What do you think about the ranking of seats by grades when you were a student?

Reasonable, the last year, the teacher has no time to pull the students behind to go, so it's unfair to the students who study hard, you can only let the good students listen to the lecture in front, as for those who don't like to learn, it depends on the consciousness, if you have ambition, you will study hard, and the good grades will naturally go to the front, if you break the jar and fall, no one can take you.

If the seats are arranged according to their academic performance, it may also lead to the formation of two opposing groups in the class, and there may be a phenomenon of students who are not good at math in the class bullying students who are good at studying.

It's unreasonable, the teacher's mentality is not good, you put the student behind the students with poor grades, isn't this a free-range, isn't the teacher giving up on them clearly, the more this is the case, the more the students hate learning, thinking that the teacher has discriminated against us, and what is the strength of learning. It would be much better if the teacher wanted to put them in front, but because of the majesty of the teacher, I had to listen carefully. Besides, I'm embarrassed to disturb others and force myself to be serious.

In that case, I think the results will be much better.

Now it's basically like this, whether it's high school or junior high school, it's normal to divide classes according to grades, my daughter was in junior high school when she was in a row of seats, but there are a lot of children who don't want to learn in class chatting at the bottom, resulting in you want to listen to the class can't hear clearly, so, good students have been catching up, even if you want to catch up, it's very difficult, the starting point of the teacher is for the sake of those children who learn well, three years is really hard, the last year is the first step to determine the fate of life, Teachers don't want their children's hard work to go to waste, and I'm in favor of that.

Sit separately from those who study better and those who are worse, so that they have less influence on each other. I remember that when we were in the third year of junior high school, the head teacher let the students who were good at school choose the position at will, and I chose to sit in the second row of the class because of my good grades, so I was a very tall person standing in front of the class, and to be honest, I could really listen to the class very carefully if I sat in front of the class, after all, the podium may be in front of me, and I can't doze off or make small movements or anything.

I don't think this is very reasonable, if the taller students sit in the front, it will affect the sight of the other students in the class, and the students who study better may not sit straight in order not to cover the students in the back, which will affect the spine.

I think it is more reasonable, so that the students who study better can sit in a better position in the class, so that the students who learn well can get more attention from the teachers, study more seriously, and help the improvement of the academic performance of this group of students.

If you are seating according to your grades, you may be overlooked by the teacher who is in the back row and will hurt their self-esteem and cause them to give up their studies altogether.

Our teachers let the top ones choose their seats first, and then the top students generally sit together. I think that's good, just like the Matthew effect, the stronger are stronger.

I choose seats according to the grades, I personally feel that this is an incentive mechanism, pay will be rewarded, those who feel unreasonable are most likely parents whose children's grades are poor, I also take care of the last five children from time to time, let them choose the seat first! Nothing is unfair, nothing is unreasonable.

I don't know about others but I really hate the first position under the podium, the teacher is staring at you all the time, small movements, all in a daze, very annoying.

I don't think it's very reasonable, and it doesn't take into account the feelings of the students, especially the feeling of poor learning, which is particularly unfair.

I think that in this case, the polarization will become more and more serious.

Introduction: Primary school students are relatively less stressful to study, so they should be more relaxed. However, some people have found that in some schools, there is a phenomenon of elementary school students being ranked according to their grades, so is this phenomenon reasonable?

For primary school students, they should not pay so much attention to grades, and if they pay too much attention to learning, it will make students study too stressful. However, if the school does not treat it well in this process, if the seats are arranged according to the grades, it is easy for children to have all kinds of psychological problems.

First of all, children attach great importance to their own performance, and if the teacher directly ranks according to the grades, the child is subconscious.

Inside, you will feel that you are a child with poor academic performance. In such a situation, because the child is not able to adjust psychologically in time, it is easy to feel that he is very bad, which will affect the child's future development, which is a long-term and far-reaching impact on the child. In addition, no matter what age group you are, you should not be ranked according to your grades.

If the school or teacher chooses to educate children in this way, it is not in line with the laws of education, and there is no professional quality. Therefore, it is very unreasonable and undesirable for primary school students to arrange seats according to their grades, and it should be stopped in time.

