The difference between inference and inference, the difference between inferential inference

Reasoning is a process, and inference is a result. Inferences are inferred.

What is recognized but cannot be inferred is an axiom.

A theorem is an acknowledgment of an axiom that can be obtained by inference, while inference is sometimes a special case of a theorem and is not significantly different from a theorem. For example, Banach's inverse operator theorem is a corollary of the open image principle, but it is also called a theorem in itself.

Inference is a chain of inferences that are linked together in which the conclusion of one inference acts as the premise of the next; An argument is a sequence of inferences that contains a series of inferences, and the conclusion of one inference may serve as a premise for the next. An argument can contain many inferences, and an inference can contain many inferences; Inference is in reasoning, and reasoning is in argumentation. Of course, not all reasoning exists in arguments, and reasoning is also divided into reasoning in explanation and reasoning in arguments.

Therefore, we should not confuse these three concepts when we use them. Legal argumentation is an abstract process of thinking about applying positive legal norms to concrete cases. Legal reasoning is the external manifestation of the process of legal argumentation, and is the basic framework for applying abstract legal rules (major premises) to specific cases (minor premises).

If legal interpretation only solves the problem of determining the meaning of the "major premise", legal reasoning must link the interpreted major premise with the proven minor premise in order to reach the conclusion of the case. The frequently used legal reasoning methods include deductive reasoning, non-deductive reasoning, anti-deductive reasoning, substantive reasoning, etc., and the application of each reasoning method is not only a simple inference of formal logic, but a multi-dimensional thinking process that integrates various other legal reasoning methods. Headlines Lai Yan.

Reasoning is a process, and inference is a result. Inferences are inferred. Hope.

Summary. The words speculation, inference, and inference can all refer to the process of speculation and analysis based on existing information in Chinese, but the emphasis and application scenarios between them are different. Here are the differences between these three words:

1.Speculation: Speculation is primarily based on intuition or some kind of assumption about the possibility of the future.

This is often not supported by sufficient evidence, so there may be some uncertainty. Speculation is common in everyday life, literature, and science fiction** and is used to describe people's guesses about unknown events based on their own intuition or perceptions. 2.

Inference: An inference is a conjecture based on certain evidence and theories. Inferences rely more on evidence and logical reasoning than speculation, so their conclusions are often more reliable.

In scientific research and academic discussions, inferences are often used to analyze and explain phenomena and to make inferences about possible future development trends based on existing data or theories. 3.Inference:

Inference is the analysis and inference of causal relationships between things on the basis of existing evidence. Inference usually involves the analysis of the correlations and regularities between things in order to draw more reliable conclusions. In scientific research and practical applications, inference is often used to perform statistical analysis of data to discover correlations and trends between data to support decision-making and action.

The words "speculation", "inference" and "inference" can all refer to the process of speculation and analysis based on existing information in Chinese, but the emphasis and application scenarios between them are different. Here are the differences between these three words:1

Speculation: Speculation is primarily based on intuition or some kind of assumption about the possibility of the future. This is often not supported by sufficient evidence, so there may be some uncertainty.

Speculation is common in everyday life, literature, and science fiction** and is used to describe people's guesses about unknown events based on their own intuition or perceptions. 2.Corollary:

Inferences are speculations based on certain evidence and theories. Inferences rely more on evidence and logical reasoning than speculation, so their conclusions are often more reliable. In research and academic discussions, inferences are often used to analyze and explain phenomena and make inferences about possible future development trends based on existing data or theories.

3.Inference: Inference is the analysis and inference of causal relationships between things based on existing evidence.

Inference usually involves the analysis of the correlations and regularities between things in order to draw more reliable conclusions. In scientific research and practical applications, inference is often used to statistically analyze data to identify correlations and trends between data to support decision-making and action.

Can you add, I don't quite understand it.

In conclusion, speculation focuses more on intuition and subjectivity, while inference and inference focus more on evidence and logical reasoning. In practical application, these three words can be selected and collocated according to the context and the meaning to be expressed. Hope mine can help you.

Reasoning is a method of logical analysis and inference based on known facts and experience to draw conclusions.

1. The basic concept of reasoning

As a way of thinking of human beings, reasoning is the process of extracting universal laws from specific phenomena and deriving new understandings through the use of common sense and logical associations. Reasoning is an important way of thinking and knowledge acquisition, which has a wide range of applications in logic, philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence and other fields.

2. The type of structure of reasoning

There are two types of reasoning: deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning, which are the most important ways to classify reasoning. Deductive reasoning is reasoning from the general to the individual through logical analysis, from the antecedent of the definite to the inevitable conclusion; Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, is to infer a general conclusion from a special situation, which belongs to the reasoning from the individual to the universal.

3. The scope of application of reasoning

As a basic way of thinking, reasoning is not only applicable to cognitive and judgment problems in daily life, but also widely used in academic research, engineering technology, business decision-making, policy making, and artificial intelligence. In these areas, reasoning can help people discover inner patterns and connections, come up with solutions to problems, etc.

4. The implementation of reasoning

There are many ways to realize reasoning, including human thinking reasoning and logical reasoning of computer programs. In terms of human intelligence, reasoning is the result of the human brain's combination of logical knowledge and experience, and in some cases can be more in-depth and accurate than mere mathematical calculations. In terms of computer artificial intelligence, the process of reasoning is based on the logical knowledge and rule base involved in the field of artificial intelligence.

