The Lord of the Rings has won multiple Oscars, why is The Lord of the Rings so classic?

The classic of "The Lord of the Rings" is that the script and film and television are both flowering, you can take a look at his original work, which is a world-renowned literary masterpiece, although it is also written in an alternate world like Chinese Internet literature, but seriously, it is much stronger than Chinese Internet literature, and my other idea came out again, that is, China's Internet **, it is not literature at all, it is simply a child's play.

It's just a pile of words. <>

Everyone should know Game of Thrones

Bar, this drama is based on "A Song of Ice and Fire".

Adapted, why mention it, because the author of "A Song of Ice and Fire" was inspired by "The Lord of the Rings" to create this world-renowned literary masterpiece.

First, film and television adaptation.

Western literary adaptations of film and television never seem to be speculative but cater to the audience, they only welcome collaborators alone, often not because of business at first, but a director particularly likes the story, and then begins to spend energy and time to adapt it into film and television, yes, if it is not for money, it is like and hobby, and you must be able to do better in the face of what you like, and every frame is a super sense of picture. <>

Film and television adaptations have also inherited the writing techniques in literature.

That's God's perspective.

It is not a certain character as the protagonist, but every character who appears in the story is the protagonist, and then it is delicately carved, and in Chinese literature, it can be compared with "Dream of Red Mansions".

Personally, I don't think there's anything else.

Second, the literature of careful wording. <>

Yes, you can take a look at the character lines in it, every sentence is just right, which is very rare, maybe you think the special effects in it are difficult, but this is not one of the most difficult, and the arrangement of the script and story line is also very difficult, it is not that you can bring an overhead world into reality on a whim at home behind closed doors, which requires the author's literary skills, and the original work can be called a master, film and television can be called epic, in my opinion, the two become classics after they are added.

This film has a high-production team, a fascinating plot, and the characters portrayed by the actors are distinctive, making it a fine work.

It's classic because the Lord of the Rings stunts at that time were very high-level, and the film was very long, and the plot was very good.

First of all, the Lord of the Rings narrative is grand, involving many countries, with different races and locations, in which the mental changes and personalities of each character go with the flow, and there is no abruptness, and secondly, there are **aspects, many of which are popular ** for major occasions.

Because his plot is very novel, and the whole is interlocking, making it impossible to play, and the acting skills of all the leading actors are very good.

The Lord of the Rings 3: The Return of the King won a big win at the 76th Academy Film Festival, and the 74th Academy Award for "The Lord of the Rings 1: The Fellowship of the Ring"; The Lord of the Rings 1:

The 74th Olympiad Ska Technical Awards, 4 technical awards: Best Cinematography, Best Visual Effects, Best Makeup, Best Film Score; The 75th Academy Awards of "The Lord of the Rings 2: The Two Towers" 2 technical awards:

Best High Cover Sound Editing, Best Visual Effects; The 76th Academy Awards for "The Lord of the Rings 3: The Return of the King", 11 awards: Best Picture, Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Song by Ho Fu, Best Editing, Best Soundtrack, Best Sound Effects, Best Makeup, Best Visual Effects, Best Art Direction, Best Costume Design.

The Lord of the Rings 3: The Return of the King won a big win at the 76th Academy Film Festival, and the 74th Academy Award for "The Lord of the Rings 1: The Fellowship of the Ring"; The Lord of the Rings 1:

The 74th Academy Awards for The Fellowship of the Ring, 4 technical awards: Best Cinematography, Best Visual Effects, Best Makeup, Best Film Score; The 75th Academy Awards of "The Lord of the Rings 2: The Two Towers" 2 technical awards:

Best Sound Editing, Best Visual Effects; The 76th Academy Awards of "The Lord of the Rings 3: The Return of the King", 11 awards: Best Picture, Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Song, Best Editing, Best Soundtrack, Best Sound Effects, Best Makeup, Best Visual Effects, Best Art Direction, Best Costume Design. Seek adoption.

Because there were no competitive films in the same year.

<> one, a lot of these answers are very out, you don't like that you don't know you can't see it, but is it related to the work? You wake up first to see the reasonableness of the attitude, you question your classics, isn't it because you don't like it? Why don't you like this work?

Are you a difficult big name? There are people who mention Harry Potter ice and Warcraft, various pull steps, I don't know that these works have drawn magic rings, there are many of their authors, from the book to the movie that year. Multiple awards, so many people embarrassingly fall into an epic saga, is there so many?

Is this a robot?

Thousands of people have been your opinion for decades. I don't like to see the dream of a red man. I'm leaving.

I have yet to see a single person who is affected by the historical status and typology of red architecture every day. The kind of person who specializes in posts "Redman Dream is one of the four famous people". It is looking for a pathological sensation.

The final analysis is because you don't like it, you don't like to explain that you are not fit to read the book, it does not mean that this kind of book is very bad, there is such a job to find your favorite job. When I say it, you really feel like the magic army doesn't match, or is too self-centered and has an unbalanced mentality.

2. Books and movies make people feel different from the powerful point. The film is more commercial, as well as the stroke of war, the ink gives less than 4 frodo lines, and the overall atmosphere is not too dark. But this book can feel that Frodo is the absolute protagonist.

In the end, if it weren't for the frodo success, the efforts of others would have been fur and rain. The overall atmosphere is very frustrating, the reading process is like being frodo, suffering difficulties, then I will hear a little good news from others, but I don't see hope, I can only hold on one step, I don't know how to end.

Combined with the author's anti-war theme, it can be understood as a soldier in a cloak, but does not want to give up, only a little hard work. After reading the book, I finally went out, but I didn't have this feeling, in a word, reading a book, like Frodo, watching a movie, watching a documentary in the middle and on the soil.

Third, the opening of the middle and soil series is actually a fairy tale written from torkin, and finally written into an epic, inventing a set of languages for **, which is really a very good one. But there is a saying that it does not require any particularly high level of appreciation, at least a famous masterpiece, ** does not need to be explained.

Because the special effects of this movie are very good-looking, and the actors' acting skills are very exquisite, it has received a lot of praise from fans, and the Douban score is very high, so it is a classic.

Because the shooting at that time was all taken from real scenes, and no special effects were used. The actors in it are all very dedicated, but now there are no artists who are willing to make such a big sacrifice for the sake of acting, so it is difficult to surpass.

Because "The Lord of the Rings" is grand and beautifully made, no film has been able to surpass it so far, so it is a classic.

Because its plot and special effects are very good, the choice of actors is also very close to the characters.