In fact, the growth of primary school students should not have too much academic pressure, and more importantly, comprehensive growth. Whether it's physical fitness.

It's still a personal interest, or the ability to learn.

Only comprehensive development in each aspect can give children a better future. Moreover, there is no pressure for children to go to school, so parents who are sure to be able to go to middle school do not have to worry too much. At this time, it is more important for children to be able to take over the school life, understand the society, recognize the society, and be able to have a good collective life.

Under this circumstance, it is a good school education, so the school must not deviate in the process of educating children, and must improve the overall quality of primary school students.

Irrationality. I don't think it's reasonable because seating according to grades for elementary school students has a lot of negative effects on elementary school students.

I think this is very unreasonable, because it will make students with bad grades feel very low and feel very unfair.

I think it's unreasonable, teachers should treat every student fairly, not exclude any student, and not score good or bad according to grades.

I don't think it's reasonable because it's not good for your child's physical and mental health at all, and it's not good for your child's academic performance at all.

Seating at school has always been a hot topic of discussion. Parents and students want to sit in the third row of the class, sitting in the first row feels too close to the blackboard, which is not good for eyesight, and sitting in the back row feels too far away from the teacher, and the effect of listening to the class is not ideal. But there is always a first row and a last row in the class, and it is impossible for everyone to be crowded in the middle.

Therefore, for the sake of fairness, some homeroom teachers choose to arrange seats according to grades.

Is it reasonable to have a seating arrangement by grade? The philosopher Hegel said, "To be is to be reasonable." In fact, this is also a relatively fair approach. There is no absolute fairness in anything, as long as it is implemented according to uniform standards, it is relatively fair.

In fact, we hold the same view in society. A student, especially a primary and secondary school student, is mostly evaluated by everyone as good or bad as his grades. The evaluation of teachers by all walks of life is almost based on the performance of the students taught by the teacher, and the quality of the teacher's teaching is evaluated.

We can't expect teachers to meet all the students' requirements when they are in a row of seats, because that's not possible.

Arranging seats according to grades can basically ensure that students who study hard have a relatively good learning environment, and can also stimulate students' fighting spirit and form a good learning atmosphere. This arrangement of seating is also generally convincing to students.

There is also a way to arrange seats by height. This sounds fair, but if some students are not tall but do not study, sitting in the front row will affect both the teacher's lecture and the other students' listening.

Of course, according to the principle of "student-oriented", teachers should take care of some students who do have special circumstances. However, when taking care of these students, it is necessary to have an open discussion among the students and obtain the approval of most of the other students in order to take care of certain special students. Because once the rules are in place, people will be very sensitive to special circumstances.

In fact, no matter which way the seats are arranged, there are people who are not satisfied. Weighing the pros and cons, perhaps ranking seats by grade is more convincing.

Unreasonable, which will seriously discourage children's usual enthusiasm for learning. If this happens, the teacher's ability to supervise the poor students is insufficient, and the children will involuntarily wander when learning.

This method is not reasonable, because there are some children who do not do well in school, but they are relatively tall, and if they sit in the back at this time, they will not be able to see the teacher lecture, which will make their grades even worse.

I don't think this is reasonable, because it will put a lot of psychological pressure on many children, and at the same time, it will make them feel very embarrassed and embarrassed.

It is very unreasonable, because this method is unfair to many students, and it will also hit students' self-esteem, and may even make students tired of learning.

I don't think it's feasible, it's unfair, and it's easy for students with poor grades to feel humiliated and even less interested in learning.

It's not right for that, because it's very unfair to some students.

Realistically, this approach is okay, but it will be counterproductive, on the one hand, it can stimulate students' enthusiasm, and on the other hand, it is likely to make students disgusted.

I don't think it's feasible, grades are not a measure of how good or bad a student is.

This is so unfeasible that it is completely discriminatory.

This practice is not good, and some poor students are more competitive than eugenics in the future.

I don't think it's preferable, it's a bit unfair.

No, if you don't study well, you will keep doing it later? So what else is there to learn.