Emphasis on special enrollment policies such as "zero-score candidates".

When some schools publicize their enrollment policies, they will emphasize policies such as "zero-score candidates" and "special enrollment", exaggerating the actual impact of these policies to attract students and parents to sign up. These policies have limited practical effect and are only available to a very small number of people and are not applicable to everyone. Therefore, exaggerating the role of these special policies may give some students and parents a false impression.

4.Implement the "first choice must be recorded".

Some schools will emphasize their "first choice" policy in their publicity, which means that if a student makes the school their first choice, they can be admitted directly to the school. This kind of propaganda not only brings great confusion and misleading to students and parents, but also may lead to a large number of students pursuing to apply to these schools, thus intensifying competition.

5.Engaging, sycophant.

Some schools use a variety of sound and light effects and pop culture elements in admissions communications to make ads look more appealing. In addition, they will constantly praise themselves, such as "we are a new generation", "leading the industry", and so on. Although this kind of sycophant propaganda is favorable, it is actually difficult for students and parents to make informed choices.

In general, college admissions publicity methods should be carried out in a truthful and factual manner, focusing on the advantages and characteristics of the school, and helping students and parents understand the situation of the school, rather than using improper and misleading methods to obtain high enrollment rates. This is also an important prerequisite for a sound university admissions market.

As a student who has experienced all kinds of admissions pitches during college applications, I've seen a lot of very unscrupulous admissions guides and pitches.

Some of these propaganda may exaggerate the reputation and popularity of the school, giving the false impression that it is a very good school, when in fact it is not. These propaganda may use very fancy vocabulary and flashy **, but in reality what they promote is not what the school really is.

There are also admissions guides that may use a variety of techniques to make students feel like the school is a good fit for them. For example, they may highlight a special program or special course at one of the school's land-based sedan chairs in their admissions communications, or promote the honors and accomplishments of certain alumni, professors, or students of the school. These announcements may use very dramatic language and stories to capture the interest of potential students.

I've also seen admissions pitches that have a great sense of humor, and they may use some hilarious or mischievous language to grab the attention of potential students. This propaganda may not emphasize the academic achievements of the school, but rather the life and experience of the students at the school.

While these promotions may be a bit unorthodox, I think their purpose is to attract more potential students to the school and to provide more fun and experience during their time at the university. However, as applicants, we need to carefully analyze these promotions to understand what is really going on at the school so that we can make the best decision.

I've seen these unscrupulous admissions guide promotions:1Turn waste into treasure and play with exams :

This admissions guide breaks with traditional learning methods and claims in a humorous and exaggerated way that they can turn waste paper into treasure. They claim that with their educational methods, students can easily cope with exams and thus achieve excellent results. Although it may sound a bit outrageous, they cleverly use exaggerated rhetoric to attract attention.

2.Academy of Magic Admissions Guide: This admissions promotion is all about fantasy and magic.

They claim to be a magic academy that teaches students a variety of magical magical skills, such as transfiguration, flying, and spells. They also used ornate illustrations and cryptic text in their promotional materials to create the illusion of being in a magical world. 3.

Become a star, beat your exams: Set against the backdrop of entertainment and celebrities, this admissions guide claims that their education and training can help students not only succeed academically, but also in their acting careers. They use many celebrity cases and celebrity cases to prove their success stories, giving the illusion that they can become the next star by taking their courses.

4.Rulers of the Future World Training Program: This admissions campaign is based on science fiction and futuristic themes, declaring that they train students to become the rulers and leaders of the future world.

They are committed to teaching students leadership, technical knowledge, and strategic thinking to ensure that they can succeed in the competitive society of the future. While this propaganda may be overblown, it has sparked curiosity about what lies ahead. 5.

Superpower Bootcamp to Unleash Potential: This admissions advertisement claims that they can develop students' superpowers, such as telepathy, clairvoyance, and future prediction. They used some illustrations of illustrated stories and superpowers to get people interested in their lessons.

Although these superpowers do not exist in real life, this propaganda has sparked curiosity about the mysterious and unknown abilities of Fan Qiao. These unorthodox admissions guide propaganda attract attention in their quirky, exaggerated, and entertaining ways. Although they may be far removed from the actual education and training content, they successfully exploit emotional appeal and people's curiosity about non-traditional methods.

Not only did these campaigns create a stir in the admissions process, but they also showed the importance of creativity and humor in marketing. However, as students and parents, we still need to be rational and critical when choosing a learning institution. It is important to understand the real quality of education and training content, and not just be attracted by the publicity.

Look for accredited schools and professional bodies and share their experiences and opinions with others to make informed decisions. The purpose of admissions communication is to catch people's eyes and get them interested. But we should learn to distinguish between false propaganda and exaggerated propaganda.

Most importantly, we should focus on the practical effects of education and the quality of training to ensure that we have a truly rewarding learning experience.

I've seen a lot of unscrupulous admissions guides or promotions, and here are some of the practical examples I've cited:

1.Exaggerating the strength of the school: Some schools will exaggerate their strength, for example, claiming that they are among the top 10 universities in the country, but in fact they do not have such real power.

2.Malicious attacks on other schools: Some schools will maliciously attack other schools in their propaganda, such as claiming that the quality of teaching in other schools is not good, or that the quality of students in other schools is low, etc.

This kind of propaganda is not only unethical, but it also makes students feel disgusted with this school.

3.Exaggerate employment prospects: Some schools exaggerate their employment prospects, claiming that their graduates will easily find good jobs.

But in reality, the market is very competitive, and no school can guarantee that all graduates will find good jobs. This kind of propaganda often leads students to misunderstand the job prospects.

4.False propaganda: Some schools will exaggerate their strength in propaganda and even fabricate false data to attract students to apply for the exam. This kind of propaganda is not only unethical, but it can also create disappointment in students about this school.

Overall, misguided admissions guides or propaganda often cause misunderstanding and confusion to students, so students must carefully consider when choosing a school and not be fooled by these false propaganda.