5. Application fields of reasoning

As a universal way of thinking, reasoning has a wide range of applications in many fields, such as language processing, search engine optimization, bioinformatics, data mining and machine learning, computer-aided teaching, intelligent games, etc. Among them, the field of artificial intelligence is the most prominent, because inference models and algorithms are the core of artificial intelligence implementation, and in technical applications such as "intelligent search and recommendation", excellent inference capabilities can greatly improve the performance and application experience of computer systems.

Explanation of reasoning.

1) [examine and put in order] The rhetoric is too funny, the meaning is broad, the reasoning is old, and the hatred is redundant. ——Southern Dynasty Liang Xiao Qi "Collected Memories" (2) [speculate] Through repeated examination of a subject or material, and often without experimental proof or the introduction of new information, a concept or theory is derived (3) [inference; reasoning] logical noun . The action of reaching another truth through one or several statements or judgments that are believed to be true is a direct reasoning derived from the previous statement, statement, or judgment that is explained in detail (1).

Respect for reason. Han Liu Xiang "The Biography of the Daughters of the Lie: Aunt Lu Yi": Qi Jun attacked Lu, the righteous aunt was modest, saw the army and walked the mountains, abandoned her son and hugged her nephew.

Qi will ask and reason wisely. The woman is righteous, and the soldiers are stopped. Tang Cui Xiang "Xiangyang Early Autumn Sending Cen Shilang" poem:

The body is reasoning, and the self-defense is ultimately ambiguous. Song Zhouxuan, "Qingbo Magazine", Volume 3: "Lotte is not worried, and he knows his fate; Reasoning is peaceful, and it is also dedicated.

The rhetoric is too funny, the meaning is broad, the reasoning is old, and the hatred is redundant. ” 3).Logical nouns.

Draw new conclusions from known premises. Liang Qichao, "The General Trend of Changes in China's Academic Thought", Chapter 3, Section 2: "Famous speakers are as heavy and complex as northern studies, and their reasoning is as treacherous as southern studies.

Wang Xiyan, "The Patient": Abstract thinking and reasoning out of thin air can only be shown to be empty and useless when they are compared with real life. ”

Word decomposition Explanation of push push ī hand against an object outward or forward force to move the object: cart. Hustling.

Massage. Push over. Deliberate.

Yielded. Work with a tool that moves forward: push the head.

Dozer. Making things work: promote.

Promote (妌). Nudge. Salesmanship.

Thinking further, from the point of the known, to the other: the explanatory theory of inference, the pattern and level of matter itself, the order of objective things themselves: the mind.

Skin texture. Structured. Reason.

The law of things, the criterion of right and wrong, according to: reason. Reason.

Reason. Theory. Rationale.

Understand. Ideal. Reason.

Confidently. Natural sciences, sometimes referred specifically to "physics":

1. Referring to different 1. Reasoning: A form of thinking that derives a new judgment from one or several existing judgments.

The judgment on which the reasoning is based is called the premise, and the judgment on which the judgment is obtained on the basis of the premise is called the conclusion. 2. Analyze the socks: divide an old thing, a phenomenon, and a concept into simple groups, and find out the essential properties of these parts and the relationship between them (as opposed to "synthesis").

2. Analysis: "Ancient and Modern ** Shen Xiaoxia Meeting Teacher Table": "Zhang Qian and Li Wan were cried and complained by this woman, so they had to analyze a few words, and there was nowhere to interject.

3. Different grammar 1. Reasoning: joint; as a predicate, a definite 2, analysis: joint; Make a definite statement.

Reasoning, logic refers to one of the basic forms of thinking, the process of deriving new judgments (conclusions) from one or several known judgments (premises). (Modern Chinese Dictionary (6th Edition), p. 1323) Reasoning is divided into inductive reasoning, deductive reasoning and analogical reasoning according to the thinking direction of the reasoning process.

Inductive reasoning is the analysis and study of many individual things to draw a common general conclusion. It is characterized by moving from concrete to abstract, from individual to general, and conforms to the laws of people's understanding. Deductive reasoning is the conclusion of an individual thing from a known general truth.

It is characterized by moving from the general to the individual, from the abstract to the concrete. Inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning are the most basic forms of reasoning when writing arguments, and they are extremely common. Analogical reasoning is the method of deducing from a certain property of a known thing that is similar to another thing that also has the same property.

It is characterized by being from individual to individual.

Reasoning, which can be interpreted as deducing theories.

Inference, which can be interpreted as a deduced conclusion.

The term for reasoning is called logical reasoning, and the term for inference is called pragmatic reasoning.

1. Logical reasoning is mainly used to analyze things to infer cause and effect, and the content of reasoning must include four elements:

1. Major premise, 2. Minor premise, 3. Conclusion, 4. Form of reasoning.

The form of reasoning is different from the other three elements, which can only be seen through analysis.

Thoughts and feelings, sometimes there are reasoning elements in them, but they are not as simple as logical reasoning, and it will be a bit messy.

Reasoning is the process of inference, and inference is the conclusion of reasoning.